LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Demir, Eren; Chaussalet, Thierry J.; Xie, Haifeng; Millard, Peter H.
Publisher: IEEE
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: UOW3
A frequently chosen time window in defining readmission is 28 days after discharge. Yet in the literature, shorter and longer periods such as 14 days or 90-180 days have also been suggested. In this paper, we develop a modeling approach that systematically tackles the issue surrounding the appropriate choice of a time window as a definition of readmission. The approach is based on the intuitive idea that patients who are discharged from hospital can be broadly divided in to two groups-a group that is at high risk of readmission and a group that is at low risk. Using the national data (England), we demonstrate the usefulness of the approach in the case of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), stroke, and congestive heart failure (CHF) patients, which are known to be the leading causes of early readmission. Our findings suggest that there are marked differences in the optimal width of the time window for COPD, stroke, and CHF patients. Furthermore, time windows and the probabilities of being in the high-risk group for COPD, stroke, and CHF patients for each of the 29 acute and specialist trusts in the London area indicate wide variability between hospitals. The novelty of this modeling approach lies in its ability to define an appropriate time window based on evidence objectively derived from operational data. Therefore, it can separately provide a unique approach in examining variability between hospitals, and potentially contribute to a better definition of readmission as a performance indicator.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] S. Capewell, “Stemming the tide of readmissions: Patient, practice or practitioner?” Br. Med. J., vol. 312, pp. 991-992, 1996.
    • [2] J. Brown and C. S. Gray, “The continuing rise in emergency admissions,” Rev. Clin. Gerontol., vol. 8, pp. 173-181, 1998.
    • [3] Healthcare Commission. (2005). Performance Ratings [Online]. Available: http://ratings2005.healthcarecommission.org.uk (accessed Feb. 2, 2007).
    • [4] M. C. Benbassat, H. D. Kuykendall, L. M. Johnson, P. N. Wray, and L. Wu, “The association between the quality of inpatient care and early readmission,” Ann. Internal Med., vol. 122, pp. 415-421, 1995.
    • [5] D. W. Sibbritt, “Validation of a 28 day interval between discharge and readmission for emergency readmission rates,” J. Qual. Clin. Pract., vol. 15, pp. 211-220, 1995.
    • [6] M. Chambers and A. Clarke, “Measuring readmission rates,” Br. Med. J., vol. 301, pp. 1134-1136, 1990.
    • [7] J. Corrigan and J. Martin, “Identification of factors associated with hospital readmission and development of a predictive model,” Health Serv. Res., vol. 27, pp. 81-101, 1992.
    • [8] E. Williams and F. Fitton, “Factors affecting early unplanned readmission of elderly patients to hospital,” Br. Med. J., vol. 297, pp. 784-787, 1988.
    • [9] E. Demir, T. J. Chaussalet, H. Xie, and P. H. Millard, “A Method for determining an emergency readmission time window for better patient management,” in Proc. 19th IEEE Symp. CBMS, 2006, pp. 789-793.
    • [10] C. Luthi, B. Burnard, M. McClellan, R. Pitts, and D. Flanders, “Is readmission to hospital an indicator of poor process of care for patients with heart failure?,” Br. Med. J., vol. 13, pp. 46-51, 2003.
    • [11] M. Roland, M. Dusheiko, H. Gravelle, and S. Parker, “Follow up of people aged 65 and over with a history of emergency admissions: Analysis of routine admission data,” Br. Med. J., vol. 330, pp. 289-292, 2005.
    • [12] D. R. Cox, “A use of complex probabilities in the theory of stochastic processes,” in Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 1955, vol. 51, pp. 313-319.
    • [13] R Development Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria, R Foundation for Stat. Comput., 2005.
    • [14] H. Akaike, “A new look at the statistical model identification,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 716-723, Dec. 1974.
    • [15] G. Schwarz, “Estimating the dimension of a model,” Ann. Statist., vol. 6, pp. 461-464, 1978.
    • [16] M. J. Faddy and S. I. McClean, “Analysing data on lengths of stay of hospital patients using phase-type distributions,” Appl. Stochastic Models Bus. Ind., vol. 15, pp. 311-317, 1999.
    • [17] D. Hand, H. Mannila, and P. Smyth, Principles of Data Mining. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001.
    • [18] Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, “The English indices of deprivation 2004,” Office of the Deputy Prime Minister London, U.K., Rep., 2004.
    • [19] G. Lyratzopoulos, D. Havely, I. Gemmell, and A. G. Cook, “Factors influencing emergency medical readmission risk in a UK district general hospital: A prospective study,” Biomed. Central Emer. Med., vol. 5, pp. 1- 9, 2005.
    • [20] Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection, “Clearing the air-A national study of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,” Comm. Healthcare Audit and Inspect., London, U.K., Rep., 2006. Peter H. Millard received the M.B. B.S. (Hons. Surg.) degree from the University College Hospital, University of London, London, U.K., in 1960, and the M.D. and Ph.D. degrees from St. George's Hospital Medical School, University of London, in 1988 and 1993, respectively. He is currently a Visiting Professor in the University of Westminster, London, U.K. In 1968, he was the first consultant in geriatric medicine appointed to St. George's Hospital, London. During 1993-2002, he was a Visiting Professor in the Department of Mathematics, University of Ulster. He is the coauthor of many articles published. In 1999, he was an expert Advisor to the Council of Europe. He is an Editor of the Nosokinetics News. Prof. Millard is the President of the British Geriatrics Society and the President of the Geriatrics and Gerontology Section of the Royal Society of Medicine.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article