Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Wilkinson, Mick; Caplan, Nick; Akenhead, Richard; Hayes, Phil (2015)
Publisher: ClinMed International Library
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: C600

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: human activities
We examined acute alterations in gait and oxygen cost from shod-to-barefoot running in habitually-shod well-trained runners with no prior experience of running barefoot. Thirteen runners completed six-minute treadmill runs shod and barefoot on separate days at a mean speed of 12.5 km·h-1. Steady-state oxygen cost in the final minute was recorded. Kinematic data were captured from 30-consecutive strides. Mean differences between conditions were estimated with 90% confidence intervals. When barefoot, stride length and ground-contact time decreased while stride rate increased. Leg-and vertical stiffness and ankle-mid-stance dorsi-flexion angle increased when barefoot while horizontal distance between point of contact and the hip decreased. Mean oxygen cost decreased in barefoot compared to shod running (90% CI -11% to -3%) and was related to change in ankle angle and point-of-contact distance, though individual variability was high (-19% to +8%). The results suggest that removal of shoes produces an alteration in running gait and a potentially-practically-beneficial reduction in mean oxygen cost of running in trained-habitually-shod runners new to running barefoot. However, high variability suggests an element of skill in adapting to the novel task and that caution be exercised in assuming the mean response applies to all runners.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Jenkins DW, Cauthon DJ (2011) Barefoot running claims and controversies: a review of the literature. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 101: 231-246.
    • 2. Robbins SE, Gouw GJ, Hanna AM (1989) Running-related injury prevention through innate impact-moderating behavior. Med Sci Sports Exerc 21: 130- 139.
    • 3. Robbins SE, Hanna AM, Gouw GJ (1988) Overload protection: avoidance response to heavy plantar surface loading. Med Sci Sports Exerc 20: 85-92.
    • 4. Robbins SE, Gouw GJ (1991) Athletic footwear: unsafe due to perceptual illusions. Med Sci Sports Exerc 23: 217-224.
    • 5. Robbins SE, Hanna AM (1987) Running-related injury prevention through barefoot adaptations. Med Sci Sports Exerc 19: 148-156.
    • 6. Lieberman DE, Venkadesan M, Werbel WA, Daoud AI, D'Andrea S, et al. (2010) Foot strike patterns and collision forces in habitually barefoot versus shod runners. Nature 463: 531-535.
    • 7. Divert C, Mornieux G, Baur H, Mayer F, Belli A (2005) Mechanical comparison of barefoot and shod running. Int J Sports Med 26: 593-598.
    • 8. De Wit B, De Clercq D, Aerts P (2000) Biomechanical analysis of the stance phase during barefoot and shod running. J Biomech 33: 269-278.
    • 9. Squadrone R, Gallozzi C (2009) Biomechanical and physiological comparison of barefoot and two shod conditions in experienced barefoot runners. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 49: 6-13.
    • 10. Burkett LN, Kohrt WM, Buchbinder R (1985) Effects of shoes and foot orthotics on VO2 and selected frontal plane knee kinematics. Med Sci Sports Exerc 17: 158-163.
    • 11. Catlin MJ, Dressendorfer RH (1979) Effect of shoe weight on the energy cost of running. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 11: 80.
    • 12. Conley DL, Krahenbuhl GS (1980) Running economy and distance running performance of highly trained athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 12: 357-360.
    • 13. Hanson NJ, Berg K, Deka P, Meendering JR, Ryan C (2011) Oxygen cost of running barefoot vs. running shod. Int J Sports Med 32: 401-406.
    • 14. Frederick EC (1984) Physiological and ergonomics factors in running shoe design. Appl Ergon 15: 281-287.
    • 15. Flaherty RF (1994) Running economy and kinematic differences among running with the foot shod, with the foot bare, and with the foot equated for weight. MSc, Springfield College.
    • 16. Divert C, Mornieux G, Freychat P, Baly L, Mayer F, et al. (2008) Barefootshod running differences: shoe or mass effect? Int J Sports Med 29: 512-518.
    • 17. Perl DP, Daoud AI, Lieberman DE (2012) Effects of footwear and strike type on running economy. Med Sci Sports Exerc 44: 1335-1343.
    • 18. Franz JR, Wierzbinski CM, Kram R (2012) Metabolic cost of running barefoot versus shod: is lighter better? Med Sci Sports Exerc 44: 1519-1525.
    • 19. Frederick E, Daniels JT, Hayes JW (1984) The effect of shoe weight on the aerobic demands of running. In: Bachl N, Prokop L, Suckert R. Current topics in sports medicine. Urban & Schwarzenberg, Vienna: 616-625.
    • 20. Ker RF, Bennett MB, Bibby SR, Kester RC, Alexander RM (1987) The spring in the arch of the human foot. Nature 325: 147-149.
    • 21. Alexander R, Goldspink G (1977) Mechanics and energetics of animal locomotion. Chapman and Hall Ltd: London.
    • 22. Moore IS, Jones AM, Dixon S (2014) The pursuit of improved running performance: Can changes in cushioning and somatosensory feedback influence running economy and injury risk. Footwear Science 6: 1-11.
    • 23. Jones AM, Doust JH (1996) A 1% treadmill grade most accurately reflects the energetic cost of outdoor running. J Sports Sci 14: 321-327.
    • 24. Jones AM (2007) Middle- and long-distance running. In: Winter EM, Jones AM, Davison RC, Bromley PD, Mercer TH. Sport and exercise physiology testing guidelines: The british association of sport and exercise sciences guide, volume 1 - sport testing. Routledge: Oxford: 147-154.
    • 25. Cooke CB (1996) Maximal oxygen uptake, economy and efficiency. In: Eston R, Reilly T. Kinanthropometry and exercise physiology laboratory manual: Tests, procedures and data, volume 2 - exercise physiology. Routledge, London: 161-193.
    • 26. Hayes PR, French DN, Thomas K (2011) The effect of muscular endurance on running economy. J Strength Cond Res 25: 2464-2469.
    • 27. Morin JB, Dalleau G, Kyröläinen H, Jeannin T, Belli A (2005) A simple method for measuring stiffness during running. J Appl Biomech 21: 167-180.
    • 28. Gruber AH, Freedman Silvernail J, Brueggemann P, Rohr E, Hamill J (2013) Footfall patterns during barefoot running on harder and softer surfaces. Footwear Science 5: 39-44.
    • 29. Batterham AM, Hopkins WG (2006) Making meaningful inferences about magnitudes. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 1: 50-57.
    • 30. Saunders PU, Telford RD, Pyne DB, Peltola EM, Cunningham RB, et al. (2006) Short-term plyometric training improves running economy in highly trained middle and long distance runners. J Strength Cond Res 20: 947-954.
    • 31. Spurrs RW, Murphy AJ, Watsford ML (2003) The effect of plyometric training on distance running performance. Eur J Appl Physiol 89: 1-7.
    • 32. Warne JP, Warrington GD (2014) Four-week habituation to simulated barefoot running improves running economy when compared with shod running. Scand J Med Sci Sports 24: 563-568.
    • 33. Ridge ST, Johnson AW, Mitchell UH, Hunter I, Robinson E, et al. (2013) Foot bone marrow edema after a 10-wk transition to minimalist running shoes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 45: 1363-1368.
    • 34. Ryan M, Elashi M, Newsham-West R, Taunton J (2014) Examining injury risk and pain perception in runners using minimalist footwear. Br J Sports Med 48: 1257-1262.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article