LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Cinderby, Steven; Forrester, John Martin (2016)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
This paper reports on the findings developed by a funded project within the UK Rural Economy and Land Use Programme: ‘Managing borderlands: adaptive decision making amongst specialists and non-specialists’. The project focuses specifically on the development of a nested-scale participatory GIS (PGIS) method to identify spatially local perceptions and experiential knowledge of the risk and vulnerability of two catchments in the Scottish–English Borders. The method attempts to move beyond mapping risk towards the co-design of possible solutions. This will highlight the potential for improved inclusion of local perspectives on risk afforded by using PGIS mapping approaches in the UK context. The potential of the approach to generate co-designed community preferences leading to more resilient solutions (particularly in terms of social and economic consequences) to environmental change will also be discussed.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Brabham, D.C., 2009. Crowdsourcing the Public Participation Process for Planning Projects. Planning Theory, 8(3), pp.242 262. Available at: http://plt.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/1473095209104824 [Accessed July 24, 2012].
    • Catney, P. et al., 2013. Big society, little justice? Community renewable energy and the politics of localism. Local Environment, (May), pp.1 16. Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13549839.2013.792044 [Accessed May 24, 2013].
    • Chess, C. & Purcell, K., 1999. Policy Analysis Public Participation and the Environment : Do We Know What Works ? Environmental Science & Technology, (732), pp.2685 2692. -to- ory Geographic Information Systems (P-GIS) for inclusive urban design in UK cities. Area, 42(2), pp.239 251. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2009.00912.x [Accessed October 25, 2010].
    • Cinderby, S., Snell, C. & Forrester, J., 2008. Participatory GIS and its application in governance: the example of air quality and the implications for noise pollution. Local Environment, 13(4), pp.309 320. Available at: http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&doi=10.1080/13549830701803265&magi c=crossref||D404A21C5BB053405B1A640AFFD44AE3 [Accessed November 27, 2010].
    • Cope, M. & Elwood, S., 2009. Qualitative GIS: A Mixed Methods Approach First. M. Cope & S. Elwood, eds., Sage.
    • Cornwall, A., 2002. Locating citizen participation. IDS bulletin, Volume 33(Issue 2), pp.i x. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2002.tb00016.x/abstract [Accessed June 7, 2013].
    • Davies, G. & Dwyer, C., 2007. Qualitative methods II: minding the gap. Progress in Human Geography, 44(0), pp.1 11. Available at: http://phg.sagepub.com/content/early/2007/12/18/0309132507084403.full.pdf [Accessed August 22, 2013].
    • Department for Communities and Local Government, 2011. A plain English guide to the Localism Bill,
    • Goodchild, M.., 2007. Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, pp.1 15. Available at: http://www.springerlink.com/index/h013jk125081j628.pdf [Accessed February 3, 2012].
    • Goodchild, M.F., 2011. Virtual Geographic Environments as Collective Constructions. In H. Lin & M. Batty, eds. Virtual Geographic Environments. ESRI, pp. 15 24.
    • Gura, T., 2013. Citizen science: Amateur experts. Nature, 496(7444), pp.259 261. Available at: http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nj7444-259a [Accessed April 10, 2013].
    • Hsueh, P. & Melville, P., 2009. Data quality from crowdsourcing: a study of annotation selection criteria. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2009 Workshop on Active Learning for Natural Language Processing. pp. 27 35. Available at: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1564137 [Accessed March 2, 2012].
    • John, P., 2012. Nudging Citizens Towards LocaLism ?, The British Academy.
    • Kingston, R. et al., 2000. Web-based public participation geographical information systems: an aid to local environmental decision-making. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 24(2), pp.109 125. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0198971599000496.
    • Kyem, P.A.K. & Saku, J.C., 2009. Web-Based GIS and the Future of Participatory GIS Applications within Local and Indigenous Communities. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 38, pp.1 16. Available at: http://www.ejisdc.org/ojs2.../index.php/ejisdc/article/view/584 [Accessed June 9, 2011].
    • Mooney, P. & Corcoran, P., 2011. Can Volunteered Geographic Information Be a Participant in 122.
    • Available at: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-22285-6_13 [Accessed July 17, 2013].
    • Pavlovskaya, M., 2009. Non-Quantitative GIS. In M. Cope & S. Elwood, eds. Qualitative GIS: A Mixed Methods Approach. Sage, pp. 13 37.
    • Pavlovskaya, M., 2006. Theorizing with GIS: a tool for critical geographies? Environment and Planning A, 38(11), pp.2003 2020. Available at: http://www.envplan.com/abstract.cgi?id=a37326 [Accessed August 15, 2012].
    • Pickles, J., 2006. Ground Truth 1995-2005. Transactions in GIS, 10(5), pp.763 772. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1467-9671.2006.01027.x.
    • Shaffer, P., 2013. Q-Squared: Combining Qualitative & Quantitaive Approaches in Poverty Analysis First., Oxford University Press.
    • Silvertown, J., 2009. A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in ecology & evolution, 24(9), pp.467 71. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19586682.
    • Stern, P.C. & Fineberg, H. V., 1996. Understanding Risk:Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society, The National Academies Press. Available at: http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=5138.
    • Stevens, M. & Maisonneuve, N., 2009. NoiseTube User Guide. , (November), pp.1 33.
    • White, S., 1996. Depoliticising development: the uses and abuses of participation. Development in practice, (June 2013), pp.37 41. Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0961452961000157564 [Accessed June 7, 2013].
    • Willis, K.S. et al., 2009. A comparison of spatial knowledge acquisition with maps and mobile maps. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 33(2), pp.100 110. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0198971509000064 [Accessed February 16, 2011].
    • Yuille, A., 2011. Big Society , localism and the local environment Briefing paper 54,
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article