Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Farini, Federico (2008)
Publisher: Faculty of Social Work, University of Ljubljana
Languages: English
Types: Article
In the years 2004-2006 the Education Office and the Social Polices and Integration Office at the City Council of Modena designed three projects addressed to sustain social participation of Children of International Migrants (CIM) empowering their active citizenship. The premise of these interventions was that social integration depends on social participation. Social participation describes social actions that are both autonomous and visible in society.\ud This projects looked at citizenship not as a sort of cognitive status to be reached but as the outcome of the experience of everyday participation to social processes. The activities proposed to CIM wanted to stimulate a reflection about everyday experience of participation to host social processes, with the help of adult social operators.\ud Our research highlights that once they materialised in concrete interactions all of these three projects produced paradoxical results: it was possible to observe that social operators systematically violated CIM spaces of communication, that is to say CIM opportunities to experience, in the context of the social interventions, an active and autonomous social participation. Social operators interfered with CIM autonomous participation to interactions as soon as it brought about meanings inconsistent with the ideological and theoretical premises of the interventions; this brought CIM to mistrust their opportunity of an autonomous social participation.\ud A social intervention aiming to offer an opportunity to experience social participation needs a communication form specialised in promoting self-expression of communicators, a communication form that creates mutual trust, that is able explore common ground and continuity of views between interlocutors. We offer a sketch of a communication form that promises to be much more effective than education in sustaining social integration of young migrants by mean of the promotion of their autonomous participation. This communication form is called “dialogue”.\ud The limits of educational communication suggest that for social workers that operates among adolescents and young adults, dialogue is an opportunity to experiment, to make their work more effective and the projects in which they are involved more efficient.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Baraldi, C. (2003a), La sfida della partecipazione. In: Baraldi, C., Maggioni, G., Mittica. M.P. (Eds.), Pratiche di partecipazione, Teorie e metodi di intervento con bambini ed adolescenti. Roma: Donzelli Editore (3 - 30) - (2003b), Comunicazione interculturale e diversità. Roma: Carocci - (2005), Conflict Management in Interlingual and intercultural mediation. Paper presented at the Fourth Biennial Conference on Intercultural Research, Kent State University, May 4-7
    • Baraldi, C., Iervese, V. (2003), Come nasce la prevaricazione, una ricerca nella scuola dell'obbligo. Roma: Donzelli Editore
    • Baraldi, C., La Palombara, A., Iervese, V. (2001), Il bambino salta il muro. Bergamo: Junior Edizioni
    • Fairley, M.S. (2000), Troublesome discourse: analysis of native-non native language speakers conversation. Http://www.eric.ed.gov
    • Gergen, K., McNamee, S., Barrett, F. (2001), Toward transformative dialogue. International Journal of Public Administration, 24: 697-707
    • Goodwin, C. (1981), Conversational Organization: Interaction Between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press.
    • Gudykunst, W.B. (1994), Bridging differences. Effective intergroup communication. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    • J. Heritage (1995), Conversation Analysis: methodological aspects. In: Quasfthoff, U.M. (Ed) Aspects of oral communication. Berlin-New York: Walter de Gruyter (391-416).
    • - (2002), The limits of questioning: negative interrogatives and hostile question content. Journal of Pragmatics, 34: 1427-1446
    • Heyting, F., Kruithof, B., Mulder, E. (2002), Education and social integration: on basic consensus and the cohesion of society. Educational theory, 52,4: 381--396
    • Iervese, V., Farini, F. (2006), La ricerca qualitativa. In: Pezzotta, B. (Ed) Children of Migrants Inclusion Creative Systems Project, Rapporto internazionale di ricerca. Modena: Comune di Modena/Ufficio Stranieri (157-191)
    • Isajiw, W.W. (2000), Approaches to ethnic conflict resolution: paradigms and principles. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 24: 105-124.
    • Jefferson, G. (2004), Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In: Lerner, G. (Ed), Conversation analysis. Studies from the first generation. New York: John Benjamins.
    • Kim, Y.Y. (2001), Becoming intercultural. An integrative theory of communication and crosscultural adaptation. London: Sage.
    • Lawy, R., Biesta, G. (2006), Citizenship-as-practice: the educational implications of an inclusive and relational understanding of citizenship. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54, 1: 34-50
    • Le aree di priorità sociale. Esclusione sociale, dipendenze e immigrazione. Analisi dei programmi attuativi 2003 e dei piani di zona sperimentali 2002-2003. (2003), Provincia di Modena
    • Littlejohn, S.W. (2004), The Transcendent Communication Project: Searching for a praxis of dialogue. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 21, 3, 327-359. Luhmann, N. (1984), Soziale systeme. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
    • Luhmann, N., Schorr, K.E. (1999), Il sistema educativo, problemi di riflessività. Roma:Armando. Moscovici, S. (1976), Social influence and social change. New York: Academic Press Parsons, T. (1951), The social system. New York: The Free Press,
    • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., Jefferson, G. (1974), A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735
    • Schegloff, E.A. (1991), Conversation Analysis and Socially Shared Cognition. In Resnick, L., Levine, S., (Eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association (150-171)
    • - (2006), Interaction: The Infrastructure for Social Institutions, the Natural Ecological Niche for Language, and the Arena in which Culture is Enacted. In: Enfield, N.J., Levinson, S.,C. (Eds), Roots of Human Sociality Culture, Cognition and Interaction. Oxford: Berg Publisher (69-96)
    • Schneider, W.L. (2000). The sequential production of social acts in conversation. Human studies, 23: 123-144
    • Tajfel, H. (1981), Human groups and social categories. Studies in social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    • Vanderstraeten, R. (2000), Autopoiesis and socialization: on Luhmann's reconceptualization of communication and socialization. British Journal of Sociology, 51, 3: 581-598
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article