Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Jan, Steven (2015)
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
Subjects: M1, QL, T1
Simulating musical creativity using computers needs more than the ability to devise elegant computational implementations of sophisticated algorithms. It requires, firstly, an understanding of what phenomena might be regarded as music; and, secondly, an understanding of the nature of such phenomena — including their evolutionary history, their recursive-hierarchic structure, and the mechanisms by which they are transmitted within cultural groups. To understand these issues it is fruitful to compare human music, and indeed human language, with analogous phenomena in other areas of the animal kingdom. Whale song, specifically that of the humpback (Megaptera novaeangeliae), possesses many structural and functional similarities to human music (as do certain types of birdsong). Using a memetic perspective, this paper compares the “musilanguage” of humpbacks with the music of humans, and aims to identify a number of shared characteristics. A consequence of nature and nurture, these commonalities appear to arise partly from certain constraints of perception and cognition (and thus they determine an aspect of the environment within which the “musemes” (musical memes) constituting whale vocalizations and human music is replicated), and partly from the social-emotive-embodied and sexual-selective nature of musemic transmission. The paper argues that Universal-Darwinian forces give rise to uniformities of structure in phenomena we might regard as “music”, irrespective of the animal group — certain primates, cetaceans or birds - within which it occurs. It considers the extent to which whale song might be regarded as creative, by invoking certain criteria used to assess this attribute in human music. On the basis of these various comparisons, the paper concludes by attempting to draw conclusions applicable to those engaged in designing evolutionary music simulation/generation algorithms.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Blackmore, S. J. (2005). Consciousness: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Boden, M. A. (2004). The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms (2nd edn ed.). London and New York: Routledge.
    • Brown, S. (2000). The \Musilanguage" Model of Musical Evolution. In N. L. Wallin, B. Merker, & S. Brown (Eds.), The origins of music (pp. 271{300). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    • Carroll, S. B. (2003). Genetics and the Making of Homo Sapiens. Nature, 422 (6934), 849{857.
    • Carruthers, P. (2002, January). The Cognitive Functions of Language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25 , 657{726. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X02000122 doi: 10.1017/ S0140525X02000122
    • Cope, D. (2001). Virtual Music: Computer Synthesis of Musical Style. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    • Dawkins, R. (1983). Universal Darwinism. In D. S. Bendall (Ed.), Evolution from molecules to men (pp. 403{425). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Dawkins, R. (2006). The Blind Watchmaker. London: Penguin.
    • Dennett, D. C. (1989). The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    • Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. London: Penguin.
    • Deutsch, D. (1999). Grouping Mechanisms in Music. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psychology of music (2nd ed., pp. 299{348). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    • Dissanayake, E. (2008). If Music is the Food of Love, What About Survival and Reproductive Success? Musicae Scientiae, 12 (Special Issue: Narrative in Music and Interaction), 169{195. doi: 10.1177/ 1029864908012001081
    • Earp, S. E., & Maney, D. L. (2012). Birdsong: Is it Music to their Ears? Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience, 4 . doi: 10.3389/fnevo.2012 .00014
    • Eigenfeldt, A., Bown, O., Pasquier, P., & Martin, A. (2013). Towards a Taxonomy of Musical Metacreation: Re ections on The First Musical Metacreation Weekend. In Proceedings of the second international workshop on musical metacreation (mume-2013), in conjunction with the ninth annual aaai conference on arti cial intelligence and interactive digital entertainment (aiide-13). AAAI Press. Retrieved from http://philippepasquier.com/
    • Fitch, W. T. (2006). The Biology and Evolution of Music: A Comparative Perspective. Cognition, 100 (1), 173{215. Retrieved from http://www .ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16412411 doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005 .11.009
    • Fitch, W. T. (2009). Animal Behaviour: Birdsong Normalized by Culture. Nature, 459 , 519{520. doi: 10.1038/459519a
    • Gimenes, M., & Miranda, E. R. (2011). An Ontomemetic Approach to Musical Intelligence. In E. R. Miranda (Ed.), A-life for music: Music and computer models of living systems (pp. 261{286). Middleton, WI: A-R Editions.
    • Harari, Y. N. (2014). Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. London: Harvill Secker.
    • Jan, S. B. (2007). The Memetics of Music: A Neo-Darwinian View of Musical Structure and Culture. Aldershot: Ashgate.
    • Jan, S. B. (2010). Memesatz contra Ursatz: Memetic Perspectives on the Aetiology and Evolution of Musical Structure. Musicae Scientiae, 14 (1), 3{50.
    • Jan, S. B. (2015a). From Holism to Compositionality: Memes and the Evolution of Segmentation, Syntax and Signi cation in Music and Language. Language and Cognition, 7 (1), 1{38. doi: doi:10.1017/langcog.2015.1
    • Jan, S. B. (2015b). Memetic Perspectives on the Evolution of Tonal Systems. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 40 (2), 143{165.
    • Kirby, S. (2013). Transitions: The Evolution of Linguistic Replicators. In P. M. Binder & K. Smith (Eds.), The language phenomenon: Human communication from milliseconds to millennia (pp. 121{138). Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Kirby, S., & Hurford, J. (2002). The Emergence of Linguistic Structure: An Overview of the Iterated Learning Model. In A. Cangelosi & D. Parisi (Eds.), Simulating the evolution of language (pp. 121{148). London: Springer.
    • Kirke, A. J. (2011). Application of Multi-Agent Whale Modelling to an Interactive Saxophone and Whales Duet. Proceedings of International Computer Music Conference, 350{353.
    • Lerdahl, F. (1992, January). Cognitive Constraints on Compositional Systems. Contemporary Music Review , 6 (2), 97{ 121. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10 .1080/07494469200640161 doi: 10.1080/07494469200640161
    • MacCallum, R. M., Mauch, M., Burt, A., & Leroi, A. M. (2012). Evolution of music by public choice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109 (30), 12081{12086. Retrieved from http://www.pnas.org/ content/early/2012/06/12/1203182109.abstract doi: 10.1073/ pnas.1203182109
    • Miller, G. (2000). Evolution of Human Music Through Sexual Selection. In N. L. Wallin, B. Merker, & S. Brown (Eds.), The origins of music (pp. 329{360). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi: 10.1177/004057368303900411
    • Miranda, E. R. (2004). At the Crossroads of Evolutionary Computation in Music: Self-Programming Synthesizers, Swarm Orchestras and the Origins of Melody. Evolutionary Computation, 12 (2), 137{158. doi: 10.1162/106365604773955120
    • Miranda, E. R. (2014). Harnessing the Intelligence of Physarum Polycephalum for Unconventional Computing-Aided Musical Composition. International Journal of Unconventional Computing, 10 (3), 251{268.
    • Miranda, E. R., Kirby, S., & Todd, P. M. (2003). On Computational Models of the Evolution of Music: From the Origins of Musical Taste to the Emergence of Grammars. Contemporary Music Review , 22 (2), 91{110.
    • Mithen, S. (2006). The Singing Neanderthals: The Origins of Music, Language, Mind and Body. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
    • Morley, I. (2012). Hominin Physiological Evolution and the Emergence of Musical Capacities. In N. Bannan (Ed.), Music, language, and human evolution (pp. 109{141). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Narmour, E. (1990). The Analysis and Cognition of Basic Melodic Structures: The Implication-Realization Model. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    • O zcan, E., & Ercal, T. (2008). A Genetic Algorithm for Generating Improvised Music. In N. Monmarche, E.-G. Talbi, P. Collet, M. Schoenauer, & E. Lutton (Eds.), Arti cial evolution (Vol. 4926, pp. 266{277). Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10 .1007/978-3-540-79305-2\ 23 doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-79305-2n 23
    • Parsons, E. C. M., Wright, A. J., & Gore, M. A. (2008). The Nature of Humpback Whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) Song. Journal of Marine Animals and Their Ecology, 1 , 22{31. Retrieved from http://www.oers .ca/journal/Volume1/issue1vol1-2008-JMATE.pdf\#page=23
    • Payne, K. (2000). The Progressively Changing Songs of Humpback Whales: A Window on the Creative Process in a Wild Animal. In N. L. Wallin, B. Merker, & S. Brown (Eds.), The origins of music (pp. 135{150). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    • Popper, K. (1959). The Logic of Scienti c Discovery. London: Hutchinson.
    • Ridley, M. (2004). Evolution (3rd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Shapiro, L. A. (2011). Embodied Cognition. London: Routledge.
    • Snyder, B. (2000). Music and Memory: An Introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article