Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Gray, D.; Mercer, C.; Graham, A.; Salisbury, C.; The One-Stop Shop Project Team (2009)
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Languages: English
Types: Article
Aim: To compare patterns of population service use and preference in areas with and without one-stop shop services. \ud Background: A number of strategy documents have\ud recommended adopting a more integrated approach to sexual health service provision.One proposed model of integration is one-stop shops, where services for contraception\ud and sexually transmitted infections are provided under the same roof. Currently, the potential impact of one-stop shop services on patient service use and preference is unclear, particularly at a population level. \ud Method: Three different models of one-stop shop were studied: a dedicated young persons’ service, a specialist mainstream service,and an enhanced general practice. In each model, the one-stop shop site was matched to two control sites with traditional service provision. Random samples of male and female patients were selected from general practices close to either the one-stop shop or control sites. These patients received a postal survey asking about their use or preference for services for six sexual health needs. One-stop shop and control samples were compared using multivariate logistic regression. \ud Findings: Of the 14 387 patients surveyed, 3101 (21.6%) responded. In the young persons’ model, few significant differences were found in service use or preference between those living in one-stop shop and control site areas.\ud In the specialist servicesmodel, women in the one-stop shop area were significantly more likely to cite specialist services for emergency contraception and abortion advice, when compared to those served by non-integrated control services. In the general practice model, respondents in the one-stop shop area were significantly more likely to cite\ud general practice for all six sexual health needs. Overall, general practice was the preferred service provider cited for all sexual health needs, except condoms and pregnancy tests.These findings are discussed in terms of their implications for the provision of integrated\ud sexual health services. In addition, key methodological issues and future research possibilities are identified.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bates, S.M. and Rogstad, K.E. 2000: Postal research: too many problems? Sexually Transmitted Infections 76, 332-34.
    • Bloxham, S., Capstick, S. and Greenwood, A. 1999: Combining GUM and contraceptive services for young people: profile of an innovative clinic. British Journal of Family Planning 25, 18-21.
    • Cassell, J. 2006: Estimating STI morbidity in primary care. British Medical Journal 82, 67-71.
    • Cassell, J., Mercer, C.M., Sutcliffe, L. et al. 2006a: Trends in sexually transmitted infections in general practice 1990-2000: population based study using data from the UK general practice research database. British Medical Journal 332, 332-34.
    • Cassell, J., Mercer, C.M. and Fenton, K.A. 2006b: A comparison of population diagnosed with Chlamydia in primary care with that diagnosed in sexual health clinics, and its implications for a national screening programme. Public Health 120, 984-88.
    • Cates, W. Jr and Stone, K. 1992: Family planning, sexually transmitted diseases and contraceptive choice: a literature update - Part 1. Family Planning Perspectives 24, 75-84.
    • Dawson, S.G., Callander, N., Roche, C., Kingsland, T. and Desmond, N. 2000: Integrated sexual healthcare: the development and review of one model of service delivery. International Journal of STD and AIDS 1, 428-34.
    • Department of Health. 2001: The national strategy for sexual health and HIV. London, UK: HMSO.
    • Department of Health. 2004: Making healthier choices easier. London, UK: HMSO.
    • Edwards, P., Roberts, I., Clarke, M. et al. 2002: Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. British Medical Journal 324, 1183-92.
    • Fenton, K.A., Korovessis, C., Johnson, A.M. et al. 2001a: Sexual behaviour in Britain: reported sexually transmitted infections and prevalent genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Lancet 352, 1851-54.
    • Fenton, K.A., Johnson, A.M., McManus, S. and Erens, S. 2001b: Measuring sexual behaviour: methodological challenges in survey research. Sexually Transmitted Infections 77, 84-92.
    • Fenton, K.A., Mercer, C.H., Johnson, A.M. et al. 2005: Reported sexually transmitted disease clinic attendance and sexually transmitted infections in Britain: prevalence, risk factors and proportionate population burden. Journal of Infectious Diseases 191 (Suppl 1), S127-98.
    • French, R.S., Coope, C.M., Graham, A. et al. 2006: One-stop shop versus collaborative integration: what is the best way of delivering sexual health services? Sexually Transmitted Infections 82, 202-06.
    • French, R.S., Mercer, C.H., Kane, R. et al. 2007: What impact has England's Teenage Pregnancy Strategy had on young people's knowledge of and access to health services for contraceptive advice and supplies? Findings from the Teenage Pregnancy Strategy Evaluation. Journal of Adolescent Health 41, 594-601.
    • French, R.S., Mercer, C.H., Johnson, A.M. et al. 2009: Use of contraceptive services in Britain: Findings from the second National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles. The Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care 35, 9-14.
    • Hardee, K. and Yount, K.M. 1995: From rhetoric to reality: delivering reproductive health promises through integrated services. USA: Family Health International Working Paper Series.
    • Hardon, A. 2003: Reproductive health care in the Netherlands: would integration improve it? Reproductive Health Matters 11, 59-73.
    • Health Protection Agency. 2005: Mapping the issues: HIV and other sexually transmitted infections in the United Kingdom. London, UK: HPA.
    • Health Protection Agency. 2007: Testing Times: HIV and other Sexually Transmitted Infections in the United Kingdom. London, UK: HPA.
    • Johnson, A.M., Wadsworth, J., Wellings, K. et al. 1994: Sexual attitudes and lifestyles. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Press.
    • Johnson, A.M., Mercer, C., Erens, B. et al. 2001: Sexual behaviour in Britain: partnerships, practices and HIV risk behaviours. Lancet 358, 1835-41.
    • Jones, M. 1996: Clients express preference for one-stop sexual health shop. Nursing Times 96, 32-33.
    • Kane, R. and Wellings, K. 1999: Integrated sexual health services: the views of medical professionals. Culture, Health and Sexuality 1, 131-45.
    • Macleod, J., Rowsell, R., Horner, P. et al. 1999: Postal urine specimens: are they a feasible method for genital chlamydial infection screening. British Journal of General Practice 49, 455-58.
    • Macleod, J., Salisbury, C., Low, N. et al. 2005: Coverage and uptake of systematic postal screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis and prevalence of infection in the United Kingdom general population: cross sectional study. British Medical Journal 330, 940-44.
    • National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyle. 2000: Johnson, A., Fenton, K., Copas, A. et al.
    • Nichol, A., Catchpole, M., Cliffe, S. et al. 1999: Sexual health of teenagers in England and Wales: National Centre for Social Research. Analysis of national data. British Medical Journal 318, 1321-22.
    • One-Stop Shop Evaluation Team. 2007: Evaluation of One-Stop Shop Models of Sexual Health Provision. Retrieved 13 March 2009 from http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsand statistics/Publications/PublicationsStatistics/DH_083200.
    • O'Sullivan, I., Keyse, L., Park, N., Diaper, A. and Short, S. 2005: Contraception and sexual health, 2004/05. London, UK: HMSO.
    • Schierhout, G. and Hardon, A. 1999: The integration of primary health care services: A systematic literature review. Durban: Health Systems Trust.
    • Social Exclusion Unit. 1999: Teenage Pregnancy. London, UK: Stationery Office.
    • Walsh, J. 1996: Family planning provision in genitourinary medicine: a quiet revolution. British Journal of Family Planning 22, 27-30.
    • Ward, H., Kubba, A., Bradbeer, C. et al. 1995: Consensus workshop on sexually transmitted diseases and contraception: sexual health promotion and service delivery. Faculty of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, Faculty of Public Health Medicine: MSSVD.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article