Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Simons, Philippa; Cheung, Wai Ming (2016)
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: H100, H300, H700
This paper reports the development of a quantitative analysis system for selecting a greener and economically sustainable wind farm at the early design stage. A single wind turbine produces a limited amount of carbon emissions throughout its lifecycle. By taking a broader view, such as wind farms, collectively such an application would have a greater impact upon the environment and cost. Recent research on wind farms tends to focus on wind flow modelling to enable accurate prediction of power generation. Therefore, this paper presents a quantitative approach to predict a wind farm’s lifetime (i) carbon emissions and intensity; (ii) potential energy production; (iii) return on investment and (iv) payback time from an early design perspective. The overall contribution of this work is to develop a quantitative approach to enable the selection of ‘greener’ designs for reducing the environmental impacts of a wind farm with hub heights between 44 m and 135 m while still considering its economic feasibility assessment. This newly developed system could potentially be used by top-management and engineers of wind turbine manufacturers and wind energy service providers for cleaner energy provision.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Astolfi, D., Castellani, F., Garinei, A., Terzi, L. 2015. Data mining techniques for performance analysis of onshore wind farms. Appl. Energy, 148, 220-233.
    • Barthelmie, R.J., Hansen, K., Frandsen, S.T., Rathmann, O., Schepers, J.G., Schlez, W., Phillips, J., Rados, K., Zervos, A., Politis, E.S., Chaviaropoulos, P.K., 2009. Modelling and measuring flow and wind turbine wakes in large wind farms offshore. Wind. Energy. 12(5), 431-444.
    • Barthelmie, R.J., Jensen, L.E., 2010. Evaluation of wind farm efficiency and wind turbine wakes at the Nysted offshore wind farm. Wind. Energy. 13(6), 573-586.
    • Betz, A., Introduction to the theory of flow machines. 1966, Oxford: Pergamon Press.
    • Brower, M., 2012. Wind resource assessment: a practical guide to developing a wind project. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley.
    • BS EN 61400-1:2005+A1:2010., 2006. Wind turbines. Design requirements. British Standards Institute.
    • Builtjes, P.J.H., Smith, J., 1978. Calculation of wake effects in wind turbine parks. Wind. Eng. 2(3), 135-145.
    • Burke, D.J., O'Malley, M.J., 2011. Factors influencing wind energy curtailment. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 2(2), 185-193.
    • Burton, T., Jenkins, N., Sharpe, D., Bossanyi, E., 2011. Wind Energy Handbook. 2nd ed. West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    • Chen, B., Matthews, P.C., Tavner, P.J., 2015. Automated on-line fault prognosis for wind turbine pitch systems using supervisory control and data acquisition. Renewable Power Generation., IET, 9(5), 503-513.
    • Cheung, W.M., Marsh, R., Griffin, P. W., Newnes, L. B., Mileham, A. R., Lanham, J. D. 2015a. Towards cleaner production: a roadmap for predicting product endof-life costs at early design concept. J. Clean. Prod. , 87, 431-441.
    • Cheung, W.M., Marsh, R., Newnes, L. B., Mileham, A. R., Lanham, J. D. 2015b. Cost data modelling and searching to support low-volume, high-complexity, long-life defence system development. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B: J. Eng. Manuf., 229 (5), 835-846.
    • Cheung, W. M., Mileham, A. R., Newnes, L. B., Marsh, R., Lanham, J. D. 2011. Data-driven through-life costing to support product lifecycle management solutions in innovative product development. Int. J. Prod. Lifecycle. Manag. 5(2), 122-142.
    • Crespo, A., Hernández, J., Frandsen, S., 1999. Survey of modelling methods for wind turbine wakes and wind farms. Wind Energy, 2(1): 1-24.
    • Daim, T.U., Amer, M., Brenden, R., 2012. Technology roadmapping for wind energy: case of the Pacific Northwest. J. Clean. Prod. 20(1), 27-37.
    • DECC (Department of Energy and Climate Change). 2014. Energy Trends. . (assessed 2/11/2014).
    • Deng, Y., Z. Yu, Liu, S., 2011. A review on scale and siting of wind farms in China. Wind Energy, 14(3), 463-470.
    • Dovì, V.G., Friedler, F., Huisingh, D., Klemeš, J.J. 2009. Cleaner energy for sustainable future. J. Clean. Prod. , 17(10), 889-895.
    • Jeswiet, J., Kara, S., 2008. Carbon emissions and CES™ in manufacturing. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 57(1), 17-20.
    • Kabir, M.R., Rooke, B., Dassanayake, G.M. and Fleck, B.A., 2012. Comparative life cycle energy, emission, and economic analysis of 100 kW nameplate wind power generation. Renew. Energy, 37(1), 133-141
    • Kusiak, A., Zheng, H., Song, Z., 2009. Wind farm power prediction: a data‐mining approach. Wind. Energy., 12(3), 275-293.
    • Liu, T., Tavner, P.J., Feng, Y., Qiu, Y.N., 2013. Review of recent offshore wind power developments in china. Wind. Energy. 16(5), 786-803.
    • Lund, P.D., 2010. Fast market penetration of energy technologies in retrospect with application to clean energy futures. Appl. Energy, 87(11), 3575-3583.
    • Marimuthu, C., Kirubakaran, V., 2013. Carbon payback period for solar and wind energy project installed in India: A critical review. Renew. Sustain. Energy. Rev. 23, 80-90.
    • Maxwell, D., Van der Vorst, R., 2003. Developing sustainable products and services, J. Clean. Prod. 11(8), 883-895
    • Matthews, P.C., 2011. Challenges to bayesian decision support using morphological matrices for design: empirical evidence. Res. Eng. Des. 22(1), 29-42.
    • Milborrow, D.J., Surman, P.L., 1987. CEGB wind energy strategy and future research. The 9th BWEA Wind Energy Conference, MEP Ltd.
    • Réthoré, P.E., Fuglsang, P., Larsen, G.C., Buhl, T., Larsen, T.J., Madsen, H.A., 2014. TOPFARM: Multi‐fidelity optimization of wind farms. Wind. Energy., 17(12), 1797-1816.
    • Taillard, M., 2012, Corporate Finance For Dummies, Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, 360 pages, ISBN: 978-1-118-41279-4.
    • Tait, M.W., Cheung, W.M., 2016. A comparative cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of three concrete mix designs. Int. J. Life. Cycle. Assess. 21(6), 847-860.
    • Tremeac, B., Meunier, F., 2009. Life cycle analysis of 4.5MW and 250W wind turbines. Renew. Sustain. Energy. Rev. 13(8), 2104-2110.
    • Uddin, M.S., Kumar, S., 2014. Energy, emissions and environmental impact analysis of wind turbine using life cycle assessment technique. J. Clean. Prod., 69, 153- 164.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article