Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Healey, Mark P.; Hodgkinson, Gerard P. (2014)
Publisher: Sage Publications Ltd.
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: reductionism, philosophy of science, Strategy and Management, neuroeconomics, Management of Technology and Innovation, behavioural microfoundations, Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous), /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/3300, Social Sciences(all), quality of inferences, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/1200/1201, leadership, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/1400/1405, HD, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/1400/1408, QP

Classified by OpenAIRE into

ACM Ref: ComputingMilieux_GENERAL
Stimulated by the growing use of brain imaging and related neurophysiological techniques in psychology and economics, scholars have begun to debate the implications of neuroscience for management and organization studies (MOS). Currently, this debate is polarizing scholarly opinion. At one extreme, advocates are calling for a new neuroscience of organizations, which they claim will revolutionize understanding of a wide range of key processes, with significant implications for management practice. At the other extreme, detractors are decrying the relevance of neuroscience for MOS, primarily on philosophical and ethical grounds. The present article progresses this debate by outlining an intermediate, critical realist position, in which the insights of social neuroscience are one of a number of convergent building blocks that together point toward the need for a more embodied and socially situated view of cognition in management and organizations. © The Author(s) 2014.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Akinci C and Sadler-Smith E. (2012) Intuition in Management Research: A Historical Review. International Journal of Management Reviews 14: 104-122.
    • Andrade EB and Ariely D. (2009) The enduring impact of transient emotions on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 109: 1-8.
    • Babiak P and Hare RD. (2006) Snakes in suits: When psychopaths go to work, New York: Harper.
    • Balthazard PA, Waldman DA, Thatcher RW, et al. (2012) Differentiating transformational and non-transformational leaders on the basis of neurological imaging. Leadership Quarterly 23: 244-258.
    • Bandura A. (1991) Social Cognitive Theory of Self-Regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50: 248-287.
    • Barney J and Felin T. (2013) WHAT ARE MICROFOUNDATIONS? Academy of Management Perspectives 27: 138-155.
    • Barsade SG and Gibson DE. (2007) Why does affect matter in organizations? Academy of Management Perspectives 21: 36-59.
    • Barsalou LW. (1999) Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 577- 660.
    • Barsalou LW. (2008) Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology. 617-645.
    • Bechara A, Damasio H and Damasio AR. (2000) Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex 10: 295-307.
    • Becker WJ and Cropanzano R. (2010) Organizational neuroscience: The promise and prospects of an emerging discipline. Journal of Organizational Behavior 31: 1055- 1059.
    • Becker WJ, Cropanzano R and Sanfey AG. (2011) Organizational Neuroscience: Taking Organizational Theory Inside the Neural Black Box. Journal of Management 37: 933- 961.
    • Beilock SL and Goldin-Meadow S. (2010) Gesture Changes Thought by Grounding It in Action. Psychological Science 21: 1605-1610.
    • Bhaskar R. (1975) A realist theory of science, Leeds: Leeds Books.
    • Bhaskar R. (1978) On the posssibility of social scientific knowledge and the limits of naturalism. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 8: 1-28.
    • Bhaskar R. (1989) The possibility of naturalism, Hemel Hemstead: Harvester.
    • Bhaskar R. (1998) The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences (3rd Edition), London: Routledge.
    • Bhaskar R. (2008) A realist theory of science (Revised Edition), London: Routledge.
    • Bhaskar R. (2011) Reclaiming reality, London: Routledge.
    • Bickhard M and Campbell DT. (2000) Emergence. In: Andersen PB, Emmeche C, Finnemann NO, et al. (eds) Downward Causation: Minds, Bodies and Matter. Århus: Aarhus University Press, 322-348.
    • Black CM. (2008) Working for a healthier tomorrow, London: The Stationary Office.
    • Blau PM. (1974) On the Nature of Organizations, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    • Bunge M. (1977) EMERGENCE AND MIND. Neuroscience 2: 501-509.
    • Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., & Decety, J. (2012). A history of social neuroscience. In A. W. Kruglanski & W. Stroebe (Eds.), Handbook of the history of social psychology (pp. 123-136). New York: Psychology Press.
    • Campbell DT. (1990) Levels of organization, downward causation, and the selection-theory approach to evolutionary epistemology. In: Greenberg G and Tobach E (eds) Theories of the evolution of knowing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1-17.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article