LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Gautier, Chantal
Publisher: Employee Assistance Professionals Association
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: UOW10
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Anderson, C.I., and P.L. Hunsaker. 1985. Why there's romancing at the office and why it's everybody's problem. Personnel, 67 (2): 57-63.
    • Brown, T.J., and E.R. Allgeier. 1995. Managers' perceptions of workplace romances: An interview study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 10 (2): 169- 176.
    • Clarke, L. 2006. Sexual relationships and sexual conduct in the workplace. Legal Studies, 26 (3): 347-368.
    • Cropper, C.M. 1997. That unwritten code against fraternization: Companies prefer not to ask or tell. New York Times: 26 October.
    • Devine, I., and D. Markiewicz. 1990. Crosssex relationships at work and the impact of gender stereotypes. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 333-338.
    • Fisher, A.B. 1994. Getting comfortable with couples in the workplace. Fortune, 130 (7): 70-75.
    • Foley, S., and G.N. Powell. 1999. Not all is fair in love and work: co-workers' preferences for and responses to managerial interventions regarding workplace romances. Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 20, 1043-1056.
    • Kakabadse, A., and K Kakabadse. 2004. Intimacy: An international survey of the sex lives of people at work. London: Plagrave.
    • Karl, K.A., and C.L. Sutton. 2000. An examination of the perceived fairness of workplace romance policies. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14 (3): 429- 442.
    • Lobel, S.A., R.E. Quinn, L. St. Clair, and A. Warfield. 1994. Love without sex: The impact of psychological intimacy between men and women at work. Organizational Dynamics, 23 (1): 5-16.
    • Law firm Peninsula and Portfolio Payroll. 2002. U.K. offices simmering with passion.
    • Mainiero, L.A. 1986. A review and analysis of power dynamics in organizational romances. Academy of Management Review, 11 (4): 750-762.
    • McLean Parks, J., D.L. Kidder, and D.G. Gallagher. 1998. Fitting square pegs into round holes: mapping the domain of contingent work arrangements onto the psychological contract. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 19, 697-730.
    • Newcomb, T. 1956. The prediction of interpersonal attraction. American Psychologist, 11, 575-586.
    • Overman, S. 1998. When labour leads to love. HR Focus, 75 (11): 15.
    • Pierce, C.A., D. Byrne, and H. Aguinis. 1996. Attraction in organizations: a model of workplace romance. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 17, 5-32.
    • Powell, G.N. 2001. Workplace romances between senior-level executives and lower-level employees: An issue of work disruption and gender. Human Relations, 54 (11): 1519-1544.
    • Quinn, R.E. 1977. Coping with Cupid: The formation, impact, and management of romantic relationships in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22 (1): 30-45.
    • Rapp, E. 1992. Dangerous Liaisons. Working Women, 56-61.
    • Society for Human Resource Management. 2006. Workplace Romance Poll Findings. A study by the Society for Human Resource Management and CareerJournal.com.
    • Society for Human Resource Management 2002. A fine romance, but no policies. Survey report.
    • Schor, J.B. 1991. The overworked American: The unexpected decline of leisure. New York: Basic Books.
    • Shaw, M.E. (1971). Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behaviour. New York: McGraw Hill.
    • Sternberg, R.J. 1986. A triangle theory of love. Psychological Review, 93, 119-135.
    • Top Sante. 2001. The U.K. Top Sante National Women and Work Survey.
    • Vault.com. 2003. Office Romance Survey.
    • Zajonc, R.B. 1968. Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph Supplement, 9 (2, Pt. 2), 1-27.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article