Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Pesce, Giovanni; Morgan, Deborah; Odgers, David; Henry, Alison; Allen, Mollie; Ball, Richard (2013)
Publisher: Institution of Civil Engineers
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: H200
Limestone sourced from Salisbury Cathedral and Bath Abbey (UK) was treated with commercially available nanolime of concentration 25 g/l. The response of the stones to the treatment was studied using a variety of analysis techniques including optical microscopy, electron microscopy, drilling resistance measurement and mercury intrusion porosimetry. Weathered and non-weathered surfaces of both types of stones were compared. All the specimens were characterised before and after the treatment to determine any changes in their properties caused by their weathering and by the treatment itself. Results show that the degradation processes of the stones strongly affect their interaction with nanolime consolidation treatments. Drilling resistance measurements of treated and untreated samples were compared. After 20 days significant increases in sub-surface drilling resistance was observed in the non-weathered Bath stone and a small increase in the weathered Bath stone after 6 months was also noted. Both weathered and non-weathered Chilmark stone showed an increase in drilling resistance after 6 months, however at 20 days this was most evident in the samples treated with nanolime in isopropanol as opposed to ethanol.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • ASTM (2009) D 3359: Standard test methods for measuring the adhesion by tape test. Book of Standards, Volume 06?01. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
    • Daniele V and Taglieri G (2010) Nanolime suspension applied on natural lithotypes: the influence of concentration and residual water content on carbonation process and on treatment effectiveness. Journal of Cultural Heritage 11(1): 102-106.
    • Dei L and Salvadori B (2006) Nanotechnology in cultural heritage conservation: nanometric slaked lime saves architectonic and artistic surface from decay. Journal of Cultural Heritage 7(2): 110-115.
    • Dheilly RM, Tudo J, Sebaibi Y and Queneudec M (2002) Influence of storage conditions on the carbonation of powdered Ca(OH)2. Construction and Building Materials 16(3): 155- 161.
    • El-Turki A, Ball RJ and Allen GC (2007) The influence of relative humidity on structural and chemical changes during carbonation of hydraulic lime. Cement and Concrete Research 37(8): 1233-1240.
    • El-Turki A, Ball RJ, Holmes S, Allen WJ and Allen GC (2010) Environmental cycling and laboratory testing to evaluate the significance of moisture control for lime mortars. Construction and Building Materials 24(8): 1392-1397.
    • Ferreira Pinto A and Delgado Rodrigues J (2012) Consolidation of carbonate stone: influence of treatment procedures on the strengthening action of consolidants. Journal of Cultural Heritage 13(2): 154-166.
    • Gauri KL and Bandyopadhyay JK (1999) Carbonate Stone: Chemical Behaviour, Durability, and Conservation. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
    • Geddes I (2003) Hidden Depths. Wiltshire's Geology and Landscape. Libris Press, Bradford-on-Avon, UK.
    • Giorgi R, Dei L and Baglioni P (2000) A new method for consolidating wall paintings based on dispersion of lime in alcohol. Studies in Conservation 45(3): 154-161.
    • IBZ-Freiberg (n.d.) CaLoSiL - Colloidal Nano-particles of Lime for Stone and Plaster Consolidation. IBZ-Freiberg, Freiberg, Germany. See http://www.ibz-freiberg.de/ download/pdf/nanomaterialien/CaLoSiL_EN.pdf (accessed 05/05/2013).
    • Karatasios I, Theoulakis P, Kalagri A, Sapalidis A and Kilikoglou V (2009) Evaluation of consolidation treatments of marly limestone used in archaeological monuments. Construction and Building Materials 23(8): 2803-2812.
    • Lopez-Arce P, Gomez-Villalba LS, Pinho L et al. (2010) Influence of porosity and relative humidity on consolidation of dolostone with calcium hydroxide nanoparticles: effectiveness assessment with non-destructive techniques. Materials Characterization 61(2): 168-184.
    • Lopez-Arce P, Gomez-Villalba LS, Martı´nez-Ramı´rez S, A´ lvarez de Buergo M and Fort R (2011) Influence of relative humidity on the carbonation of calcium hydrozide nanoparticles and the formation of calcium carbonate particles. Powder Technology 205(1-3): 263-269.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

Cite this article