LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Kerr, Norbert L.; Tindale, Scott (2014)
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Languages: English
Types: Part of book or chapter of book
Subjects: H
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Alder, M., & Ziglio, E. (1996). Gazing into the oracle: The Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health. London: Jessica Kingsley.
    • Allport, F. (1962). A structuronomic conception of behavior: Individual and collective: I. Structural theory and the master problem of social psychology. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 64(1), 3-30.
    • Altman, I., & Haythorn, W. W. (1967). The effects of social isolation and group composition on performance. Human Relations, 20, 313-340.
    • Anderson, A. B. (1975). Combined effects of interpersonal attraction and goal-path clarity on the cohesiveness of task oriented groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(1), 68-75.
    • Anderson, B. F. (1966). The psychology experiment: An introduction to the scientific method. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
    • Aronoff, J. (1967). Psychological needs and cultural systems: A case study. New York: Van Nostrand.
    • Aronoff, J., & Messé, L. A. (1971). Motivational determinants of small group-structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17, 319-324.
    • Arunachalam, V., & Dilla, W. N. (1995). Judgment accuracy and outcomes in negotiation: a causal modeling analysis of decision-aiding effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61(3), 289- 304.
    • Asch, S. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgment. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership and men (pp. 177-190). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Press.
    • Back, K. (1951). Influence through social communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 9-23.
    • Bakeman, R. (2000). Behavioral observation and coding. In H. Reis & C. Judd. Research methods in social psychology: A handbook (pp 138-159). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    • Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    • Bales, R. F. (1965). The equilibrium problem in small groups. In T. Parsons, R. F. Bales, R. F., & E. A. Shils (Eds.), Working papers in the theory of action (pp. 111-161). New York: Free Press.
    • Bales, R. F., & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1951). Phases in group problem solving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 485-495.
    • Bandura, A. (1962). Social learning through imitation. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Baron, R. S., & Kerr, N. L. (2003). Group process, group decision, group action (2nd Ed.). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
    • Barrick, M. R., & Alexander, R. A. (1987). A review of quality circle efficacy and the existence of positivefindings bias. Personnel Psychology, 40, 579-592.
    • Bartholomew, K., Henderson, A. J. Z., & Marcia, J. (2000). Coding semistructured interviews in social psychological research. In H. Reis & C. Judd. Research methods in social psychology: A handbook (pp 286- 312). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    • Betts, K. R., & Hinsz, V. B. (2010). Collaborative group memory: Processes, performance, and techniques for improvement. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(2), 119-130.
    • Borgatta, E. F., & Crowther, B. (1965). A workbook for the study of social interaction processes. Chicago: RandMcNally.
    • Bray, R., Kerr, N. L., & Atkin, R. (1978). Effects of group size, problem difficulty, and sex on group performance and member reactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1224-1240.
    • Brewer, M. B., & Kramer, R. M. (1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 543-549.
    • Bristol, T., & Fern, E. F. (1996). Exploring the atmosphere created by focus group interviews: Comparing consumers' feelings across qualitative techniques. Journal of the Market Research Society, 38, 185-195.
    • Bristol, T., & Fern, E. F. (2003). The effects of interaction on consumers' attitudes in focus groups. Psychology & Marketing 20(5), 433-454.
    • Brown, B. B. (1968). Delphi Process: A methodology used for the elicitation of opinions of experts. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
    • Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49.
    • Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3, 14-25.
    • Campbell, D. T. (1969). Definitional versus multiple operationism. Et al., 2, 14-17.
    • Cannell, C. F., & Kahn, R. (1968). Interviewing, In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The Handbook of social psychology, Vol. 2 (2nd ed.), Addison Wesley, Reading, MA (1968), pp. 526-595.
    • Chance, J. E., Goldstein, A. G. & McBride, L. (1975). Differential experience and recognition memory for faces. Journal of Social Psychology, 97, 243-253.
    • Choi, J., & Bowles, S. (2007). The coevolution of parochial altruism and war. Science, 318(5850), 636-640.
    • Chute, D. L. (1993). MacLaboratory for psychology: Successes, failures, economics, and outcomes over its decade of development. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 180-188.
    • Cillessen, A. H. N. (2009). Sociometric methods. In Rubin, Kenneth H. , Bukowski, William M., & Laursen, Brett (Eds), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups, Social, emotional, and personality development in context (pp. 82-99). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
    • Coch, L., & French, J. R. (1948). Overcoming resistance to change. Human Relations, 1, 512-532.
    • Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257-271.
    • Cohn, Jeffrey F., & Sayette, Michael A. (2010). Spontaneous facial expression in a small group can be automatically measured: An initial demonstration. Behavior Research Methods, 42(4), 1079-1079-1086.
    • Curseu, P. L., & Wessel, I. (2008). How do Virtual Teams Process Information? A Literature Review and Implications for Management. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(6), 628-652.
    • Dabbs, J. M., & Swiedler, T. C. (1983). Group AVTA: A microcomputer system for group voice chronography. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 15, 79-84.
    • Dalkey, N. C. (1968). Experiments in group prediction. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
    • Dalkey, N. C. (1969-1970). The Delphi method (#s RM-5888-PR, RM-5957-PR, RM-6115-PR, RM-6118-PR). Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
    • Dalkey, N. C., & Rourke, D. L. (1971). Experimental assessment of Delphi procedures with group value judgments. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
    • Davis, J. H., & Kerr, N. L. (1986). Thought experiments and the problem of sparse data in small-group performance research. In P. Goodman (Ed.), Designing effective work groups. New York: Jossey-Bass.
    • Davis, J. H., Kerr, N. L., Atkin, R., Holt, R., & Meek, D. (1975). The decision processes of 6- and 12-person mock juries assigned unanimous and 2/3 majority rules. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1-14.
    • Dawes, R. M., McTavish, J., & Shaklee, H. (1977). Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people's behavior in a commons dilemma situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 1-11.
    • Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H., & Gustafson, D. H. (1975). Group techniques for program planning. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
    • Delbecq, A. L.,Van deVen, A. H.,& Gustafson, D. H. (1986). Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Middleton, WI: Greenbriar.
    • Dennis, A. R., & Valacich, J. S. (1993). Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 531-537.
    • Dennis, A. R., & Williams, M. L. (2003). Electronic Brainstorming: Theory, Research, and Future Directions. In P. Paulus & B. Nijstad (Eds), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (160-178). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.
    • Deutsch, M., & Krauss, R. M. (1962). Studies of interpersonal bargaining. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 6, 52- 76.
    • Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497-509.
    • Diener, E., Lusk, R., DeFour, D., & Flax, R. (1980). Deindividuation: Effects of group size, density, number of observers, and group member similarity on self-consciousness and disinhibited behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 449-459.
    • Dowling, K. L., & St. Louis, R. D. (2000). Asynchronous implementation of the nominal group technique: Is it effective? Decision Support Systems, 29(3), 229-248.
    • Duggan, E. W. (2003). Generating systems requirements with facilitated group techniques. Human-Computer Interaction, 18(4), 373-394.
    • Fern, E. F. (2001). Advanced Focus Group Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    • Festinger, L., Reicken, H.W., & Schachter, S. (1956). When prophesy fails. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    • Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups. New York: Harper.
    • Filkins, J., Smith, C. M., & Tindale, R. S. (1998). The fairness of death qualified juries: A Metaanalytic/Simulation approach. In R. S. Tindale et al. (Eds.) Social psychological applications to social issues: Applications of theory and research on small groups. (Vol. 4, pp. 153-176). New York: Plenum Press.
    • Forsyth, D. R. (2009). Group dynamics (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
    • Frankel, S. (1987). NGT + MDS: An adaptation of the nominal group technique for ill-structured problems. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 23, 543-551.
    • Freedman, J. L., Klevansky, S., & Ehrlich, P. R. (1971). The effect of crowding on human task performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1, 7-25.
    • Futoran, G. C., Kelly, J. R., & McGrath, J. E. (1989). TEMPO: A time-based system for analysis of group interaction process. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10(3), 211-232.
    • Godwin, W. F., & Restle, F. (1974). The road to agreement: Subgroup pressures in small group consensus processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4), 500-509.
    • Guetzkow, H. (1968). Differentiation of roles in task oriented groups. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics: Research and theory (pp. 512-526). New York: Harper & Row.
    • Gustafson, D. H., Shukla, R. K., Delbecq, A., & Walster, G.W. (1973). A comparative study of differences in subjective likelihood estimates made by individuals, interacting groups, Delphi groups, and nominal groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 9, 280-291.
    • Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 8). New York: Academic Press.
    • Hannaford, P. L., Hans, V. P, & Munsterman, G. T. (2000). Permitting Jury Discussions during Trial: Impact of the Arizona Reform. Law & Human Behavior, 24(3), 359-382.
    • Hänninen, L., & Pastell, M. (2009). CowLog: Open-source software for coding behaviors from digital video. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 472-472-476.
    • Hansen, D., Shneiderman, B., & Smith, M. A. (2011). Analyzing social media networks with NodeXL: Insights from a connected world. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kauffman
    • Hare, A. P. (1976). Handbook of small group research (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.
    • Harvey, N., Harriea, C., & Fischer, I. (2000). Using advice and assessing its quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81(2), 252-273.
    • Hastie, R., Penrod, S. & Pennington, N. (1983). Inside the jury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    • Haxby, J., Parasuraman, R., LaLonde, F., & Abboud, H. (1993). SuperLab: General-purpose Macintosh software for human experimental psychology and psychological testing. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 400-405.
    • Haythorn, W. (1953). The influence of individual members on the characteristics of small groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 276-284.
    • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.Henrich, T. R., & Greene, T. J. (1991). Using the nominal group technique to elicit roadblocks to MRP II implementation. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 21, 335-338.
    • Helmer, O. (1966). The use of the Delphi technique in problems of educational innovations. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
    • Hertel, G., Geister, S., & Konradt, U. (2005). Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15, 69-95.
    • Hill, G. W. (1982). Group versus individual performance: Are n+1 heads better than one? Psychological Bulletin, 91, 517-539.
    • Hoffman, R., & MacDonald, J. (1993). Using HyperCard and Apple events in a network environment: Collecting data from simultaneous experimental sessions. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 114-126.
    • Hoffman, L. R., & Maier, N. R. F. (1964). Valence in the adoption of solutions by problem-solving groups: Concept, method, and results. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69(3), 264-271.
    • Hollingshead, A. B., McGrath, J. E., & O'Connor, K. M. (1993). Group task performance and communication technology: A longitudinal study of computer-mediated versus face-to-face work groups. Small Group Research, 24, 307-333.
    • Hunt, S. M. J. (1994). MacProbe: A Macintosh-based experimenter's workstation for the cognitive sciences. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 26, 345-351.
    • Hutchins, D. (1985). Quality circles handbook. London: Pitman.
    • Hyman, H. H. (1978). Interviewing in social research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    • Ingle, S. (1982). Quality circles master guide. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    • Jarvis, B. (2011). Personal communication, 10/20/2011.
    • Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (1988). Out-group homogeneity: Judgments of variability at the individual and group levels. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 778-788.
    • Judd, C. M., Smith, E. R., & Kidder, L. H. (1991). Research methods in social relations (6th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanavich.
    • Kafer, N. F. (1976). A sociometric method for identifying group boundaries. Journal of Experimental Education, 45, 71-74.
    • Kameda, T., Takezawa, M., & Hastie, R. (2003). The logic of social sharing: An evolutionary game analysis of adaptive norm development. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(1), 2-19.
    • Katz, N., Lazer, D., Arrow, H., & Contractor, N. (2005). The network perspective on small groups: Theory and research. In Theories of small groups: Interdisciplinary perspectives, edited by Poole, Marshall Scott, Hollingshead, Andrea B. (pp. 277-312)..Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications
    • Keeney, S., McKenna, H., & Hasson, F. (2011). The Delphi technique in nursing and health research. Oxford: Blackwell-Wiley.
    • Kelley, H. H., Condry, J. C., Dahlke, A., & Hill, A. (1965). Collective behavior in a simulated panic situation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1, 20-54.Kent, R. N., & McGrath, J. E. (1969). Task and group characteristics as factors influencing group performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5(4), 429-440.
    • Kerr, N. L. (1981). Social transition schemes: Charting the group's road to agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 684-702.
    • Kerr, N. L., & Bray, R. M. (2005). Simulation, realism, and the study of the jury. In Neil Brewer & Kipling Williams (Eds.), Psychology and law: An empirical perspective. New York: Guilford.
    • Kerr, N. L., & Huang, J. Y. (1986). How much difference does one juror make in jury deliberation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 325-343.
    • Kerr, N. L., & MacCoun, R. (1985). Effects of jury size and polling method on the process and product of jury decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 349-363.
    • Kerr, N. L., MacCoun, R., & Kramer, G. P. (1996) Bias in judgment: Comparing individuals and groups. Psychological Review, 103, 687-719.
    • Kerr, N. L., & Tindale, R. S. (2011). Group-based forecasting?: A social psychological analysis. Special Issue on “Enhancing group-based judgmental forecasting: Processes and priorities,” G. Wright & G. Rowe (Eds.), International Journal of Forecasting, 27(1), 14-40.
    • Keyton, J., & Beck, S. J. (2009). The influential role of relational messages in group interaction. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 13(1), 14-30.
    • Kiesler, S. (1997). Culture of the Internet. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    • Klein K. J., & Kozlowski S. W. J. (2000), A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. San Francisco, CA, US: Jossey-Bass.
    • Knoke, D., & Kuklinski, J. H. (1982). Network analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
    • Knoke, D., & Yang, S. (2008). Social network analysis (2nd Ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    • Komorita, S. S., & Chertkoff, J. M. (1973). A bargaining theory of coalition formation. Psychological Review, 80, 149-162.Korhonen, L. J. (1990). Nominal group technique. In M. W. Galbraith (Ed.), Adult learning methods (pp. 247-259). Melbourne, FL: Krieger.
    • Kravitz, D. A., & Martin, B. (1986). Ringelmann rediscovered: The original article. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 936-941.
    • Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2008). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    • Lago, P. P., Beruvides, M. G., Jian, J.-Y., Canto, A. Y., Sandoval, A., & Taraban, R. (2007). Structuring group decision making in a web-based environment by using the nominal group technique, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 52(2), 277-295.
    • Lampkin, E. C. (1972). Effects of n-dominance and group composition on task efficiency in laboratory triads. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 7(2), 189-202.
    • Larson, James R. (2007). Deep diversity and strong synergy: Modeling the impact of variability in members problem-solving strategies on group problem-solving performance. Small Group Research, 38(3), 413-436.
    • Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn't he help? New York: AppletonCentury-Crofts.
    • Latané, B., & L'Herrou, T. (1996). Spatial clustering in the conformity game: Dynamic social impact in electronic groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1218-1230.
    • Latané, B., Williams, K. D., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822-832.
    • Laughlin, P. R. (1996). Group decision making and collective induction. In E. Witte & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior (Vol 1., pp. 61-80). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Laughlin, P. R., Branch, L. G., & Johnson, H. H. (1969). Individual versus triadic performance on a unidimensional complementary task as a function of initial ability level. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12(2), 144-150.
    • Laughlin, P. R., Hatch, E. C,, Silver, J. S., & Boh, L. (2006). Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: Effects of group size. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 644- 651.
    • Laughlin, P. R., & Johnson, H. H. (1966). Groups and individual performance on a complementary task as a function of initial ability level. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 407-414.
    • Leavitt, H. J. (1951). Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 38-50.
    • Leggett-Dugosh, K., Paulus, P. B., Roland, E.J., & Yang, H.C. (2000). Cognitive stimulation in brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 722-735 .
    • Levin, M. L. (1976). Displaying sociometric structures: An application of interactive computer graphics for instruction and analysis. Simulation and Games, 7, 295-310.
    • Levine, J. M. (1978). GROUPCOM: A computer program for investigating social processes in small groups. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 10, 191-195.
    • Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585-634.
    • Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1997). Small groups. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
    • Lewin, K. (1953). Studies in group decision. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics: Research and theory. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
    • Lewin, K., Lippett, R., & White, R. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created “social climates.” Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 271-299.
    • Li, J., Seu, J., Evens, M., Michael, J., & Rovick, A. (1992). Computer dialogue system (CDS): A system for capturing computer-mediated dialogue. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 24, 535- 540.
    • Liamputtong, P. (2011). Focus Group Methodology: Principle and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    • Lindzey, G., & Borgatta, E. F. (1954). Sociometric measurement. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 405-448). Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    • MacLin, O. H., & MacLin, M. K. (2005). Coding observational data: A software solution. Behavior Research Methods, 37(2), 224-224-231.
    • Matsatsinis, N. F., Grigoroudis, E., & Samaras, A. (2005). Aggregation and disaggregation of preferences for collective decision-making. Group Decision and Negotiation, 14(3), 217-232.
    • Mayo, E. (1933). The human problems of an industrial civilization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    • McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    • McGrath, J. E., & Altermatt, T. W. (2001). Observation and analysis of group interaction over time: Some methodological and strategic choices. In M. Hogg & S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell Handbook in Social Psychology, Vol. 3. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
    • McGrath, J. E., & Altman, I. (1966). Small group research: A synthesis and critique of the field. New York: Holt.
    • McGrath, J. E., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1994). Groups interacting with technology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    • McGrath, J. E. & Tschan, F. (2004). Temporal Matters in Social Psychology: Examining the role of time in the lives of groups and individuals. Washington DC: APA Publications.
    • McGuire, T., Kiesler, S., & Siegel, S. (1987). Group and computer-mediated discussion effects in risk decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 917-930.
    • Messick, D. M., Wilke, H. A. M., Brewer, M. B., Kramer, R. M., Zemke, P. E., & Lui, J. (1983). Individual adaptations and structural change as solutions to social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 294-309.
    • Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Harper & Row.
    • Moreland, R. L. (1985). Social categorization and the assimilation of “new” group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1173-1190.
    • Moreland, R. L., Fetterman, J. D., Flagg, J. J.., & Swanenburg, K. L. (2010). Behavioral assessment practices among social psychologists who study small groups. In C. R. Agnew, D. E. Carlston, W. G. Graziano, & J. R. Kelly (Eds.), Then a miracle occurs: Focusing on behavior in social psychological theory and research (pp. 28-56). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Moreland, R. L., Hogg, M. A., & Hains, S. C. (1994). Back to the future: Social psychological research on groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 527-555.
    • Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (1982). Socialization in small groups: Temporal changes in individual-group relations. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 15, pp. 137-192). New York: Academic Press.
    • Moreno, J. L. (1953). Who shall survive? (Rev. ed.). Beacon, NY: Beacon House.
    • Mullen, B., Johnson, C., & Salas, E. (1991). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 3-24.
    • Newcomb, T. M. (1961). The acquaintance process. New York: Holt.
    • Nijstad, Bernard A. Group Performance. New York, NY, US: Psychology Press, 2009.
    • Nijstad, B.A., Stroebe W., & Lodewijkx, H. F. M. (2002). Cognitive stimulation and interference in groups. Exposure effects in an idea generation task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(6), 535-544.
    • Nijstad, B. A., Stroebe, W., & Lodewijkx, H. F. M. (2006). The illusion of group productivity: A reduction of failures explanation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(1), 31-48.
    • Noldus, L. P. J. J., Trienes, R. J. H., Hendriksen, A. H. M., Jansen, H., & Jansen, R. G. (2000). The observer video-pro: New software for the collection, management, and presentation of time-structured data from videotapes and digital media files. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 32(1), 197-197- 206.
    • Noma, E., & Smith, D. R. (1978). SHED: A FORTRAN IV program for the analysis of small group sociometric structure. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 10, 60-62.
    • Northway, M. L. (1967). A primer of sociometry (2nd ed.). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.Offner, A. K., Kramer, T. J., & Winter, J. P. (1996). The effects of facilitation, recording, and pauses on group brainstorming. Small Group Research, 27(2), 283-98.
    • Olson, J. S., Olson, G., Storreston, M., & Carter, M. (1994). Groupwork close up: A comparison of the group design process with and without a simple group editor. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 11, 321- 348.
    • Osborn, A. F. (1957). Applied imagination (Rev. ed.). New York: Scribner.
    • Oxley, N. L., Dzindolet, M. T., & Paulus, P. B. (1996). The effects of facilitators on the performance of brainstorming groups. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 11(4), 633-646.
    • Paul, S., Haseman, W. D., & Ramamurthy, K. (2004). Collective memory support and cognitive-conflict group decision-making: An experimental investigation. Decision Support Systems, 36(3), 261-281.
    • Park, J. (1991). Estimating success rates of quality circle programs: Public and private experiences. Public Administration Quarterly, 15(1), 133-146.
    • Park, S., & Golembiewski, R. T. (1991). An examination of the determinants of successful QC programs: Testing the influence of eleven situational features. Organization Development Journal, 9(4), 38-49.
    • Parson, T., & Bales, R. F. (1955). Family, socialization and interaction process. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
    • Paulus, P. B., & Dzindolet, M. T. (1993). Social influence processes in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 575-586.
    • Pereira, G. M., & Osburn, H. G. (2007). Effects of participation in decision making on performance and employee attitudes: A quality circles meta-analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 22(2), 145-153.
    • Philipsen, G., Mulac, A., & Dietrich, D. (1979). The effects of social interaction on group idea generation. Communication Monographs, 46, 119-125.
    • Rapoport, A. (1967). Optimal policies for the prisoner's dilemma game. Psychological Review, 74, 136-148.
    • Reis, H. T. (1983). The promise of naturalistic methods. New Directions for Methodology of Social & Behavioral Science, 15, 1-4.
    • Reis, H. T., & Stiller, J. (1992). Publication trends in JPSP: A three-decade review. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 465-472.
    • Ren, Y., Carley, K. M., & Argote, L. (2006). The contingent effects of transactive memory: When is it more beneficial to know what others know? Management Science, 52(5), 671-682.
    • Roethlisberger, F. J., & Dickson, W. J. (1939). Management and the worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    • Rohrbaugh, J. (1979). Improving the quality of group judgment: Social judgment analysis and the Delphi
    • technique. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 24, 73-92.
    • Rozin, P. (2001). Social psychology and science: Some lessons from Solomon Asch. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(1), 2-14.
    • Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (1999). The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: Issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 15, 353-375.
    • Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (2001): Expert opinions in forecasting: Role of the Delphi technique. In J. S. Armstrong (Ed.), Principles of forecasting: A handbook of researchers and practitioners (pp. 125-144). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Ruback, R. B., Dabbs, J. M., & Hopper, C. H. (1984). The process of brainstorming: An analysis with individual and group vocal parameters. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 558-567.
    • Runkle, P. & McGrath, J. E. (1972). Research on human behavior: A systematic guide to method. New York: Holt.
    • Sackman, H. (1975). Delphi critique: Expert opinion, forecasting, and group process. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
    • Sanderson, P. M. (1994). Handling complex real-world data with two cognitive engineering tools: COGENT and Mac-SHAPA. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 26, 117-124.
    • Sandys, M., & Dillehay, R. C. (1995). First-ballot votes, predeliberation dispositions, and final verdicts in jury trials. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 175-195.
    • Schachter, S. (1951). Deviation, rejection, and communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 190-207.
    • Schachter, S. (1959). The psychology of affiliation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    • Schachter, S., Ellertson, N., McBride, D., & Gregory, D. (1951). An experimental study of cohesiveness and productivity. Human Relations, 4, 229-238.
    • Schneider, W. (1991). Equipment is cheap, but the field must develop and support common software for psychological research. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 23, 114-116.
    • Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis: A handbook. London: Sage.
    • Scott, J., & Carrington, P. J. (2011). The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    • Seal, D. W., Bogart, L. M., & Ehrhardt, A. A. (1998). Small group dynamics: The utility of focus group discussions as a research method. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, Vol 2(4), 253-266.
    • Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(3), 515-530.
    • Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. New York: Harper.
    • Sherif, M. (1966). In common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
    • Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B., Hood, W., & Sherif, C. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation. Norman, OK: Institute of Group Relations.
    • Sherwin, R. G. (1975). Structural balance and the sociomatrix: Finding triadic valence structures in signed adjacency matrices. Human Relations, 28, 175-189.
    • Siegal, S., & Fouraker, L. E. (1960). Bargaining and group decision making: Experiments in bilateral monopoly. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    • Smith, E. R., & Conrey, F. R. (2007). Agent-based modeling: A new approach for theory building in social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(1), 1-18.
    • Sniezek, J. A. (1992). Groups under uncertainty: An examination of confidence in group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52(1), 124-155.
    • Sniezek, J. A., & Buckley, T. (1995). Cueing and cognitive conflict in judge-advisor decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(2), 159-174.
    • Sommers, R. (1959). Studies in personal space. Sociometry, 22, 247-260.
    • Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. B. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    • Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during group discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467-1478.
    • Stasser, G., Kerr, N. L., & Davis, J. H. (1989). Influence processes and consensus models in decision-making groups. In P. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
    • Steel, R. P., & Shane, G. S. (1986). Evaluation research on quality circles: Technical and analytical implications. Human Relations, 39, 449-468.
    • Steiner, I. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
    • Steiner, I. (1974). Whatever happened to the group in social psychology? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 94-108.
    • Steiner, I. (1986). Paradigms and groups. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 251-292). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
    • Stephan, F. F., & Mishler, E. G. (1952). The distribution of participation in small groups: An exponential approximation. American Sociological Review, 17, 598-608.Stephenson, B. Y., Michaelsen, L. K., & Franklin, S. G. (1982). An empirical test of the nominal group technique in state solar energy planning. Group & Organization Studies, 7, 320-334.
    • Stewart, D. W., Shamdasani, P. N., & Rook, D. (2006). Focus Groups: Theory and Practice (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    • Stroebe, W., & Diehl, M. (1994). Why groups are less effective than their members: On productivity losses in idea generating groups. European Review of Social Psychology, 5, 271-303.
    • Stroebe, W., Diehl, M., & Abakoumkin, G. (1992). The illusion of group effectivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 643-650.Stumpf, S. A., Freedman, R. A., & Zand, D. E. (1979). Judgmental decisions: A study of interactions among group membership, group functioning, and the decision situation. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 765-782.
    • Takagi, E. (1999). Solving social dilemmas is easy in a communal society: A computer simulation analysis. In M. Foddy, et al. (Eds.), Resolving social dilemmas: Dynamic, structural, and intergroup aspects. New York, NY, US: Psychology Press.
    • Tajfel, H., Billig, M., Bundy, R., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-178.
    • Tapp, J., & Walden, T. (1993). PROCODER: A professional tape control, coding, and analysis system for behavioral research using videotape. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 53-56.
    • Tetlock, P. E. (1979). Identifying victims of groupthink from public statements of decision makers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(8), 1314-1324.
    • Tindale, R. S. & Nagao, D. H. (1986). An assessment of the potential utility of "Scientific Jury Selection": A "thought experiment" approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 409-425.
    • Tindale, R. S. & Vollrath, D. A. (1992). "Thought experiments" in applied social research. In F. B. Bryant, J. E. Edwards, R. S. Tindale, E. J. Posavac, L. Heath, E. Henderson, & Y. Suarez-Balcazar (Eds.), Social psychological applications to social issues: Methodological issues in applied social research (Vol. 2, pp. 219-238). New York: Plenum Press.
    • Valacich, J. S., Dennis, A. R., & Connolly, T. (1994). Idea generation in computer-based groups: A new ending to an old story. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 57, 448-467.
    • Van de Ven, A. H. (1974). Group decision making and effectiveness: An experimental study. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.
    • Vaughan, J., & Yee, P. L. (1994). Using PsyScope for demonstrations and student-designed experiments in cognitive psychology courses. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 26, 142-147.
    • Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., & Sinagub, J. (1996). Focus group interviews in education and psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    • Wallack, M. A., Kogan, W., & Bem, D. J. (1962). Group influence in individual risk taking. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 75-86.
    • Walster, E.,Walster, G., & Bersheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
    • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    • Watanabe, Y. & Yamagishi, T. (1999). Emergence of Strategies in a Selective Play Environment with Geographic Mobility: A Computer Simulation. In M. Foddy, et al. (Eds.), Resolving social dilemmas: Dynamic, structural, and intergroup aspects. New York, NY, US: Psychology Press.
    • Weber, A. L., & Harvey, J. H. (Eds.). (1994). Perspectives on close relationships. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
    • Weick, K. E. (1985). Systematic observational methods. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 567-634). New York: Random House.Weingart, L. (1997). How Did They Do That? The Ways and Means of Studying Group Processes. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior 19, 189-239.
    • Weldon, E., & Weingart, L. R. (1993). Group goals and group performance. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32(4), 307-334.
    • Wheelan, S. A. (1994). Group processes: A developmental perspective. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
    • Whyte, W. F. (1943). Street corner society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    • Wilson, J. P., Aronoff, J., & Messé, L. A. (1975). Social structure, member motivation, and productivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1094-1098.
    • Wittenbaum, G. M., & Moreland, R. L. (2008). Small group research in social psychology: Topics and trends over time. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 187-208.
    • Wolfe, C. (1992). Using Authorware Professional for developing courseware. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 24, 273-276.
    • Yaniv, I., & Kleinberger, E. (2000). Advice taking in decision making: Egocentric discounting and reputation formation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83(2), 260-281.
    • Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269-274.
    • Zimmerman, P. H., Bolhuis, J. E., Willemsen, A., Meyer, E. S., & Noldus, L. P. J. J. (2009). The observer XT: A tool for the integration and synchronization of multimodal signals. Behavior Research Methods, 41(3), 731- 731-735.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article