LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Stokoe, E; Edwards, D; Edwards, H (2015)
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Languages: English
Types: Part of book or chapter of book
Subjects:
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Antaki, C., Houtkoop-Steenstra, H., & Rapley, M. (2000). “Brilliant. Next question…”: High-grade assessment sequences in the completion of interactional units. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33 (3), 235-262.
    • Atkinson, J.M., & Drew, P. (1979). Order in court: The organisation of verbal interaction in judicial settings. London: Macmillan
    • Beach, W.A. (1985). Temporal density in courtroom interaction: Constraints of the recovery of past events in legal discourse. Communication Monographs, 52,1-18.
    • Benneworth, K. (2006). Repertoires of paedophilia: Conflicting descriptions of adult-child sexual relationships in the investigative interview. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 13(2), 190-211.
    • Bittner, E. (1967 ). The police on skid row: A study of peace keeping. American Sociological Review, 32, 699-715.
    • Bogen, D., & Lynch, M. (1989). Taking account of the hostile native: Plausible deniability and the production of conventional history in the Iran-Contra Hearings. Social Problems, 36, 197-224.
    • Burns, S. (2001). “Think your blackest thoughts and darken them”: Judicial mediation of large money damage disputes.” Human Studies, 24(3), 227-49.
    • Butler, C.W., Danby, S., & Emmison, M. (2011). Address terms in turn beginnings: Managing disalignment and disaffiliation in telephone counseling. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 44(4), 338-358.
    • Cicourel, A.V., (1968). The social organization of juvenile justice. New York: Wiley.
    • CJPO (1994). Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, Part III, Sections 34-37. London: HMSO.
    • Dando, C., Wilcock, R., & Milne, R. (2008). The cognitive interview: Inexperienced police officers' perceptions of their witness/victim interviewing practices. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 13, 59-70.
    • De Fruyt, F., Bockstaele, M., Taris, R., & Van Hiel, A. (2006). Police interview competencies: Assessment and associated traits. European Journal of Personality, 20 (7), 567-584.
    • Edwards, D. (1994). Script formulations: A study of event descriptions in conversation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13 (3), 211-247.
    • Edwards, D. (2000). Extreme case formulations: Softeners, investment, and doing nonliteral. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33 (4), 347-373.
    • Edwards, D. (2006). Facts, norms and dispositions: Practical uses of the modal would in police interrogations. Discourse Studies, 8 (4), 475-501.
    • Edwards, D. (2008). Intentionality and mens rea in police interrogations: The production of actions as crimes. Intercultural Pragmatics, 5 (2), 177-199.
    • Edwards, D., & Stokoe, E. (2011). “You don't have to answer”: Lawyers' contributions in police interrogations of suspects. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 44 (1), 21-43.
    • Galatolo, R. (2007). Active voicing in court. In E. Holt & R. Clift (Eds.), Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction (pp. 195-220). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    • Haworth, K. (2006). The dynamics of power and resistance in police interview discourse. Discourse & Society, 17 (6), 739-759.
    • Heritage, J.C. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299-346). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Heydon, G. (2005). The language of police interviewing: A critical analysis. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Holmberg, U., & Christianson, S.A. (2002). Murderers' and sexual offenders' experiences of police interviews and their inclination to admit or deny crimes. Behavioural Sciences and the Law, 20 (1-2), 31-45.
    • Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13-31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Johnson, A.J. (2008). “From where we're sat…”: Negotiating narrative transformation through interaction in police interviews with suspects. Text & Talk, 28 (3), 327-349.
    • Kassim, S.M., Leo, R.A., Meissner, C.A., Richman, K.D., Colwell, L.H., Leach, A., & La Fon, D. (2007). Police interviewing and interrogation: A self-report survey of police practices and beliefs. Law and Human Behaviour, 31 (4), 381-400.
    • Kidwell, M. (2006). “Calm down!”: The role of gaze in the interactional management of hysteria by the police. Discourse Studies, 8 (6), 771-796.
    • Komter, M. (2003). The interactional dynamics of eliciting a confession in a Dutch police interrogation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36 (4), 433-470.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article