Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Gouda, M. M.; Danaher, Sean; Underwood, Chris (2001)
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: H200, H700
Most heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) control systems are considered as temperature control problems. In this work, the predicted mean vote (PMV) is used to control the indoor temperature of a space by setting it at a point where the PMV index becomes zero and the predicted percentage of persons dissatisfied (PPD) achieves a maximum threshold of 5%. This is achieved through the use of a fuzzy logic controller that takes into account a range of human comfort criteria in the formulation of the control action that should be applied to the heating system to bring the space to comfort conditions. The resulting controller is free of the set up and tuning problems that hinder conventional HVAC controllers. Simulation results show that the proposed control strategy makes it possible to maximize the indoor thermal comfort and, correspondingly, a reduction in energy use of 20% was obtained for a typical 7-day winter period when compared with conventional control.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1 Fanger PO. Thermal comfort, analysis and application in environmental engineering. McGrawHill, 1972.
    • 2 Gagge AP, Fobelets AP, Berglund LG. A standard predictive index of human response to the thermal environment. ASHRAE Trans 1986; 92: 709-31.
    • 3 Sherman M. A simplified model of thermal comfort. Energy and Buildings 1985; 8: 37-50.
    • 4 Hamdi M, Lachiver G, Michaud F. A new predictive thermal sensation index of human response. Energy and Buildings 1999; 29: 167-78.
    • 5 ASHRAE Fundamentals, chap. 8, ASHRAE, Atlanta, GA, 8.1-8.29, 1993.
    • 6 International Standard ISO 7730. Moderate thermal comfort control environments - Determination of the PMV and PPD indices and specification of the conditions for thermal comfort, 1994.
    • 7 Auliciems A. Thermobile controls for human comfort. The Heating and Ventilation Engineer 1984; 31-3.
    • 8 Fountain M, Brager G, Arens E, Bauman F, Benton C. Comfort control for short-term occupancy. Energy and Buildings 1994; 21: 1-13.
    • 9 Culp CH, Rhodes ML, Krafthefer BC, Listvan M. Silicon infrared sensors for thermal comfort and control. ASHRAE Journal 1993; 38-42.
    • 10 MacArthur JW. Humidity and predicted mean vote based comfort control. ASHRAE Trans. 1986; 1: 5-17.
    • 11 King PJ, Mamdani EH. The application of fuzzy control systems to industrial processes. Automatica 1977; 13: 235-42.
    • 12 Gouda MM, Danaher S, Underwood CP. Modelling the heating of a building space using Matlab and Simulink. Proceedings of IMACS Symposium on Mathematical Modelling, Vienna, 2000; 1: 91-4.
    • 13 Gouda MM, Danaher S, Underwood CP. Loworder model for the simulation of a building and its heating system. Building Serv. Eng. Res. Technol. 2000; 21: 203-12.
    • 14 Dounis AI, Santamouris MJ, Lefas CC, Manolakis DE. Thermal comfort degradation by a visual comfort fuzzy reasoning machine under natural ventilation. Applied Energy 1994; 48: 115-30.
    • 15 CIBSE Guide part C, section C1.
    • 16 Psychrometrics: theory and practice. Georgia: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc, 1996.
    • 17 ASHRAE, Systems handbook. Georgia: ASHRAE Inc, 1984.
    • 18 Haines RW. HVAC systems design handbook. USA: TAB Books, 1988.
    • 19 MathWorks. Matlab user manual. MA: Natick, 1993.
    • 20 Lee CC. Fuzzy logic in control systems: fuzzy logic controller part 1. IEEE Trans. System Man. Cyb. 1990; 20.
    • 21 Lee CC, Fuzzy logic in control systems: fuzzy logic controller part 2. IEEE Trans. System Man. Cyb. 1990; 20.
    • 22 Gouda MM, EL-Ghotmy M, EL-Rabaie N, Sharaf MM. Fuzzy logic control for a turbogenerator, Proceedings 5th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications (ICAIA), Cairo, Egypt, 1997; 1: 592-601.
    • 23 Gouda MM, Danaher S, Underwood CP. Fuzzy logic controller versus conventional PID controller for controlling indoor temperature of a building space. Computer Aided Control System Design (CACSD 2000) Conference. Salford University, UK, 2000.
    • 24 Mamdani EH. Application of fuzzy algorithms for control of simple dynamic plant. Inst. Elect. Eng. Contr. Sci. 1974; 121: 1585-8.
    • 25 Sugeno M, Takagi T. Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cyb. 1985; SMC-15, 116-32.
    • 26 Pedrycz W. Fuzzy control and fuzzy systems. USA: JohnWiley & Sons Inc, 1989.
    • The saturation pressure over water (0 ² T ² 200): 3 ln(Pwsat ) = å biT i-1 + b4 ln(T ) i=-1 (A1-4) PMV = (0.352 exp(-0.42Met) + 0.032) ´ (Met - 0.35(43 - 0.061Met - pv) - 0.42(Met - 50) - 0.0023Met(44 - pv) - 0.0014Met(34 - Ti) - 3.4 ´ 10-8 fcl((Tcl + 273)4 - Tmrt + 273)4 - fclhc(Tcl - Ti)) (B1-1) (A1-6)
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article