Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Mitchell, V-W.; Bakewell, C.; Jackson, P. R.; Heslin, C. (2015)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: HD
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between consumer risk perceptions and behaviour when information about food risks is framed in a positive or negative way.\ud \ud Design/methodology/approach - Using food consumption scenarios in an on-line experiment consumers perceived risk and risk tolerance is examined when messages are framed in three different news-type stories.\ud \ud Findings - As anticipated, message framing emerged as a significant predictor of perceived risk and the higher an individual’s self-reported tolerance of risk, the more risk they were willing to accept.\ud \ud Research limitations/implications - The use of hypothetical scenarios and relatively small convenience sample size could be improved by further research.\ud \ud Practical implications - Through simple adjustments to wording, food crises of confidence may be reduced and the implications for communication management strategies are discussed.\ud \ud Originality/value - Originality stems from being one of the first papers to use Framing and Prospect Theory in a food crisis situation, in which both risk and framing are operationalised in different ways and the risk was not specified by the researcher. Also, unlike previous research identical numerical facts were framed in a positive, negative or neutral light by changing the wording.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Augustine, N.R. (1995), “Managing the crisis you tried to prevent”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 73, No. 6, pp. 147-158.
    • Breakwell, G.M. (2000), “Risk communications: Factors affecting impact”, British Medical Bulletin, Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 110-120.
    • Brown, R. (1988), Group Processes: Dynamic Within and Between Groups, Blackwell.
    • Charlebois, S. and Elliott, G. (2009), “Mining for mindsets: The conceptual anatomy of a successful crisis communication strategy in mining”, Journal of Marketing Communications, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 55-71.
    • Coppola, D. (2005), “'Gripped by fear': Public risk perception and the Washington, DC sniper”, Disaster Prevention and Management, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 32-54 Cope, S. Fewer, L.J., Houghton, J., Rowe, G., Fischer A. R. H., de Jonge, J. (2010), “Consumer perception of best practice in food risk communication and managemepnt: Implications for risk analysis policy”, Food Policy, Vol. 35, pp. 349-357 Eldridge, J., Kitzinger, J., Philo, G., Reilly, J., Macintyre, S. and Miller, D. (1997), “The re-emergence of BSE: The impact on public beliefs and behaviour”, Newsletter of the ESRC Research Programme on Risk and Human Behaviour, Issue 3.
    • Fagley, N.S. and Miller, P.M. (1997), “Framing effects and arenas of choice: Your money or your life?”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol.
    • 71, No. 3, pp. 355-373.
    • Gallagher, K. M. & Updegraff, J. A. (2012), “Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: a meta-analytic review”, Annals of behavioral medicine, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 101-116.
    • Hatton C. (2013) http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-23316125 accessed 12.12.14 Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979), “Prospect Theory: An analysis of decision under risk”, Econometrica, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 263-291.
    • Kasperson, R. E., Renn, O. and Slovic, P. (1988), “Social amplification of risk: a conceptual framework”, Risk Analysis, Vol. 8, pp. 177-187.
    • Kitzinger, J. and Reilly, J. (1997), “Media and expert constructions of risk”, Newsletter of the ESRC Research Programme on Risk and Human Behaviour, Issue 1.
    • Knox, B. (2000), “Consumer perception and understanding of risk from food”, British Medical Bulletin, Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 97-109.
    • Kühberger, A. (1998), “The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis”, Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 75, No. 1, pp. 23-55.
    • Li, S. (1998), “Can the conditions governing the framing effect be determined?”, Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 19, pp. 131-153.
    • Lichter, S. and Amundson, D. (1996), Food for thought: Reporting of diet, nutrition and food safety May 1995-July 1995, Center for Media and Public Affairs, Washington DC.
    • MacCrimmon, K.R. and Wehrung, D.A. (1985), “A portfolio of risk measures”, Theory and Decision, Vol. 19, pp. 1-29.
    • Mahon, D. & Cowan, C. (2004), “Irish consumers' perception of food safety risk in minced beef”, British Food Journal, Vol. 106, No. 4, pp 301-312.
    • Mitchell, V.-W. (1998), “A role for consumer risk perceptions in grocery retailing”, British Food Journal, Vol. 100, No. 4, pp. 171-183.
    • Mitchell, V.-W. and McGoldrick, P.J. (1996), “Consumers' risk-reduction strategies: A review and synthesis”, The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 1-33.
    • van Dijk, H., van Kleef, E., Owen, H., & Frewer, L. J. (2012), “Consumer preferences regarding food-related risk-benefit messages”, British Food Journal, Vol. 114, No. 3, perception to risky choice”, Management Science, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 123-144.
    • Wooten, L.P. and James, E.H. (2008), “Linking Crisis Management and Leadership
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article