LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Le Poidevin, R. (2004)
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
[FIRST PARAGRAPH]\ud \ud Consider a straight line on a flat surface running from point A to C and passing though B. Suppose the distance AB to be four inches, and the distance BC to be six inches. We can infer that the distance AC is ten inches. Of all geometrical inferences, this is surely one of the simplest. Of course, things are a little more complicated if the surface is not flat. If A, B and C are points on a sphere, then the shortest distance between A and C may be smaller (it may even be zero). We can make our inference immune from concerns about non-Euclidean spaces, however, by qualifying it as follows: if AB = n, and BC = m, then, in the direction A⇒B⇒C, the distance AC is n + m. This is apparently entirely trivial. But trivial truths can hide significant ontological ones. Let us translate our mathematical example to the physical world, and suppose A, B and C to be points, still in a straight line, but now at the centre of gravity of three physical objects:
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Butterfield, J. 1984. Relationism and Possible Worlds. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35: 101-116.
    • Dainton, B. 2001. Time and Space. Chesham: Acumen.
    • Earman, J. 1989. World Enough and Space-Time: Absolute versus Relational Theories of Space and Time. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    • Grünbaum, A. 1970. Space, Time and Falsifiability. Philosophy of Science 37: 469- 588.
    • Loux, M. J. 2002. Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction. London: Routledge.
    • Nerlich, G. 1994. The Shape of Space, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Newton-Smith, W.H. 1980. The Structure of Time. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    • Simons, P. 2000. Truth-Maker Optimalism. Logique & Analyse 169-170: 17-41.
    • Sklar, L. 1985. Philosophy and Spacetime Physics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article