Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Reimers, S. (2009)
Publisher: ESRC Centre for Economic Learning and Social Evolution
Journal: Judgment and Decision Making
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: BF, framing, biases.NAKeywords, tax, framing, psychology, judgment, heuristics, biases, PSYCHOLOGY, ATTITUDES, DECISION, POLICIES, TAX, BF1-990, Economics as a science, tax, Tax, framing, psychology, judgment, heuristics, biases, Psychology, judgment, heuristics, tax, framing, psychology, judgment, heuristics, biases., HB71-74

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: health care economics and organizations
Taxation policy is driven by many factors, including public opinion, but little research has examined the strength and stability of the public's taxation preferences. This paper demonstrates one way in which preferences for progressiveness depend on the framing of the question asked. Participants indicated how they would share a fixed tax burden between two individuals who earned different amounts of money, either by adjusting the amount of tax paid by the two individuals, or by adjusting the amount of post-tax income retained. The units in which tax was described --- amount of money or percentage tax rate --- were manipulated orthogonally. There was a strong metric effect: Participants favored progressiveness more when tax was described as a percentage rather than amount. However, there was also a clear interaction: for amounts, participants favored progressiveness significantly more when considering post-tax money retained rather than tax paid; for percentages, no such effect was found.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Alpizar, F., Carlsson, F., & Johansson-Stenman, O. (2005). How much do we care about absolute versus relative income and consumption? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 56, 405-421.
    • De Martino, B., Kumaran, D., Seymour, B., et al. (2006). Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain, Science, 313, 684-687.
    • Edlund, J. (2003). Attitudes towards taxation: Ignorant and incoherent? Scandinavian Political Studies, 26, 145-167.
    • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
    • Keen, M., Kim, Y., & Varsano, R. (2008). The “flat tax(es)”: principles and experience. International Tax and Public Finance, 15, 712-751.
    • Kirchler, E. (2007). The economic psychology of tax behaviour. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    • Lewis, A. (1978). Perceptions of tax rates. British Tax Review, 6, 358-366.
    • McCaffery, E. J. & Baron, J. (2004). Framing and taxation: Evaluation of tax policies involving household composition, Journal of Economic Psychology, 25, 679-705.
    • McCaffery, E. J. & Baron, J. (2005). The political psychology of redistribution, UCLA Law Review, 52, 1745-1792.
    • McCaffery, E. J. & Baron, J. (2006a). Thinking about tax, Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12, 106-135.
    • McCaffery, E. J. & Baron, J. (2006b). Isolation effects and the neglect of indirect effects of fiscal policies, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 289-302.
    • Musgrave, R. A. & Musgrave, P. B. (1989). Public finance in theory and practice. Fifth edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    • Reimers, S., & Stewart, N. (2007). Adobe Flash as a medium for online experimentation: A test of RT measurement capabilities. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 365-370.
    • Roberts, M. L., Hite, P. A., & Bradley, C. F. (1994). Understanding attitudes toward progressive taxation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 58, 165-190.
    • Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article