Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Beattie, V.; Jones, M.J. (1997)
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: HF5601
The use of graphs to disclose information in corporate annual reports represents a significant dimension in financial disclosure management. Surprisingly, no inter-country comparative analysis of this area of voluntary disclosure has been conducted. This study compares the graphical reporting practices in the 1990 annual reports of 176 leading U.S. and U.K. industrial companies. Ninety-two per cent of U.S. companies use graphs compared with 80% of U.K. companies; the mean number of graphs per company being 13.0 and 7.7, respectively. Sales, an earnings measure, earnings per share and dividends per share are the four most frequently graphed aggregate financial performance variables in both countries. Significant differences in several of the variables graphed are found and explained in terms of environmental factors. In both countries, evidence of graphical information manipulation exists in the form of selectivity, measurement distortion, and presentational enhancement. Moderate evidence supports the hypothesis that U.K. companies are more likely than U.S. companies to adopt interpretative shading. Regulators need to clarify the responsibilities of directors and auditors by setting graphical guidelines.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Aerts, W., “On the Use of Accounting Logic as an Explanatory Category in Narrative Accounting Disclosures,” Accounting, Organizations and Society (1994) 19(4/5), pp. 337-353.
    • AICPA, “Other Information in Documents Containing Audited Financial Statements,” AICPA Professional Standards, Vol. 1, U.S. Auditing Standards, Section 550 (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, 1975).
    • APB, “Other Information In Documents Containing Audited Financial Statements,” Statement of Auditing Standard 160 (Auditing Practices Board, 1995).
    • APC, “Financial Information Issued With Audited Financial Statements,” Auditing Guideline (Auditing Practices Committee, 1985).
    • Arnold, J., P. Moizer and E. Noreen, “Investment Appraisal Methods of Financial Analysts: A Comparative Study of U.S. and U.K. Practices,” International Journal of Accounting (Spring 1984), pp. 1-18.
    • Ball, R. and G. Foster, “Corporate Financial Reporting: A Methodological Review of Empirical Research,” Journal of Accounting Research, Supplement (1982) 20, pp. 161-234.
    • Barrett, M. E., “Financial Reporting Practices: Disclosure and Comprehensiveness in an International Setting,” Journal of Accounting Research (Spring 1976), pp. 10-26.
    • Bazerman, M. H., Judgment in Managerial Decision Making (New York: Wiley, 1990).
    • Beattie, V. A. and M. J. Jones, The Communication of Information Using Graphs in Corporate Annual Reports, Certified Research Report 31, Chartered Association of Certified Accountants (London: Certified Accountants Educational Trust, 1992a).
    • Beattie, V. A. and M. J. Jones, “The Use and Abuse of Graphs in Annual Reports: A Theoretical Framework and Empirical Study,” Accounting and Business Research (Autumn 1992b), pp. 291-303.
    • Beattie, V. A. and M. J. Jones, “Visual Perception of Financial Information in Corporate Reports: The Role of Graphs,” Discussion Paper No. 97/01, University of Stirling, 1997.
    • Birnberg, J. G., L. Turopolec and S. M. Young, “The Organizational Context of Accounting,” Accounting, Organizations and Society (1983) 8(2/3), pp. 111-129.
    • Blocher, E., R. P. Moffie and R. W. Zmud, “Report Format and Task Complexity: Interactions in Risk Judgements,” Accounting, Organizations and Society (1986) 11(6), pp. 457-470.
    • Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants, Using Ratios and Graphics in Financial Reporting (Toronto: CICA, 1993).
    • Charity Commission (U.K.), Accounting by Charities, Statement of Recommended Practice No. 2, Exposure Draft (March 1993).
    • Cleveland, W. S., Visualizing Data (Summit, NJ: Hobart Press, 1993).
    • Cleveland, W. S., The Elements of Graphing Data, revised edition (Murray Hill, NJ: A T & T Laboratories, 1994).
    • Cleveland, W. S. and R. McGill, “Graphical Perception: The Visual Decoding of Quantitative Information on Graphical Displays of Data,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A (1987) 150(3), pp. 192-229.
    • Cleveland, W. S., M. E. McGill and R. McGill, “The Shape Parameter of a Two-Variable Graph,” Journal of the American Statistical Association (1988) 83, pp. 289-300.
    • Davis, L. R., “Report Format and the Decision-Maker's Task: An Experimental Investigation,” Accounting, Organizations and Society (1989) 14(5/6), pp. 495-508.
    • Demirag, I., “Assessing Short-term Perceptions of Group Finance Directors of UK Companies,” British Accounting Review (1995) 27, pp. 247-281.
    • DeSanctis, G. and S. L. Jarvenpaa, “Graphical Investigation of Accounting Data for Financial Forecasting: An Experimental Investigation,” Accounting, Organizations and Society (1989) 14(5/6), pp. 509-525.
    • Edwards, P. and R. A. Smith, “Competitive Disadvantage and Voluntary Disclosures,” British Accounting Review (1996) 28, pp. 155-172.
    • Emmanuel, C., D. Otley and K. Merchant, Accounting for Management Control (London: Chapman Hall, 1991).
    • Ernst and Young, US/UK GAAP Comparison (1992).
    • Frost, C. A. and G. Pownall, “Accounting Disclosure Practices in the United States and the United Kingdom,” Journal of Accounting Research (Spring 1994), pp. 75-102.
    • Gernon, H. and R. S. O. Wallace, “International Accounting Research: A Review of its Ecology, Contending Theories and Methodologies,” Journal of Accounting Literature (1995) 14, pp. 54-106.
    • Gibbins, M., A. Richardson and J. Waterhouse, “The Management of Corporate Financial Disclosure: Opportunism, Ritualism, Policies and Processes,” Journal of Accounting Research (Spring 1990) 28, pp. 121-143.
    • Gibbins, M., A. Richardson and J. Waterhouse, The Management of Financial Disclosure: Theory and Perspectives, Research Monograph Number 20 (Vancouver: The Canadian Certified General Accountant's Research Foundation, 1992).
    • Gray, R. H., R. Kouhy and S. Lavers, “Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting: A Review of the Literature and a Longitudinal Study of UK Disclosure,” Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal (1995) 8(2), pp. 47-77.
    • Gray, S. J. and L. H. Radebaugh, “International Segment Disclosures by U.S. and U.K. Multinational Enterprises: A Descriptive Study,” Journal of Accounting Research (Spring 1984), pp. 351-360.
    • Gray, S. J., L. G. Campbell and J. C. Shaw, International Financial Reporting-A Comparative International Survey of Accounting Requirements and Practices in 30 Countries (London: Macmillan, 1984).
    • Gray, S. J., L. H. Radebaugh and C. B. Roberts, “International Perceptions of Cost Constraints on Voluntary Information Disclosures: A Comparative Study of U.K. and U.S. Multinationals,” Journal of International Business Studies (Fourth Quarter 1990), pp. 597-622.
    • Guthrie, J. and L. D. Parker, “Corporate Disclosure Practices: A Comparative International Analysis,” Advances in Public Interest Accounting (1990) 3, pp. 343-352.
    • Hanson, J. D., “Developments in Financial Reporting Over the Last 20 Years,” in Financial Reporting 1988-89: A Survey of U.K. Published Accounts, L. C. L. Skerratt and D. J. Tonkin, eds. (London: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, 1989), pp. 3-13.
    • Hofstede, G. H., Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1980).
    • Hofstedt, T. R., “The Behavioral Parameters of Financial Analysis,” The Accounting Review (October 1972), pp. 679-692.
    • Hollands, J. G. and I. Spence, “Judgments of Change and Proportion in Graphical Perception,” Human Factors (1992) 34(3), pp. 313-334.
    • Hopwood, A. G., Editorial, Accounting, Organizations and Society (1996) 21(1), pp. 55-56.
    • Jarvenpaa, S. L., “The Effect of Task Demands and Graphical Format on Information Processing Strategies,” Management Science (March 1989) 35(3), pp. 285-303.
    • Johnson, J. R., R. R. Rice and R. A. Roemmick, “Pictures That Lie: The Abuse of Graphs in Annual Reports,” Management Accounting (October 1980), pp. 50-56.
    • Kaplan, S. E., “An Examination of the Effect of Presentation Format on Auditors' Expected Value Judgments,” Accounting Horizons (September 1988), pp. 90-95.
    • Korol, J. K., “Graphical Perception and the Representation of Financial Information,” Georgia Journal of Accounting (Spring 1986), pp. 147-157.
    • Kosslyn, S. M., “Understanding Charts and Graphs,” Applied Cognitive Psychology (1989) 3, pp. 185-226.
    • Kosslyn, S. M., Elements of Graph Design (New York: W. H. Freeman,1994).
    • Lee, T. A., “The Changing Form of the Corporate Annual Report,” Accounting Historians Journal (June 1994), pp. 215-232.
    • Leivian, G. M., “How to Communicate Financial Data More Effectively,” Management Accounting (USA) (July 1980), pp. 31-34.
    • Mason, A. K., The Development of International Financial Reporting Standards, ICRA Paper No. 17 (Lancaster: ICRA, 1978).
    • McKinstry, S., “Designing the Annual Reports of Burton plc from 1930 to 1994,” Accounting, Organizations and Society (1996) 21(1), pp. 89-111.
    • Meek, G. K., C. B. Roberts and S. J. Gray, “Factors Influencing Voluntary Annual Report Disclosures by U.S., U.K. and Continental European Multinational Corporations,” Journal of International Business Studies (Third Quarter 1995), pp. 555-572.
    • Nobes, C. W., “Financial Reporting in North America,” in Comparative International Accounting, 4th ed., C. W. Nobes and R. Parker (Cambridge: Prentice Hall, 1995).
    • Nobes, C. W. and R. H. Parker, Comparative International Accounting, 4th ed. (Cambridge: Prentice Hall, 1995).
    • Pany, K. and S. Wheeler, “Materiality: An Inter-Industry Comparison of the Magnitude and Stabilities of Various Quantitative Measures,” Accounting Horizons (December 1989), pp. 71-78.
    • Porter, M., The Competitive Advantage of Nations (Macmillan, 1990).
    • Preston, A. M., C. Wright and J. J. Young, “Imag[in]ing Annual Reports,” Accounting, Organizations and Society (1996) 21(1), pp. 113-137.
    • Revsine, L., “The Selective Financial Misrepresentation Hypothesis,” Accounting Horizons (December 1991), pp. 16-27.
    • Roberts, C. B., International Trends in Social and Employee Reporting, Occasional Research Paper No. 6, Chartered Association of Certified Accountants (London: Certified Accountants Educational Trust, 1990).
    • Schmid, C. F. and S. E. Schmid, Handbook of Graphic Presentation, 2nd ed. (Ronald Press, 1979).
    • Schmid, C. F., Statistical Graphics: Design Principles and Practices (New York: John Wiley/Interscience, 1983).
    • Simcox, W. A., “A Method for Pragmatic Communication in Graphic Displays,” Human Factors (August 1984) 26, pp. 483-487.
    • Squiers, C., “The Corporate Year in Pictures,” in Contest of Meaning, Bolton, R. ed. (Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1989), pp. 207-218.
    • Steinbart, P. J., “The Auditor's Responsibility for the Accuracy of Graphs in Annual Reports: Some Evidence of the Need for Additional Guidance,” Accounting Horizons (September 1989), pp. 60-70.
    • Sugden, A., “Public Relations: The Conflict with 'True and Fair',” Accountancy (September 1989), pp. 100-102.
    • Sullivan, J. J., “Financial Presentation Format and Managerial Decision Making: Tables Versus Graphs,” Management Communication Quarterly (1988) 2(2), pp. 194-216.
    • The Accountants' Magazine, “Annual Reports 'Not True and Fair', Say Shareholders,” (September 1992).
    • Thomas, A. P., “Towards a Contingency Theory of Corporate Financial Reporting Systems,” Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal (1991) 4(4), pp. 40-57.
    • Times Books, The Times 1000 1990/91: Leading Companies in Britain and Overseas (London: Times Books, 1990).
    • Tufte, E. R., The Visual Display of Quantitative Information (Cheshire, CT: Graphic Press, 1983).
    • Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman, “The Framing of Decisions and the Rationality of Choice,” Science (1981) 211, pp. 453-458.
    • Tweedie, D. and G. Whittington, “Financial Reporting: Current Problems and Their Implications for Systematic Reform,” Accounting and Business Research (Winter 1990), pp. 87-102.
    • Watts, R. and J. L. Zimmerman, Positive Accounting Theory (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986).
    • Weetman, P. and S. J. Gray, “International Financial Analysis and Comparative Performance: The Impact of UK Versus US Accounting Principles on Earnings,” Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting (1990) 2(3), pp. 111-130.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article