Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:

OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]openaire.eu

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Berry, David M (2014)
Publisher: Educause
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Z665, HM0481, T1
Today we live in computational abundance whereby our everyday lives and the environment that surrounds us are suffused with digital technologies. This is a world of anticipatory technology and contextual computing that uses smart diffused computational processing to create a fine web of computational resources that are embedded into the material world. Thus, the historical distinction between the digital and the non-digital becomes increasingly blurred, to the extent that to talk about the digital presupposes an experiential disjuncture that makes less and less sense. Indeed, just as the ideas of “online” or “being online” have become anachronistic as a result of our always-on smartphones and tablets and widespread wireless networking technologies, so too the term “digital” perhaps assumes a world of the past.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Kim Cascone, “The Aesthetics of Failure: 'PostDigital' Tendencies in Contemporary Computer Music,” Computer Music Journal, vol. 24, no. 4 (Winter 2000), p. 12.
    • 2. Claire Bishop, “Digital Divide,” Artforum, September 2012.
    • 3. Willard McCarty, Humanities Computing (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005); Willard McCarty, “Getting There from Here: Remembering the Future of Digital Humanities,” Busa Award Lecture, Digital Humanities 2013 conference, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, July 18, 2013.
    • 4. David M. Berry, ed., Understanding Digital Humanities (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012), p. 2.
    • 5. Bernard Stiegler, “Teleologics of the Snail: The Errant Self Wired to a WiMax Network,” Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 26, nos. 2-3 (March/May 2009), p. 40.
    • 6. Bernard Stiegler, What Makes Life Worth Living: On Pharmacology (Cambridge, England: Polity Press, 2013).
    • 7. Imre Lakatos, Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, ed. John Worrall and Gregory Currie (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1978).
    • 8. Florian Cramer, afterword to Alessandro Ludovico, Post-Digital Print: The Mutation of Publishing Since 1894 (Eindhoven, The Netherlands: Onomatopee 77, Cabinet Project, 2012), p. 162.
    • 9. Alan Liu, “Where Is Cultural Criticism in the Digital Humanities?” chapter in Matthew Gold, ed., Debates in the Digital Humanities (Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 2012) and online: http://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/debates/text/20.
    • © 2014 David M. Berry. The text of this article is licensed under the Creative Commons AttributionShareAlike 4.0 International License (http://creative commons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0).
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok