LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Jones, David Albert (2015)
Publisher: Sage
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: 176, 111, 170

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: embryonic structures
The British Parliament has recently approved regulations to allow techniques ‘to prevent the transmission of serious mitochondrial disease from a mother to her child’. The regulations term these techniques ‘mitochondrial donation’, but in the popular media, the issue has been discussed under the heading of ‘three parent’ babies or ‘three parent’ embryos. This paper examines the language of the debate, with particular reference to one of the techniques approved. It concludes that the terminology of ‘mitochondrial donation’ is scientifically inaccurate and ethically misleading, while the popular media description of ‘three parent’ embryos is broadly accurate, at least for one technique. This latter phrase also has the great merit, from an ethical perspective, of drawing attention to the ‘other woman’, the egg donor. She takes risks with her health in order to provide the egg which supplies the body of the embryo. Without her, this embryo simply would not exist.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 5. Watermeyer R, Rowe G. Evaluation of Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA): Mitochondrial replacement consultation. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, 2013: 78.
    • 6. Knapton S. Three-parent baby technique no more sinister than blood transfusion, says Robert Winston. Telegraph 1 Feb 2015.
    • 7. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Mitochondrial Donation) Regulations 2015, section 4.
    • 8. Nuffield Council on Human Bioethics. Novel techniques for the prevention of mitochondrial DNA disorders: an ethical review. London: Nuffield Council 2012: 90 (5.13).
    • 9. Nuffield Council on Human Bioethics. Novel techniques for the prevention of mitochondrial DNA disorders: an ethical review. London: Nuffield Council 2012: 53 (4.5).
    • 10. Nuffield Council for Bioethics. Emerging techniques to prevent inherited mitochondrial disorders: ethical issues, London: Nuffield Council 2012, Response by the Medical Research Council and the Wellcome Trust.
    • 11. Wellcome Trust Centre for Mitochondrial Research. Healing broken batteries. Wellcome Trust, Published on 15 Sep 2012 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sr7Jnr9qn44 (accessed 25 March 2015)
    • 17. Jones DA. The Soul of the Embryo: An Enquiry into the Status of the Human Embryo in the Christian Tradition. London: Continuum, 2004: 160-74.
    • 18. Rights for surrogate mothers. https://www.gov.uk/rights-for-surrogate-mothers (accessed 25 March 2015)
    • 19. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 as amended, section 31ZA.
    • 20. Barber S, Border P. Mitochondrial Donation. Commons Library Standard Note Published 29 January 2015 | Standard notes SN06833: 1.
    • 21. Wellcome Trust Q&A: Mitochondrial Donation http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/stellent/groups/corporatesite/@policy_communications/docu ments/web_document/wtp057782.pdf (accessed 25 March 2015)
    • 22. Newman SA. FDA asked to approve creation of genetically modified children. Huffington Post: The Blog. 20 February 2014 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stuart-a-newman/fdaasked-to-approve-crea_b_4809876.html (accessed 25 March 2015)
    • 27. Reinhardt K, Dowling D, Morrow E. Mitochondrial Replacement, Evolution and the Clinic. Science 20 September 2013;341(6152): 1345-1346.
    • 28. Morrow E. Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Mitochondrial Donation) Regulations 2015 Written Evidence: 35.
    • 29. Dialogue by Design. Medical frontiers: debating mitochondria replacement, Annex IV: Summary of the 2012 open consultation questionnaire. Prepared by Dialogue by Design, 2013: 25.
    • 30. Sykes B. The Seven Daughters of Eve. WW Norton & Company Inc, 2002.
    • 31. Callaway E. Genetic Adam and Eve did not live too far apart in time: Studies re-date 'Ychromosome Adam' and 'mitochondrial Eve'. Nature News 06 August 2013. doi:10.1038/nature.2013.13478
    • 32. Neumann-Held EM, Rehmann-Sutter C, eds. Genes in Development: Re-Reading the Molecular Paradigm. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2006.
    • 33. Vaizey E. Was Parliament correct to vote to let 'babies with three parents' be born?: YES. Oxford Mail. 11 February 2015.
    • 36. Nuffield Council on Human Bioethics. Novel techniques for the prevention of mitochondrial DNA disorders: an ethical review. London: Nuffield Council 2012: 88 (5.2).
    • 37. Border P. Preventing Mitochondrial Disease. POSTnote 431 March 2013, Updated October 2014: 4.
    • 38. Jayaprakasan K, Herbert M, Moody E et al. Estimating the risks of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): implications for egg donation for research. Hum Fertil 2007; 10. 3: 183- 187. doi:10.1080/14647270601021743
    • 39. Steward RG, Shah AA, Yeh JS et al. Oocyte number as a predictor for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and live birth: an analysis of 256,381 in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril 2014; 101.4: 967-973. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.12.026 (accessed 25 March 2015)
    • 40. Camporesi S, Boniolo G. Fearing a non-existing Minotaur? The ethical challenges of research on cytoplasmic hybrid embryos. J Med Ethics 2008;34:821-825: 823. doi:10.1136/jme.2008.024877
    • 41. HFEA Chief Executive's letters: CE(11)02 - donation review: preparing for implementation, available at: http://www.hfea.gov.uk/6855.html (accessed 25 March 2015) 22
    • 46. Parfit D. Reasons and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984: 355.
    • 47. Dialogue by Design. Medical frontiers: debating mitochondria replacement, Annex IV: Summary of the 2012 open consultation questionnaire. Prepared by Dialogue by Design, 2013: 47.
    • 48. Department of Health Review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act: Proposals for revised legislation (including establishment of the Regulatory Authority for Tissue and Embryos) December 2006, The Stationery Office.
    • 49. Department of Health Human Tissue and Embryos (Draft) Bill, May 2007, Section 35A.
    • 50. Jones DA. Is the creation of admixed embryos 'an offense against human dignity'? Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 16.1 (2010): 87-114.
    • 55. Jones DA. What does the British public think about human-animal hybrid embryos? J Med Ethics 2009;35:168-170 doi:10.1136/jme.2008.026336
    • 56. Wellcome Trust Press release. Techniques to prevent transmission of mitochondrial diseases to be assessed in new £5.8 million Wellcome Trust centre. 19 January 2012. http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/News/Media-office/Press-releases/2012/WTVM054145.htm (accessed 25 March 2015)
    • 57. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Call for evidence on mitochondrial donation. News 19 January 2012 http://nuffieldbioethics.org/news/2012/call-for-evidence-on-mitochondrial-donation/ (accessed 25 March 2015)
    • 58. HFEA Press release. HFEA to consult on ethics of 'mitochondria transfer'. 19 January 2012 http://www.hfea.gov.uk/6898.html (accessed 25 March 2015)
    • 59. Nuffield Council on Human Bioethics. Novel techniques for the prevention of mitochondrial DNA disorders: an ethical review. London: Nuffield Council 2012: 88-89 (5.7).
    • 60. Nuffield Council on Human Bioethics. Novel techniques for the prevention of mitochondrial DNA disorders: an ethical review. London: Nuffield Council 2012, 5.8: 89.
    • 65. Sheikh S. Medical frontiers: Debating mitochondria replacement, Annex II: deliberative public workshops. Office for Public management, March 2013: 20, figures taken from the graph.
    • 66. Sheikh S. Medical frontiers: Debating mitochondria replacement, Annex II: deliberative public workshops. Office for Public management, March 2013: 21.
    • 67. Department of Health. Mitochondrial Donation: Government response to the consultation on draft regulations to permit the use of new treatment techniques to prevent the transmission of a serious mitochondrial disease from mother to child. July 2014, Annex B: 45-46.
    • 68. Department of Health. Mitochondrial Donation: Government response to the consultation on draft regulations to permit the use of new treatment techniques to prevent the transmission of a serious mitochondrial disease from mother to child. July 2014: 27.
    • 69. Dialogue by Design. Medical frontiers: debating mitochondria replacement, Annex IV: Summary of the 2012 open consultation questionnaire. Prepared by Dialogue by Design, 2013: 45, comment by an individual with personal experience of donor conception.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

  • WT

Cite this article