Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Purser, Harry; Thomas, Michael S.C.; Snoxall, Sarah; Mareschal, Denis; Karmiloff-Smith, Annette (2011)
Publisher: Wiley Blackwell
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: psyc
Background: Williams syndrome (WS) is associated with relatively strong language abilities despite mild to moderate intellectual disability, particularly when language is indexed by vocabulary. Aims: The aim of the study was twofold: (1) to investigate whether reported lexical anomalies in WS can be explained with reference to anomalous semantic development; and (2) to assess whether receptive vocabulary skills in WS, a relative strength, are underpinned by commensurate semantic knowledge. Methods & Procedures: The development of lexical-semantic knowledge was investigated in 45 typically developing individuals (chronological age range = 5-10 years, mental age range = 5-13 years) and 15 individuals with WS (chronological age range = 12-50 years, mental age range = 4-17 years) by means of (1) a categorization task and (2) a definitions task, which was expected to make additional metacognitive demands. Outcomes & Results: At younger ages, the performance level of typically developing individuals and individuals with WS did not differ on the definitions task. However, the WS group's ability to define words fell away from the level predicted by the typically developing group at older ages, as more sophisticated definitions were expected. The results of the categorization task indicated that individuals with WS had less lexical-semantic knowledge than expected given their level of receptive vocabulary, although from this lower level the knowledge then developed at a similar rate to that found in typical development. Conclusions & Implications: It is concluded, first, that conventional vocabulary measures may overestimate lexical-semantic knowledge in WS; and, second, concerns about the metacognitive demands of the definitions task when used with atypical populations may be well founded.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Anderson, M. (1998). Mental retardation general intelligence and modularity. Learning and individual differences, 10, 159-178.
    • Ansari, D., Donlan, C., Thomas, M. S. C., Ewing, S. A., Peen, T., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2003). What makes counting count? Verbal and visuo-spatial contributions to typical and atypical number development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85, 50- 62.
    • Bellugi, U., Bihrle, A., Jernigan, T., Trauner, D., & Doherty, S. (1990). Neuropsychological, neurological, and neuroanatomical profile of Williams syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics Supplement, 6, 115-125.
    • Bellugi, U., Bihrle, A., Neville, H., Jernigan, T., & Doherty, S. (1992). Language, cognition, and brain organization in a neurodevelopmental disorder. In M. Gunnar & C. Nelson (Eds.), Developmental Behavioral Neuroscience (pp. 201-232). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Bellugi, U., Lichtenberger, L., Jones, W., Lai, Z., & St. George, M. (2000). The neurocognitive profile of Williams syndrome: A complex pattern of strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12:S, 7-29.
    • Bellugi, U., Marks, S., Bihrle, A., & Sabo, H. (1988). Dissociation between language and cognitive function in Williams Syndrome. In D. Bishop & K. Mogford (Eds.), Language development in exceptional circumstances. Edinburgh, U.K.: Churchill Livingstone.
    • Bellugi, U., Wang, P. P., & Jernigan, T. L. (1994). Williams syndrome: An unusual neuropsychological profile. In S. Broman & J. Grafman (Eds.), Atypical cognitive deficits in developmental disorders: Implications for brain function. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    • Benelli, B., Arcuri, L., & Marchesini, G. (1988) Cognitive and linguistic factors in the development of word definitions. Journal of Child Language, 15, 619-635.
    • Brock, J. (2007). Language abilities in Williams syndrome: a critical review. Development and Psychopathology, 19, 97-127.
    • Brock, J., Jarrold, C., Farran, E. K., Laws, G., & Riby, D. (2007). Do children with Williams syndrome have really good vocabulary knowledge? Methods for comparing cognitive and linguistic abilities in developmental disorders. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 21, 673-688.
    • Clahsen, H., Ring, M. & Temple, C. (2004). Lexical and morphological skills in Englishspeaking children with Williams Syndrome. In S. Bartke & J. Siegmueller (Eds.), Williams Syndrome across Languages (pp.221-244). Benjamins: Amsterdam.
    • Donnai, D., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2000). Williams syndrome: From genotype through to the cognitive phenotype. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 97, 164-171.
    • Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., Whetton, C., & Burley, J. (1997). British Picture Vocabulary Scale II. Windsor, U.K.: NFER-Nelson.
    • Ewart, A. K., Morris, C. A., Atkinson, D., Jin, W., Sternes. K., Spallone. P., Stock, A. D., Leppert, M., & Keating, M. T. (1993). Hemizygosity at the elastin locus in an developmental disorder, Williams Syndrome. Nature Genetics, 5, 11-16.
    • Farran, E. K., & Jarrold, C. (2003). Visuo-spatial cognition in Williams syndrome: Reviewing and accounting for strengths and weaknesses in performance. Developmental Neuropsychology, 23, 173-200.
    • Howlin, P., Davies, M., & Udwin, O. (1998). Cognitive functioning in adults with Williams syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 183-189.
    • Jarrold, C., & Brock, J. (2004). To match or not to match? Methodological issues in autismrelated research. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 81-86.
    • Jarrold, C., Hartley, S. J., Phillips, C., & Baddeley, A. D. (2000) Word fluency in Williams syndrome: Evidence for unusual semantic organization. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 5, 293-318.
    • Johnson, S. C. & Carey, S. (1998). Knowledge enrichment and conceptual change in folkbiology: evidence from Williams syndrome. Cognitive Psychology, 37, 156-200.
    • Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1998) Development itself is the key to understanding developmental disorders. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 389-398.
    • Laing, E., Grant, J., Thomas, M., Parmigiani, C., Ewing, S., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2005). Love is...an abstract word: The influence of lexical semantics on verbal short-term memory in Williams syndrome. Cortex, 41, 169-179.
    • Mervis, C., & Bertrand, J. (1997). Developmental relations between cognition and language: Evidence from Williams syndrome. In L. B. Adamson & M. A. Romski (Eds.), Research on communication and language disorders: Contribution to theories of language development (pp.75-106). New York: Brookes.
    • Morris, C. A., Dempsey, S. A., Leonard, C. O., Dilts, C., & Blackburn, B. L. (1988). Natural history of Williams syndrome: Physical characteristics. Journal of Paediatric Medicine, 113, 318-326
    • Rossen, M., Klima, E. S., Bellugi, U., Bihrle, A., & Jones, W. (1996). Interaction between language and cognition: Evidence from Williams syndrome. In J. H. Beitchman, N. J. Cohen, M. M. Konstantareas & R. Tannock, Language learning and behavior (pp. 367-92). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    • Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1987) Precis of Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 10, 697-754
    • Stevens, T. & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1997) Word learning in a special population: Do individuals with Williams syndrome obey lexical constraints? Journal of Child Language, 24, 737-765.
    • Stojanovik, V., & van Ewijk, L. (2008). Do children with Williams syndrome have unusual vocabularies? Journal of Neurolinguistics, 21, 18-34.
    • Temple, C. M., Almazan, M. & Sherwood, S. (2002) Lexical skills in Williams' syndrome: A cognitive neuropsychological analysis. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 15, 463-495.
    • Thal, D., Bates, E., & Bellugi, U. (1989). Language and cognition in two children with Williams Syndrome. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 3, 489-500.
    • Thomas, M. S. C. (2008). L'acquisition du langage dans les pathologies du diveloppement [Language development in developmental disorders]. In M. Kail, M. Fayol, & M. Hickmann, L'apprentissage des langues, (pp. 451-475). Paris: CNRS Editions.
    • Thomas, M. S. C., Annaz, D., Ansari, D., Scerif, G., Jarrold, C., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2009). Using developmental trajectories to understand developmental disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 336-358.
    • Thomas, M. S. C., Dockrell, J. E., Messer, D., Parmigiani, C., Ansari, D., & KarmiloffSmith, A. (2006). Speeded naming, frequency and the development of the lexicon in Williams syndrome. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 721-759.
    • Thomas, M. S. C., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2005). Can developmental disorders reveal the component parts of the human language faculty? Language Learning and Development, 1, 65-92.
    • Tyler, L. K., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Voice, K., Stevens, T., Grant, J., Udwin, O., Davies, M., Howlin, P. (1997) Do individuals with Williams syndrome have bizarre semantics? Evidence for lexical organization using an on-line task. Cortex, 33, 515-527.
    • Udwin, O. & Dennis, J. (1995). Psychological and behavioural phenotypes in genetically determined syndromes: A review of research findings. In G. O'Brien and W. Yule (Eds.) Behavioural Phenotypes. Clinics in Developmental Medicine No. 138. London: MacKeith Press.
    • Udwin, O., & Yule, W. (1990). Expressive language of children with Williams syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics Supplement, 6, 108-114.
    • Volterra, V., Caselli, M.C., Capirci, O., Tonucci, F., Vicari, S. (2003). Early linguistic abilities in Italian children with Williams Syndrome. Developmental Neuropsychology, 23, 33-58.
    • Wilson, D. & Sperber, D. (2004). Relevance Theory. In L. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 607-632). Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Wilson, M. D. (1988). The MRC Psycholinguistic Database: Machine Readable Dictionary, Version 2. Behavioural Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 20, 6-11.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article