Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Ortega-Martorell, Sandra; Ruiz, H?ctor; Vellido, Alfredo; Olier, Iv?n; Romero, Enrique; Juli?-Sap?, Margarida; Mart?n, Jos? D.; Jarman, Ian H.; Ar?s, Carles; Lisboa, Paulo J. G. (2013)
Publisher: Public Library of Science
Journal: PLoS ONE
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: RC0254, Algorithms, Glioblastoma multiforme, Applied Mathematics, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Research Article, Prototypes, Computing Methods, Signal Processing, Mathematics, Radiology, Magnetic resonance spectroscopy, Diagnostic Radiology, Oncology, Computer Science, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis, Data acquisition, Cancers and Neoplasms, RC0321, Neurological Tumors, Medicine, Engineering, Basic Cancer Research, Q, R, Mathematical Computing, Science, Lipid signaling, R1
Background: The clinical investigation of human brain tumors often starts with a non-invasive imaging study, providing \ud information about the tumor extent and location, but little insight into the biochemistry of the analyzed tissue. Magnetic \ud Resonance Spectroscopy can complement imaging by supplying a metabolic fingerprint of the tissue. This study analyses \ud single-voxel magnetic resonance spectra, which represent signal information in the frequency domain. Given that a single \ud voxel may contain a heterogeneous mix of tissues, signal source identification is a relevant challenge for the problem of\ud tumor type classification from the spectroscopic signal.\ud Methodology/Principal Findings: Non-negative matrix factorization techniques have recently shown their potential for the \ud identification of meaningful sources from brain tissue spectroscopy data. In this study, we use a convex variant of these \ud methods that is capable of handling negatively-valued data and generating sources that can be interpreted as tumor class \ud prototypes. A novel approach to convex non-negative matrix factorization is proposed, in which prior knowledge about \ud class information is utilized in model optimization. Class specific information is integrated into this semi-supervised process \ud by setting the metric of a latent variable space where the matrix factorization is carried out. The reported experimental \ud study comprises 196 cases from different tumor types drawn from two international, multi-center databases. The results \ud indicate that the proposed approach outperforms a purely unsupervised process by achieving near perfect correlation of the extracted sources with the mean spectra of the tumor types. It also improves tissue type classification. \ud Conclusions/Significance: We show that source extraction by unsupervised matrix factorization benefits from the\ud integration of the available class information, so operating in a semi-supervised learning manner, for discriminative source identification and brain tumor labeling from single-voxel spectroscopy data. We are confident that the proposed methodology has wider applicability for biomedical signal processing.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Howe FA, Opstad KS (2003) 1H MR spectroscopy of brain tumours and masses. NMR in Biomedicine 16: 123-131.
    • 2. Julia`-Sape´ M, Acosta D, Majo´s C, Moreno-Torres A, Wesseling P, et al. (2006) Comparison between neuroimaging classifications and histopathological diagnoses using an international multicenter brain tumor magnetic resonance imaging database. Journal of Neurosurgery 105: 6-14.
    • 3. Law M, Yang S, Wang H, Babb JS, Johnson G, et al. (2003) Glioma Grading: Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Values of Perfusion MR Imaging and Proton MR Spectroscopic Imaging Compared with Conventional MR Imaging. American Journal of Neuroradiology 24: 1989-1998.
    • 4. Julia`-Sape´ M, Coronel I, Majo´s C, Candiota AP, Serrallonga M, et al. (2012) Prospective diagnostic performance evaluation of single-voxel 1H MRS for typing and grading of brain tumours. NMR in biomedicine 25: 661-673.
    • 5. Murphy M, Loosemore A, Clifton AG, Howe FA, Tate AR, et al. (2002) The contribution of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1HMRS) to clinical brain tumour diagnosis. British journal of neurosurgery 16: 329-334.
    • 6. Pe´rez-Ruiz A, Julia`-Sape´ M, Mercadal G, Olier I, Majo´s C, et al. (2010) The INTERPRET Decision-Support System version 3.0 for evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy data from human brain tumours and other abnormal brain masses. BMC Bioinformatics 11: 581.
    • 7. Sa´ez C, Garc´ıa-Go´mez JM, Vicente J, Tortajada S, Esparza M, et al. (2008) A generic decision support system featuring an assembled view of predictive models for magnetic resonance and clinical data. 25th Annual Scientific Meeting of the European Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Biology. Valencia, Spain.
    • 8. Gibb A, Easton J, Davies N, Sun YU, MacPherson L, et al. (2011) The development of a graphical user interface, functional elements and classifiers for the non-invasive characterization of childhood brain tumours using magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The Knowledge Engineering Review 26: 353-363.
    • 9. Esposito M, De Pietro G (2011) An ontology-based fuzzy decision support system for multiple sclerosis. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 24: 1340-1354.
    • 10. Julia`-Sape´ M, Acosta D, Mier M, Aru´s C, Watson D, et al. (2006) A multicentre, web-accessible and quality control-checked database of in vivo MR spectra of brain tumour patients. Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine 19: 22-33.
    • 11. Lisboa PJG, Vellido A, Tagliaferri R, Napolitano F, Ceccarelli M, et al. (2010) Data Mining in Cancer Research. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine 5: 14-18.
    • 12. Julia`-Sape´ M, Lurgi M, Mier M, Estanyol F, Rafael X, et al. (2012) Strategies for annotation and curation of translational databases: the eTUMOUR project. Database 2012: bas035.
    • 13. Kounelakis MG, Dimou IN, Zervakis ME, Tsougos I, Tsolaki E, et al. (2011) Strengths and Weaknesses of 1.5T and 3T MRS Data in Brain Glioma Classification. IEEE transactions on information technology in biomedicine a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 15: 647-654.
    • 14. Wilson M, Davies N, Sun Y, Natarajan K, Arvanitis T, et al. (2009) A comparison between simulated and experimental basis sets for the analysis of short-echo in-vivo MRS data at 1.5T. Proceedings 17th Scientific Meeting, International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Vol. 526. p. 4337.
    • 15. Coons SW, Johnson PC, Scheithauer BW, Yates AJ, Pearl DK (1997) Improving diagnostic accuracy and interobserver concordance in the classification and grading of primary gliomas. Cancer 79: 1381-1393.
    • 16. Ellison DW, Kocak M, Figarella-Branger D, Giangaspero F, Godfraind C, et al. (2011) Histopathological grading of pediatric ependymoma: reproducibility and clinical relevance in European trial cohorts. Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine 10: 7.
    • 17. Kros JM (2011) Grading of gliomas: the road from eminence to evidence. Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology 70: 101-109.
    • 18. Huang Y, Lisboa PJG, El-Deredy W (2003) Tumour grading from magnetic resonance spectroscopy: a comparison of feature extraction with variable selection. Statistics in Medicine 22: 147-164.
    • 19. Garc´ıa-Go´mez JM, Luts J, Julia`-Sape´ M, Krooshof P, Tortajada S, et al. (2009) Multiproject-multicenter evaluation of automatic brain tumor classification by magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine 22: 5-18.
    • 20. Paatero P, Tapper U (1994) Positive matrix factorization: A non-negative factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data values. Environmetrics 5: 111-126.
    • 21. Lee DD, Seung HS (1999) Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature 401: 788-791.
    • 22. Sajda P, Du S, Brown TR, Stoyanova R, Shungu DC, et al. (2004) Nonnegative matrix factorization for rapid recovery of constituent spectra in magnetic resonance chemical shift imaging of the brain. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 23: 1453-1465.
    • 23. Croitor Sava A, Sima DM, Martinez-Bisbal MC, Celda B, Van Huffel S (2010) Non-negative blind source separation techniques for tumor tissue typing using HR-MAS signals. 32th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS). pp. 3658-3661.
    • 24. Ortega-Martorell S, Lisboa PJG, Vellido A, Julia`-Sape´ M, Aru´s C (2012) Nonnegative Matrix Factorisation methods for the spectral decomposition of MRS data from human brain tumours. BMC Bioinformatics 13.
    • 25. Zafeiriou S, Tefas A, Buciu I, Pitas I (2006) Exploiting discriminant information in nonnegative matrix factorization with application to frontal face verification. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 17: 683-695.
    • 26. Vilamala A, Lisboa PJG, Ortega-Martorell S, Vellido A (2013) Discriminant Convex Non-negative Matrix Factorization for the classification of human brain tumours. Pattern Recognition Letters 34: 1734-1747.
    • 27. Ding C, Li T, Jordan MI (2010) Convex and semi-nonnegative matrix factorizations. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 32: 45-55.
    • 28. Ruiz H, Ortega-Martorell S, Jarman IH, Vellido A, Romero E, et al. (2012) Towards interpretable classifiers with blind signal separation. In Proceedings of the IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence (WCCI 2012) International Joint Conference on Artificial Neural Networks (IJCNN 2012). Brisbane, Australia. pp. 3008-3016.
    • 29. Vellido A, Mart´ın-Guerrero JD, Lisboa PJG (2012) Making machine learning models interpretable. In Proceedings of the 20th European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, Computational Intelligence and Machine Learning (ESANN). Bruges, Belgium. pp. 163-172.
    • 30. Amari S (2001) Information geometry on hierarchy of probability distributions. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 47: 1701-1711.
    • 31. Ruiz H, Jarman IH, Mart´ın JD, Lisboa PJG (2011) The role of Fisher information in primary data space for neighbourhood mapping. In Proceedings of the 19th European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, Computational Intelligence and Machine Learning (ESANN). Bruges, Belgium. pp. 381-386.
    • 32. Sammon JW (1969) A nonlinear mapping for data structure analysis. IEEE Transactions on Computers 18: 401-409.
    • 33. Borg I, Groenen PJF (1997) Modern multidimensional scaling. New York: Springer Verlag.
    • 34. Heiser WJ (1995) Convergent computation by iterative majorization: Theory and applications in multidimensional data analysis. In: Krzanowski WJ, editor. Recent Advances in descriptive Multivariate Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 157-189.
    • 35. Kiers HAL (2002) Setting up alternating least squares and iterative majorization algorithms for solving various matrix optimization problems. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 41: 157-170.
    • 36. Tate AR, Underwood J, Acosta DM, Julia`-Sape´ M, Majo´s C, et al. (2006) Development of a decision support system for diagnosis and grading of brain tumours using in vivo magnetic resonance single voxel spectra. NMR in Biomedicine 19: 411-434.
    • 37. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK (2007) The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathologica 114: 97-109.
    • 38. Kleihues P, Cavenee WK (2000) Pathology and genetics of tumours of the nervous system. Lyon: IARC Press.
    • 39. Ohgaki H, Kleihues P (2013) The definition of primary and secondary glioblastoma. Clinical Cancer Research 19: 764-772.
    • 40. Tate AR, Griffiths JR, Mart´ınez-Pe´rez I, Moreno A, Barba I, et al. (1998) Towards a method for automated classification of 1H MRS spectra from brain tumours. NMR in Biomedicine 11: 177-191.
    • 41. Vellido A, Romero E, Gonza´lez-Navarro FF, Belanche-Mun˜ oz LA, Julia`-Sape´ M, et al. (2009) Outlier exploration and diagnostic classification of a multi-centre 1H-MRS brain tumour database. Neurocomputing 72: 3085-3097.
    • 42. Kaski S, Sinkkonen J (2000) Metrics that learn relevance. In Proceedings of the IEEE-INNS-ENNS International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN 2000). Como, Italy. pp. 547-552.
    • 43. Lee JA, Verleysen M (2007) Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction. Springer. New York: Springer.
    • 44. Zhang Z (2003) Learning metrics via discriminant kernels and multidimensional scaling: Toward expected Euclidean representation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML). pp. 872-879.
    • 45. Jain AK (2010) Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means. Pattern Recognition Letters 31: 651-666.
    • 46. Ortega-Martorell S, Vellido A, Lisboa PJG, Julia`-Sape´ M, Aru´s C (2011) Spectral decomposition methods for the analysis of MRS information from human brain tumors. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). San Jose´, California, USA. pp. 3279-3284.
    • 47. Jutten C, Herault J (1991) Blind separation of sources, Part 1: an adaptive algorithm based on neuromimetic architecture. Signal Processing 24: 1-10.
    • 48. Hyva¨rinen A, Oja E (2000) Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications. Neural Networks 13: 411-430.
    • 49. Cardoso JF, Souloumiac A (1993) Blind beamforming for non-Gaussian signals. In IEE Proceedings F Radar and Signal Processing 140: 362-370.
    • 50. Hyva¨rinen A (1999) Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 10: 626-634.
    • 51. Lukas L, Devos A, Suykens JAK, Vanhamme L, Howe FA, et al. (2004) Brain tumor classification based on long echo proton MRS signals. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 31: 73-89.
    • 52. Devos A, Lukas L, Suykens JAK, Vanhamme L, Tate AR, et al. (2004) Classification of brain tumours using short echo time 1H MR spectra. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 170: 164-175.
    • 53. Vellido A, Romero E, Julia`-Sape´ M, Majo´s C, Moreno-Torres A, et al. (2012) Robust discrimination of glioblastomas from metastatic brain tumors on the basis of single-voxel 1H MRS. NMR in Biomedicine 25: 819-828.
    • 54. Ishimaru H, Morikawa M, Iwanaga S, Kaminogo M, Ochi M, et al. (2001) Differentiation between high-grade glioma and metastatic brain tumor using single-voxel proton MR spectroscopy. European Radiology 11: 1784-1791.
    • 55. Fan G, Sun B, Wu Z, Guo Q , Guo Y (2004) In vivo single-voxel proton MR spectroscopy in the differentiation of high-grade gliomas and solitary metastases. Clinical Radiology 59: 77-85.
    • 56. Opstad KS, Murphy MM, Wilkins PR, Bell BA, Griffiths JR, et al. (2004) Differentiation of metastases from high-grade gliomas using short echo time 1H spectroscopy. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 20: 187-192.
    • 57. Herminghaus S, Pilatus U, Mo¨ller-Hartmann W, Raab P, Lanfermann H, et al. (2002) Increased choline levels coincide with enhanced proliferative activity of human neuroepithelial brain tumors. NMR in Biomedicine 15: 385-392.
    • 58. Candiota AP, Majo´s C, Julia`-Sape´ M, Caban˜ as M, Acebes JJ, et al. (2011) Noninvasive grading of astrocytic tumours from the relative contents of myo-inositol and glycine measured by in vivo MRS. JBR-BTR: organe de la Socie´te´ royale belge de radiologie (SRBR) = orgaan van de Koninklijke Belgische Vereniging voor Radiologie (KBVR) 94: 319-329.
    • 59. Barba I, Moreno A, Martinez-Pe´rez I, Tate AR, Caba n˜as ME, et al. (2001) Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of brain hemangiopericytomas: high myoinositol concentrations and discrimination from meningiomas. Journal of neurosurgery 94: 55-60.
    • 60. Mart´ınez-Bisbal MC, Mart´ı-Bonmat´ı L, Piquer J, Revert A, Ferrer P, et al. (2004) 1H and 13C HR-MAS spectroscopy of intact biopsy samples ex vivo and in vivo 1H MRS study of human high grade gliomas. NMR in biomedicine 17: 191-205.
    • 61. Ohgaki H, Dessen P, Jourde B, Horstmann S, Nishikawa T, et al. (2004) Genetic pathways to glioblastoma: a population-based study. Cancer research 64: 6892- 6899.
    • 62. DeAngelis LM, Mellinghoff IK (2011) Virchow 2011 or how to ID(H) human glioblastoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology 29: 4473-4474.
    • 63. Castells X, Acebes JJ, Majo´s C, Boluda S, Julia`-Sape´ M, et al. (2012) Development of robust discriminant equations for assessing subtypes of glioblastoma biopsies. British journal of cancer 106: 1816-1825.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.