LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Rangnekar, Dwijen
Publisher: Routledge
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: KN
The article is about implementing obligations under Article 27.3(b) of the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property (TRIPS). However, concerned with the fragmentation of international law in a globalised world, the article uses Kenya as a case study to interrogate the apparent choice and latitude in Article 27.3(b). At the TRIPS Council, Kenya has sought to locate Article 27.3(b) within a wider frame by adroitly norm-borrowing, and it canvassed for integrating norms and principles from other multilateral agreements into TRIPS. Yet, when introducing plant breeders' rights into domestic law, Kenya fails to either explore the apparent latitude or deliver on its rhetoric in Geneva. I explain this decoupling between Geneva rhetoric (ritual) and domestic law (behaviour) as another symptom of what Steinberg [(2002), ‘In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO’, International Organization, 56 (2), pp. 339–74)] characterises as ‘organised hypocrisy’ of the World Trade Organisation. In demonstrating that fragmentation in global legal architecture may not automatically emerge in domestic law, the article draws out the significance of attending to a domestic political economy of law-making.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Akroyd, S., Kiome, R.M. and Ndiritu, C.G. (2004), 'Financing Agricultural Research', in C.G. Ndiritu, J.K. Lynam and A.N. Mbabu (eds), Transformation of Agricultural Research Systems (East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press), pp. 361-82.
    • Anon. (1999). 'Initiatives for Sustainable Seed Systems in Africa', in Seed Policy and Programmes for Sub-Saharan Africa: Proceedings of the Regional Technical Meeting on Seed Policy and Programmes
    • D for Sub-Saharan Africa, Abidjan, Coˆte d'Ivoire, 23- 27 November 1998 (Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation), pp. 191 - 205.
    • Anuradha, R.V. (1997), 'In Search of Knowledge and Resources: Who Sows? Who Reaps?', Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 6 (3), pp. 263-73.
    • Aoki, K. and Luvai, K. (2007), 'Reclaiming “Common Heritage” Treatment in the International Plant Genetic Resources Regime Complex', Michigan State Law Review, 35 (1), pp. 35-70.
    • Bavikatte, K. and Robinson, D.F. (2011), 'Towards a People's History of the Law: Biocultural Jurisprudence and the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing', Law, Environment and Development Journal, 7 (1), pp. 35-51.
    • Bent, S.A., et al. (1987), Intellectual Property Rights in Biotechnology Worldwide (New York: Stockton Press).
    • Bolo, M. (2005), Agricultural Systems of Science, Technology and Innovation: The Case of Kenya's Floriculture Industry (Wageningen: Technical Centre for Agriculture and Rural Cooperation (CTA)).
    • Bragdon, S., Garforth, K. and Haapala, J.K., Jr. (2008), 'Safeguarding Biodiversity: The Convention on Biological Diversity', in G. Tansey and T. Rajotte (eds), The Future Control of Food: A Guide to International Negotiations and Rules on Intellectual Property, Biodiversity, and Food Security (London: Earthscan/ IDRC), pp. 82-114.
    • Braithwaite, J. and Drahos, P. (2000), Global Business Regulation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
    • Chimni, B.S. (2006), 'The World Trade Organization, Democracy and Development: A View from the South', Journal of World Trade, 40 (1), pp. 5-36.
    • Commission on Intellectual Property Rights (2002), Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy (London: Department for International Development).
    • Correa, C.M. (1994), Sovereign and Property Rights over Plant Genetic Resources (Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization).
    • Drahos, P. (2001), 'BITs and BIPs', The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 4 (6), pp. 791-808.
    • Drahos, P. (2002), 'Developing Countries and International Intellectual Property Standard-Setting', The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 5 (5), pp. 765-89.
    • Dutfield, G. (2008), 'Turning Plant Varieties into Intellectual Property: The UPOV Convention', in G. Tansey and T. Rajotte (eds), The Future Control of Food: A Guide to International Negotiations and Rules on Intellectual Property, Biodiversity, and Food Security (London: Earthscan/IDRC), pp. 27-47.
    • Ekpere, J.A. (2000), The OAU's Model Law: The Protection of the Rights of Local Communities, Farmers and Breeders, and for the Regulation of Access to Biological Resources, an Explanatory Booklet (Lagos: Organisation of African Unity).
    • Fischer-Lescano, A. and Teubner, G. (2004), 'Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law', Michigan Journal of International Law, 25 (4), pp. 999-1046.
    • Gaia Foundation and GRAIN (1998), Ten Reasons Not to Join UPOV (London: Gaia Foundation & GRAIN).
    • Gervais, D. (1998), The TRIPS Agreement: Drafting History and Analysis (London: Sweet & Maxwell).
    • Glowka, L., et al. (1994), A Guide to the Convention on Biological Diversity (Gland: IUCN).
    • GRAIN (2000), For a Full Review of TRIPs 27.3(b): An Update on Where Developing Countries Stand with the Push To Patent Life at WTO (Barcelona: GRAIN). Available from: http://www.grain.org/article/entries/39- for-a-full-review-of-trips-27-3-b [accessed 4 March 2012].
    • GRAIN (2005), 'Africa's Seed Laws: Red Carpet for Corporations', Seedling, 25 (July), pp. 28-35.
    • GRAIN and SANFEC. (2001), 'TRIPs-Plus' Through the Back Door: How Bilateral Treaties Impose Much Stronger Rules for IPRs on Life than the WTO (Barcelona: GRAIN & SANFEC).
    • Halewood, M. and Nnadozie, K. (2008), 'Giving Priority to the Commons: The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture', in G. Tansey and T. Rajotte (eds), The Future Control of Food: A Guide to International Negotiations and Rules on Intellectual Property, Biodiversity, and Food Security (London: Earthscan/IDRC), pp. 115-40.
    • Heitz, A. (1987), 'The History of Plant Variety Protection', in Anon. (ed.), The First Twenty-Five Years of the International Convention for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (Geneva: UPOV), pp. 53 - 96.
    • Helfer, L.R. (2004), 'Regime Shifting: The TRIPS Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking', Yale Journal of International Law, 29 (1), pp. 1-83.
    • Helfer, L.R. (2005), 'Comment II: Using Intellectual Property Rights to Preserve the Global Genetic Commons: The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture', in K.E. Maskus and J.H. Reichman (eds), International Public Goods and Transfer of Technology Under a Globalized Intellectual Property Regime (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 217-25.
    • IPGRI (1999), The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights - A Decision Check List (Rome: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute).
    • Jaffee, S. (1995), 'The Many Faces of Success: The Development of Kenyan Horticultural Efforts', in S. Jaffee and J. Morton (eds), Marketing Africa's High Value Foods (Washington, DC: World Bank), pp. 319-76.
    • Jaffee, S. and Srivastava, J. (1992), Seed System Development: The Appropriate Roles of the Private and Public Sector (Washington, DC: World Bank).
    • Jaffee, S. and Srivastava, J. (1994), 'The Roles of the Private and Public Sectors in Enhancing the Performance of Seed Systems', World Bank Research Observer, 9 (1), pp. 97-117.
    • Kameri-Mbote, P. (2005), Intellectual Property Protection in Africa: An Assessment of the Status of the Laws, Research and Policy Analysis of the Intellectual Property Rights in Kenya (London: International Environment Law Research Centre). IELRC Working Papers on Intellectual Property.
    • KARI (2005), Strategic Plan 2005 - 2015 (Nairobi: Kenyan Agricultural Research Institute).
    • Kuyek, D. (2002), Intellectual Property Rights in African Agriculture: Implications for Small Farmers (Barcelona: GRAIN).
    • Labaste, P. (2005), The European Horticulture Market: Opportunities for Sub-Saharan African Exporters (Washington, DC: World Bank), Working Paper No. 63.
    • Lange, P. (1993), 'Derived Plant Varieties under the Revised UPOV', Plant Variety Protection Gazette and Newsletter, 72 (November), pp. 51-63.
    • Leskien, D. and Flitner, M. (1997), Intellectual Property Rights and Plant Genetic Resources - Options for a Sui Generis System (Rome: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute), Genetic Resources No. 6.
    • Louwaars, N.P. (1998), 'Sui Generis Rights: From Opposing to Complementary Approaches', Biotechnology and Development Monitor, 36, pp. 13-16.
    • Louwaars, N.P., et al. (2005), Impacts of Strengthened Intellectual Property Rights Regimes on the Plant Breeding Industry in Developing Countries (Washington, DC: The World Bank).
    • Mangeni, F. (2000), Technical Issues on Protecting Plant Varieties by Effective Sui Generis Systems (Geneva: South Centre and Centre for International Environmental Law).
    • May, C. (2004), 'Capacity Building and the (Re)Production of Intellectual Property Rights', Third World Quarterly, 25 (5), pp. 821-37.
    • McCulloch, N. and Ota, N. (2002), Export Horticulture and Poverty in Kenya (Sussex: Institute of Development Studies), IDS Working Paper 174.
    • Ministry of Agriculture (2004), The Status of Maize Seed Industry in Kenya: Value Chain Analysis (Nairobi: Government of Kenya).
    • Minot, N. and Ngigi, M. (2004), Are Horticultural Exports a Replicable Success Story? Evidence from Kenya and Coˆte d'Ivoire (Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute).
    • Mooney, P.R. (1983), 'The Law of the Seed: Another Development and Plant Genetic Resources', Development Dialogue, 1983 (1 - 2), pp. 1-173.
    • Ndii, D. and Byerlee, D. (2004), 'Realizing the Potential for Private-Sector Participation in Agricultural Research in Kenya', in C.G. Ndiritu, J.K. Lynam and A.N. Mbabu (eds), Transformation of Agricultural Research Systems (East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press), pp. 339-59.
    • Ndiritu, C.G., Mbabu, A.N. and Lynam, J.K. (2004), Transformation of Agricultural Research Systems in Africa: Lessons from Kenya (East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press).
    • Otieno-Odek, J. (2001), Towards TRIPS Compliance: Kenya's Experience and Legislative Reforms (Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development).
    • Otten, A. (1996), 'Viewpoint of the WTO', in Agrobiodiversity and Farmers' Rights: Proceedings of a Technical Consultation on an Implementation Framework for Farmers' Rights (Madras: Macmillan & MS Swaminathan Research Foundation), pp. 44 - 50.
    • van Overwalle, G. (1999), 'Patent Protection for Plants: A Comparison of American and European Approaches', IDEA: The Intellectual Property Law Review, 39 (2), pp. 143-94.
    • Pistorius, R. and van Wijk, J. (1999), The Exploitation of Plant Genetic Information Political Strategies in Crop Development (Wallingford: CABI).
    • Pottage, A. and Sherman, B. (2007), 'Organisms and Manufactures: On the History of Plant Inventions', Melbourne University Law Review, 31 (2), pp. 539-68.
    • Rangnekar, D. (1999), 'Technology Paradigms and the Innovation-Appropriation Interface: An Examination of the Nature and Scope of Plant Breeders' Rights', Prometheus, 17 (2), pp. 125-38.
    • Rangnekar, D. (2002), Access to Genetic Resources, Gene-Based Inventions and Agriculture. Report to the Commission on Intellectual Property Rights of the UK Government (London: CIPR).
    • Rangnekar, D. (2006), Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: A Case Study of Kenya, A Report Prepared under the European Commission's 6th Framework Programme for Research (Contract No. 503613/Impacts of the IPR Rules on Sustainable Development, IPDEV).
    • Sahai, S. (2010), 'The Kernel of Bad Ethics', Tehelka [online], 7(19), 15 May. Available from: http://www. tehelka.com/story_main44.asp?filename=Op150510opinion.asp [accessed 20 May 2010].
    • Sassen, S. (2000), 'Territory and Territoriality in the Global Economy', International Sociology, 15 (2), pp. 372-93.
    • Scholte, J.A. (2005), Globalization: A Critical Introduction, 2nd ed. (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
    • Sell, S.K. (2003), Private Power, Public Law: The Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
    • Slaughter, A.M. (1997), 'The Real New World Order', Foreign Affairs, 76 (5), pp. 183-97.
    • STAK (2007), STAK News, II(06), February. Available from: http://www.businessadvocacy.org/dloads/ STAK070206.pdf [accessed 6 May 2013].
    • Steinberg, R.H. (2002), 'In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO', International Organization, 56 (2), pp. 339-74.
    • Stenson, A.J. and Gray, T. (1999), The Politics of Genetic Resource Control (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
    • Tarasofsky, R. (1997), 'The Relationship Between the TRIPs Agreement and the Convention on Biological Diversity: Towards a Pragmatic Approach', Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 6 (2), pp. 148-56.
    • The Crucible Group (1994), People, Plants and Patents: The Impact of Intellectual Property on Trade, Plant Biodiversity, and Rural Society (Ottawa: International Development Research Centre).
    • Tripp, R. and Rohrbach, D. (2001), 'Policies for African Seed Enterprise Development', Food Policy, 26 (2), pp. 147-61.
    • UNCTAD and ICTSD (2005), Resource Book on TRIPS and Development (New York: Cambridge University Press).
    • UPOV (1986), The Protection of Plant Varieties and the Debate on Biotechnological Inventions (Geneva: International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants), UPOV/INF/11.
    • UPOV (1994), Seminar on the Nature of and Rationale for the Protection of Plant Varieties under the UPOV Convention (Geneva: International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants), 737(E).
    • UPOV (1996), Examination of the Conformity of the Legislation of Kenya with the UPOV Convention (Geneva: International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants), C/30/13.
    • UPOV (1997), Report Adopted at the Thirtieth Ordinary Session of the Council of the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants on 23 October 1996 (Geneva: International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants), C/30/17.
    • UPOV (1998), Report Adopted at the Thirty-First Ordinary Session of the Council of the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants on 29 October 1997 (Geneva: International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants), C/31/17.
    • UPOV (2000), Report Adopted at the Thirty-Second Ordinary Session of the Council of the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants on 28 October 1998 (Geneva: International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants), C/32/16.
    • UPOV (2005), UPOV Report on the Impact of Plant Variety Protection (Geneva: International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants), Publication No. 353 (E).
    • Verma, S.K. (1995), 'TRIPS and Plant Variety Protection in Developing Countries', European Intellectual Property Review, 17 (6), pp. 281-89.
    • Waiyaki, N., Mwakubo, S. and Odhiambo, W. (2005), Determinants of Seed Maize Pricing: A Value Chain Analysis (Nairobi: Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis).
    • Watal, J. (2000), Intellectual Property Rights in the WTO and Developing Countries (The Hague: Kluwer Law International).
    • WTO (1999a), Communication from Kenya on Behalf of the African Group, Review of Provisions of Art. 27.3(b) (8 November), IP/C/W/163.
    • WTO (1999b), Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights - Minutes of Meeting Held in the Centre William Rappard on 26 - 29 June 2000 (14 August 2000), IP/C/M/27.
    • WTO (1999c), Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights - Minutes of Meeting Held in the Centre William Rappard on 7 - 8 July 1999 (17 August), IP/C/M/24.
    • WTO (1999d), Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights - Minutes of Meeting Held in the Centre William Rappard on 20- 21 October 1999 (22 December), IP/C/M/25.
    • WTO (2000), Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights - Minutes of Meeting Held in the Centre William Rappard on 21 - 22 September 2000 (23 November), IP/C/M/28.
    • WTO (2001), Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, Ministerial Conference, Doha (November), WT/Min (01)/Dec/W/2.
    • WTO (2002a), Communication from Kenya on Behalf of the African Group, Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights - Proposal on Paragraph 6 of the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health (24 June), IP/C/W/351.
    • WTO (2002b), Communication from Kenya, Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights - Elements of a Paragraph 6 Solution (14 November), IP/C/W389.
    • WTO (2002c), Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights - Minutes of Meeting Held in the Centre William Rappard on 5 - 7 March 2002 (22 March), IP/C/M/35.
    • WTO (2003), Decision of the General Council on Implementing Paragraph 6 of the Doha Declaration, adopted 30 August, WT/L/540.
    • WTO (2004a), Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, Review of Legislation: Kenya (7 May), IP/Q4/KEN/1.
    • WTO (2004b), Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights - Minutes of Meeting Held in the Centre William Rappard on 18 November 2003 (4 February), IP/C/M/42.
    • WTO (2005), Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights - Minutes of Meeting Held in the Centre William Rappard on 1 - 2 December 2004 (11 January), IP/C/M/46.
    • WTO (2008), General Council, Trade Negotiations Committee, Doha Work Programme - Relationship Between the TRIPS Agreement and the Convention of Biological Diversity (28 May), WT/GC/W/590, TN/C/W/49.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article