Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Longobardi, Ernesto; Polito, Vito; Cardiff University (2011)
Publisher: Cardiff University
Languages: English
Types: Book
Subjects: HB
This paper studies the effectiveness of corporate tax incentives in reducing the effective tax rate (ETR) on income from capital to stimulate business investment during economic downturns. We focus on tax rate incentives (TRIs), such as corporate tax rate cuts, and tax base incentives (TBIs), such as increased capital allowances. The standard economic theory states that TRIs reduce the ETR by decreasing tax payments on corporate profits. TBIs instead reduce the ETR as they defer firms' tax payments, in turn increasing the present value of dividend distribution. However, this theory does not consider that, in reality, firms face accounting constraints preventing any distribution of cash flows arising from TBIs. For this reason, the standard economic analysis overstates the benefit of any TBI relative to that of TRIs. The paper incorporates accounting constraints on dividend policy into the model for the computation of the ETR and employs the new model to recalculate ETRs in the US and in the UK during 1980-2010. The empirical results confirm that the benefit of TBIs is significantly overstated by the standard theory, and tax rate cuts are more effective in reducing the ETR. We show that this result holds regardless of the form of investment finance (retained earning, new equity and debt), the type capital asset (building and plant and machinery), the level of capital income taxation (corporate and shareholders), and the value of accounting depreciation relative to economic depreciation.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Alexander, D. and S. Archer (2009). 2009 International Accounting/Financial Reporting Standard Guide. CCH Incorporated.
    • Backus, D., HeUiksen, E. and K. Storesletten (2008). “Taxes and the global allocation of capital”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 55, 48–61.
    • Boadway, R. W. and N. Bruce (1979). “Depreciation and Interest Deductions and the E¤ect of the Corporation Income Tax on Investment”, Journal of Public Economics, 11, 1, 93–105.
    • Burnham, P. and L. Ozanne (2006). “Distortions from Partial Tax Reform Revealed through E¤ective Tax Rates”, National Tax Journal, 59, 3, 611-630.
    • Devereux, M. P. and R. Gri¢ th (1998a) “Taxes and the Location of Production: Evidence from a Panel of US Multinationals” Journal of Public Economics, 68, 3, 335-367.
    • Devereux, M. P. and R. Gri¢ th (2003). “Evaluating Tax Policy for Location Decisions”, International Tax and Public Finance, 10, 2, 107–126.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article