OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Mawson, E.; Best, D.; Beckwith, M.; Dingle, G. A.; Lubman, D. I. (2015)
Publisher: BioMed Central
Journal: Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Social network, Emerging adult, Substance use, Treatment, Health Policy, Recovery, Social identity, Quality of life, Research, Psychiatry and Mental health
Background\ud It has been argued that recovery from substance dependence relies on a change in identity, with past research focused on ‘personal identity’. This study assessed support for a social identity model of recovery in emerging adults through examining associations between social identity, social networks, recovery capital, and quality of life.\ud \ud Methods\ud Twenty participants aged 18–21 in residential treatment for substance misuse were recruited from four specialist youth drug treatment services - three detoxification facilities and one psychosocial rehabilitation facility in Victoria, Australia. Participants completed a detailed social network interview exploring the substance use of groups in their social networks and measures of quality of life, recovery capital, and social identity.\ud \ud Results\ud Lower group substance use was associated with higher recovery capital, stronger identification with non-using groups, and greater importance of non-using groups in the social network. Additionally, greater identification with and importance of non-using groups were associated with better environmental quality of life, whereas greater importance conferred on using groups was associated with reduced environmental quality of life.\ud \ud Conclusions\ud Support was found for the role of social identity processes in reported recovery capital and quality of life. Future research in larger, longitudinal samples is required to improve understanding of social identity processes during treatment and early recovery and its relationship to recovery stability.\ud \ud Keywords\ud \ud Social network Social identity Emerging adult Substance use Treatment Recovery Quality of life
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Arnett JJ. The developmental context of substance use in emerging adulthood. J Drug Issues. 2005;35:235-54.
    • 2. Australian Bureau of Statistics: National survey of mental health and wellbeing: Summary of results. Canberra, Australia: Australian Bureau of Statistics; 2008.
    • 3. Merikangas KR, McClair VL. Epidemiology of substance use disorders. Hum Genet. 2012;131:779-89.
    • 4. Best D, Wilson A, Reed M, Harney A, Pahoki S, Kutin J, et al. Youth cohort study: Young people's pathways through AOD treatment services. Turning Point Alcohol and Drug Centre: Melbourne, Australia; 2012.
    • 5. Cloud W, Granfield R. Conceptualizing recovery capital: Expansion of a theoretical construct. Subst Use Misuse. 2008;43:1971-86.
    • 6. Granfield R, Cloud W. Social context and “natural recovery”: The role of social capital in the resolution of drug-associated problems. Subst Use Misuse. 2001;36:1543-70.
    • 7. Laudet AB, White WL. Recovery capital as prospective predictor of sustained recovery, life satisfaction, and stress among former poly-substance users. Subst Use Misuse. 2008;43:27-54.
    • 8. White W, Cloud W. Recovery capital: A primer for addictions professionals. Counselor. 2008;9:22-7.
    • 9. Longabaugh R, Wirtz PW, Zweben A, Stout RL. Network support for drinking, Alcoholics Anonymous and long-term matching effects. Addiction. 1998;93:1313-33.
    • 10. Longabaugh R, Wirtz PW, Zywiak WH, O'Malley SS. Network support as a prognostic indicator of drinking outcomes: The COMBINE study. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2010;71:837-46.
    • 11. Litt MD, Kadden RM, Kabela-Cormier E, Petry N. Changing network support for drinking: Initial findings from the network support project. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007;75:542-55.
    • 12. Litt MD, Kadden RM, Kabela-Cormier E, Petry NM. Changing network support for drinking: Network support project 2-year follow-up. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009;77:229-42.
    • 13. Zywiak WH, Neighbors CJ, Martin RA, Johnson JE, Eaton CA, Rohsenow DJ. The Important People Drug and Alcohol interview: Psychometric properties, predictive validity, and implications for treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009;36:321-30.
    • 14. Zywiak WH, Longabaugh R, Wirtz PW. Decomposing the relationships between pretreatment social network characteristics and alcohol treatment outcome. J Stud Alcohol. 2002;63:114-21.
    • 15. Rosenquist J, Murabito J, Fowler JH, Christakis NA. The spread of alcohol consumption behavior in a large social network. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:426-33.
    • 16. Moos RH. Theory-based active ingredients of effective treatments for substance use disorders. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;88:109-21.
    • 17. Moos RH. Active ingredients of substance use-focused self-help groups. Addiction. 2008;103:387-96.
    • 18. Moos RH. Processes that promote recovery from addictive disorders. In: Kelly JF, White WL, Totowa NJ, editors. Addiction recovery management: Theory, research and practice. USA: Humana Press; 2011.
    • 19. Buckingham SA, Frings D, Albery IP. Group membership and social identity in addiction recovery. Psychol Addict Behav. 2013;27(4):1132-40.
    • 20. Tajfel H, Turner JC. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: Austin WG, Worchel S, editors. The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole; 1979.
    • 21. Best D, Beckwith M, Haslam C, Haslam SA, Jetten J, Mawson E, et al. Overcoming alcohol and other drug addiction as a process of social identity transition: The Social Identity Model of Recovery (SIMOR). Addiction Research & Theory. 2015. Advance online publication.
    • 22. Jetten J, Haslam C, Haslam SA, Dingle G, Jones JM. How groups affect our health and well-being: The path from theory to policy. Social Issues and Policy Review. 2014;8:103-30.
    • 23. Jetten J, Pachana N. Not wanting to grow old: A Social Identity Model of Identity Change (SIMIC) analysis of driving cessation among older adults. In: Jetten J, Haslam C, Haslam SA, editors. The social cure: Identity, health and well-being. New York, NY, USA: Psychology Press; 2012.
    • 24. Kreiner GE, Ashforth BE. Evidence toward an expanded model of organizational identification. J Organ Behav. 2004;25:1-27.
    • 25. Rodriguez L, Smith J: 'Finding Your Own Place': An interpretative phenomenological analysis of young men's experience of early recovery from addiction. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction 2014;12:477-90.
    • 26. Anderson TL. A cultural-identity theory of drug abuse. Sociology of Crime, Law, and Deviance. 1998;1:233-62.
    • 27. Schofield PE, Pattison PE, Hill DJ, Borland R. Youth culture and smoking: Integrating social group processes and individual cognitive processes in a model of health-related behaviours. J Health Psychol. 2003;8:291-306.
    • 28. Vik PW, Grizzle KL, Brown SA. Social resource characteristics and adolescent substance abuse relapse. J Adolesc Chem Depend. 1992;2:59-74.
    • 29. Beckwith M, Best D, Dingle G, Perryman C, Lubman D. Predictors of flexibility in social identity among people entering a therapeutic community for substance abuse. Alcohol Treatment Quarterly 2015, 33:93-104.
    • 30. Dingle GA, Stark CS, Cruwys T, Best D. Breaking good: Breaking ties with social groups may be good for recovery from substance misuse. Br J Soc Psychol. 2015;54:236-54.
    • 31. Humeniuk R, Henry-Edwards S, Ali R, Poznyak V, Monteiro M. The Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST): Manual for use in primary care. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2010.
    • 32. Groshkova T, Best D, White W. The assessment of recovery capital: properties and psychometrics of a measure of addiction recovery strengths. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2013;32:187-94.
    • 33. The WHOQOL Group. Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life assessment. Psychol Med. 1998;28:551-8.
    • 34. Jetten J, Haslam C, Pugliese C, Tonks J, Haslam S. Declining autobiographical memory and the loss of identity: Effects on well-being. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2010;32:408-16.
    • 35. Best D, Lubman D, Savic M, Wilson A, Dingle G, Haslam SA, Haslam C, Jetten J: Social identity and transitional identity: Exploring social networks and their significance in a therapeutic community setting. Therapeutic Communities 2014;35:10-20.
    • 36. Haslam C, Holme A, Haslam SA, Iyer A, Jetten J, Williams W. Maintaining group memberships: Social identity continuity predicts well-being after stroke. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2008;18:671-91.
    • 37. Iyer A, Jetten J, Tsivrikos D, Postmes T, Haslam S. The more (and the more compatible) the merrier: Multiple group memberships and identity compatibility as predictors of adjustment after life transitions. Br J Soc Psychol. 2009;48:707-33.
    • 38. Daley K. The ethics of doing research with young drug users. In The Australian Sociological Association Annual Conference; December 1-4, 2009. Canberra: Australian National University; 2009.
    • 39. Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS. 3rd ed. London, UK: Sage Publications; 2009.
    • 40. Gravetter FJ, Wallnau LB. Statistics for the behavioural sciences. 7th ed. USA: Thomson Wadsworth; 2007.
    • 41. Best D, Honor S, Karpusheff J, Loudon L, Hall R, Groshkova T, et al. Wellbeing and recovery functioning among substance users engaged in posttreatment recovery support groups. Alcohol Treat Q. 2012;30:397-406.
    • 42. Hibbert LJ, Best D. Assessing recovery and functioning in former problem drinkers at different stages of their recovery journeys. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2011;30:12-20.
    • 43. Hawthorne G, Herrman H, Murphy B. Interpreting the WHOQOL-Brèf: Preliminary population norms and effect sizes. Soc Indic Res. 2006;77:37-59.
    • 44. World Health Organisation. WHOQOL User Manual. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisation; 1998.
    • 45. Cloud W, Granfield R. Natural recovery from substance dependency: Lessons for treatment providers. J Soc Work Pract Addict. 2001;1:83-104.
    • 46. Schönbrodt FD, Perugini M. At what sample size do correlations stabilize? J Res Pers. 2013;47:609-12.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok