LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Schramm, Pierre
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: LB
This work consists in a theoretical overview of positioning theory, the construction of a methodology for interaction analysis, and its application to classroom interaction.\ud \ud The latter part is based on transcripts from audio-video recordings of 15 hours of lessons in mathematics and physics or science in England and in France, with children aged between 11 and 12. These transcripts were divided up into episodes, units displaying coherence in theme and purpose; and each episode was coded according to the types of behaviour the teacher displayed in them. The same types of behaviour were found in plenary interaction as those found by previous research into group work. Analysis carried out to highlight co-occurring types of behaviour (seen as rights and duties) only yielded two co-occurring rights – asking a scientific question and validating a statement, consistently with the previously noted prevalence of IRE/IRF sequences.\ud \ud A frequency analysis of the levels of occurrence of individual types of behaviour highlighted the scarcity of unsupported teacher statements. Further analysis of the episodes featuring teacher statements showed that the teacher may only introduce new elements on the basis of their own authority in highly specific circumstances: (a) after a student’s mistake, in which case the teacher’s statement is limited to explaining why the aforementioned mistake is one; (b) after a student’s question or (c) after a student’s unsolicited statement. In the last two cases, the teacher’s statement may go beyond the remit of the question or statement. Content introduced in such a way appears to have a longer-lasting legitimacy than that introduced with the help of official content.\ud \ud Some implications of these results are discussed: the need to take into account student agency in further research; and it is suggested that a lecturing style of teaching might be beneficial for learning.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • FARRINGTON, I. (1991) 'Student-Centred Learning: Rhetoric and Reality?', Journal of Further and Higher Education, Vol. 15, No. 3. pp. 16-21
    • FLYVBJERG, B. (2006) 'Five misunderstandings about case-study research', Qualitative Inquiry, Vol. 12, No. 2. pp. 219-245
    • FOUCAULT, M. (1971) L'ordre du discours : leçon inaugurale au Collège de France prononcée le 2. décembre, 1970, Paris: Gallimard
    • GROSSEN, M. (2001). La notion de contexte : quelle définition pour quelle psychologie ? Un essai de mise au point. in BERNIÉ, J.-P. (ed.) Apprentissage, développement et significations. Bordeaux: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux. pp. 59-76
    • HALL, J.K. & WALSH, M. (2002) 'Teacher-Student interaction and language learning', Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 22. pp. 186-203
    • HALLIDAY, M. (1985) 'Context of situation' in HALLIDAY, M. & HASAN, R. (eds.) Language, context, and text: aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 3-14
    • HARRÉ, R., MOGHADDAM, F.M., PILKERTON CAIRNIE, T., ROTHBART, D., SABAT, S.R. (2009) 'Recent Advances in Positioning Theory', Theory & Psychology, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 5-31
    • HARRÉ, R. & VAN LANGENHOVE, L. (1991) 'Varieties of Positioning', Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 393-407
    • WAGNER, D. & HERBEL-EISENMANN, B. (2009) 'Re-mythologizing mathematics through attention to classroom positioning', Educational Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 72 No. 1. pp. 1-15
    • WEST, R. & PEARSON, J.C. (1994) 'Antecedent and consequent conditions of student questioning: An analysis of classroom discourse across the university', Communication Education, Vol. 43 Issue 4. pp. 299-311
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article