LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Locatelli, G; Palerma, E; Mancini, M (2015)
Publisher: Elsevier
Journal: Energy
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Energy(all), Pollution
Power plants, such as wind farms, that harvest renewable energy are increasing their share of the energy portfolio in several countries, including the United Kingdom. Their inability to match demand power profiles is stimulating an increasing need for large ESP (Energy Storage Plants), capable of balancing their instability and shifting power produced during low demand to peak periods. This paper presents and applies an innovative methodology to assess the economics of ESP utilising UK electricity price data, resulting in three key findings. Firstly the paper provides a methodology to assess the trade-off “reserve capacity vs. profitability” and the possibility of establishing the “optimum size capacity”. The optimal reserve size capacity maximizing the NPV (Net Present Value) is smaller than the optimum size capacity minimizing the subsidies. This is not an optimal result since it complicates the incentive scheme to align investors and policy makers' interests. Secondly, without subsidies, none of the existing ESP technologies are economically sustainable. However, subsidies are a relatively small percentage of the average price of electricity in UK. Thirdly, the possibility of operating ESP as both as a reserve and do price arbitrage was identified as a mean of decreasing subsidies for the ESP technologies.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] IEA. Renewable energy. 2012. Medium Term Market Report.
    • [2] Boyle G. Renewable electricity and the grid: the challenge of variability. Routledge; 2009. p. 244.
    • [3] Somerville WM. Fair isle renewed. 2010. Available at: http://www.fairisle.org. uk/FIECo/renewed/control.htm.
    • [4] Østergaard PA. Comparing electricity, heat and biogas storages' impacts on renewable energy integration. Energy Jan. 2012;37(1):255e62.
    • [5] UK Government. National renewable energy action plan for the United Kingdom. 2010.
    • [6] The Royal Academy of Engineering. The costs of generating electricity. 2004.
    • [7] Burton T, Jenkins N, Sharpe D, Bossanyi E. Wind energy handbook. 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell; 2011. p. 780.
    • [8] Pearre Nathaniel S, Swan Lukas G. Technoeconomic feasibility of grid storage: mapping electrical services and energy storage technologies. Applied Energy 1 January 2015;137:501e10. ISSN 0306-2619, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. apenergy.2014.04.050.
    • [9] International Energy Agency. Variability of wind power and other renewables: management options and strategies. 2005.
    • [10] MacDonald M. The carbon trust & DTI renewables network impact study annex 4: intermittency literature survey & roadmap. The Carbon Trust & DTI; 2003.
    • [11] Adams T, Cadieux F. Wind power in Ontario: quantifying the benefits of geographic diversity. In: 2nd Climate Change Technology Conference, May 12e15, 2009.
    • [12] Lange M, Focken U. Physical approach to short-term wind power prediction. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2006.
    • [13] Milborrow D. Penalties for intermittent sources of energy. London: Cabinet Off.; 2001. p. 1e17.
    • [14] Holttinen H, Meibom P, Orths A, Van Hulle F, Lange B. Design and operation of power systems with large amounts of wind power. In: Global Wind Power Conference, September 18e21; 2006.
    • [15] Holttinen H, Meibom P, Orths A, Lange B, O'Malley M, Tande JO, et al. Impacts of large amounts of wind power on design and operation of power systems, results of IEA collaboration. Wind Energy Mar. 2011;14(2):179e92.
    • [16] UK National Grid. National Grid UK. 2014. Available at: http://www2. nationalgrid.com/uk/.
    • [17] International Energy Agency, OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, and E. Agency. Projected costs of generating electricity 2010. Energy 2010;118(Suppl.):218. no. 7.
    • [18] International Renewable Energy Agency. Electricity storage. 2012.
    • [19] Gao D, Jiang D, Liu P, Li Z, Hu S, Xu H. An integrated energy storage system based on hydrogen storage: process configuration and case studies with wind power. Energy Mar. 2014;66:332e41.
    • [20] Carton JG, Olabi AG. Wind/hydrogen hybrid systems: opportunity for Ireland's wind resource to provide consistent sustainable energy supply. Energy Dec. 2010;35(12):4536e44.
    • [21] Kroniger D, Madlener R. Hydrogen storage for wind parks: a real options evaluation for an optimal investment in more flexibility. Appl Energy Dec. 2014;136:931e46.
    • [22] Beccali M, Brunone S, Finocchiaro P, Galletto JM. Method for size optimisation of large windehydrogen systems with high penetration on power grids. Appl Energy Feb. 2013;102:534e44.
    • [23] Olabi AG. 100% sustainable energy. Energy Dec. 2014;77:1e5.
    • [24] Milligan M, Donohoo P, Lew D, Ela E. Operating reserves and wind power integration: an international comparison. In: Proc 9th Int; 2010.
    • [25] International Energy Agency. Prospects for large-scale energy storage in decarbonised power grids. 2009.
    • [26] US Department of Energy. DOE global energy storage database. 2014. Available at: http://www.energystorageexchange.org/projects/search.
    • [27] Zach K, Auer H, Lettner G. Report summarizing the current status, role and costs of energy storage technologies. 2012.
    • [28] Denholm P, Ela E, Kirby B, Milligan M. The role of energy storage with renewable electricity generation. 2010.
    • [29] EPRI-DOE. Electricity storage handbook. 2013.
    • [30] van der Linden S. Bulk energy storage potential in the USA, current developments and future prospects. Energy Dec. 2006;31(15):3446e57.
    • [31] Pieper C, Rubel H. Revisiting energy storage. 2011.
    • [32] Zhao Haoran, Wu Qiuwei, Hu Shuju, Xu Honghua, Rasmussen Claus Nygaard. Review of energy storage system for wind power integration support. Applied Energy 1 January 2015;137:545e53. ISSN 0306-2619, http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.103.
    • [33] Kaldellis JK, Zafirakis D. Optimum energy storage techniques for the improvement of renewable energy sources-based electricity generation economic efficiency. Energy Dec. 2007;32(12):2295e305.
    • [34] Schoenung S. Energy storage systems cost update e a study for the DOE energy storage systems program. 2011.
    • [35] International Energy Agency. Prospects for energy storage in decarbonised power grids. 2009.
    • [36] EPRI-DOE. Handbook of energy storage for transmission & distribution applications. December 2003. p. 512.
    • [37] EIA. Updated capital cost estimates for utility scale electricity generating plants. 2013.
    • [38] Succar S, Williams R. Compressed air energy storage: theory, resources, and applications for wind power. 2008.
    • [39] Zunft S, Jakiel C, Koller M, Bullough C. Adiabatic compressed air energy storage for the grid integration of wind power. In: Sixth International Workshop on Large-scale Integration of Wind Power and Transmission Networks for Offshore WindfarmsOctober; 2006. p. 26e8.
    • [40] Department of Energy & Climate Change. Fossil fuel price projections. 2012.
    • [41] Ter-Gazarian AG. Energy storage for power systems. Stevenage: The Institution of Engineering and Technology; 2011. p. 292.
    • [42] UK National Grid. Short term operating reserve annual market report 2012/ 13. 2013.
    • [43] Kloess M, Zach K. Electrical power and energy systems bulk electricity storage technologies for load-leveling operation e an economic assessment for the Austrian and German power market. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 2014;59:111e22.
    • [44] Sigrist L, Lobato E, Rouco L. Electrical power and energy systems energy storage systems providing primary reserve and peak shaving in small isolated power systems: an economic assessment. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 2013;53:675e83.
    • [45] Madlener R, Latz J. Economics of centralized and decentralized compressed air energy storage for enhanced grid integration of wind power. Appl Energy Jan. 2013;101:299e309.
    • [46] Loisel R. Power system flexibility with electricity storage technologies: a technicaleeconomic assessment of a large-scale storage facility. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst Nov. 2012;42(1):542e52.
    • [47] de Boer HS, Grond L, Moll H, Benders R. The application of power-to-gas, pumped hydro storage and compressed air energy storage in an electricity system at different wind power penetration levels. Energy Jun. 2014;72: 360e70.
    • [48] UK National Grid 2014. Available: http://www2.nationalgrid.com/UK/services.
    • [49] U.S. Department of Energy. Grid energy storage. 2013.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article