Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Chaudhary, Sarah; Avis, Mark; Munn-Giddings, Carol (2013)
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan
Journal: Social Theory & Health
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: health citizenship, Original Article, public sphere, Sociology and Political Science, Health(social science), self-help group, Habermas
Abstract\ud \ud Self-help groups in the United Kingdom continue to grow in number and address virtually every conceivable health condition, but they remain the subject of very little theoretical analysis. The literature to date has predominantly focused on their therapeutic effects on individual members. And yet they are widely presumed to fulfil a broader civic role and to encourage democratic citizenship. The article uses Habermas’ model of the public sphere as an analytical tool with which to reconsider the literature on self-help groups in order to increase our knowledge of their civic functions. In doing this it also aims to illustrate the continuing relevance of Habermas’ work to our understanding of issues in health and social care. We consider, within the context of current health policies and practices, the extent to which self-help groups with a range of different forms and functions operate according to the principles of communicative rationality that Habermas deemed key to democratic legitimacy. We conclude that self-help groups’ civic role is more complex than is usually presumed and that various factors including groups’ leadership, organisational structure and links with public agencies can affect their efficacy within the public sphere.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Ablon, J. (1981) Dwarfism and social identity: Self help group participation. Social Science & Medicine 15B(1): 25-30.
    • Adamsen, L. and Rasmussen, M. (2001) Sociological perspectives on self help groups: Reflections on conceptualisation and social processes. Journal of Advanced Nursing 35(6): 909-917.
    • Alexander, J. (2006) The Civil Sphere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Anheier, H. (2004) Civil Society: Measurement, Evaluation, Policy. London: Earthscan Publications.
    • Baldacchino, A. and Hussein Rassool, G. (2006) The self help movement in the addiction field - Revisited. Journal of Addictions Nursing 17(1): 47-52.
    • Barker, K. (2002) Self help literature and the making of an illness identity: The case of Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FMS). Social Problems 49(3): 279-300.
    • Barker, K. (2008) Electronic support groups, patient-consumers, and medicalization: The case of contested illness. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour 49(1): 20-36.
    • Bauman, Z. (1999) In Search of Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    • Ben-Ari, A. (1998) Understanding of and attitudes towards self help: Views from Palestinian and Israeli self help groups. Journal of Social Service Research 24(1-2): 131-148.
    • Benhabib, S. (1992) Models of public space: Hannah Arendt, the liberal tradition and Jurgen Habermas. In: C. Calhoun (ed.) Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    • Bond, J. (1992) The medicalization of dementia. Journal of Aging Studies 6(4): 397-403.
    • Borkman, T. (1999) Understanding Self Help/Mutual Aid: Experiential Learning in the Commons. New Jersey: Rutgers.
    • Borkman, T. and Munn-Giddings, C. (2008) Self help groups challenge health care systems in the US and UK. In: S. Chambre and M. Goldner (eds.) Patients, Consumers and Civil Society. Advances in Medical Sociology, Vol. 10, London: Emerald, pp. 127-150.
    • Brown, P., Zavestoski, S., McCormick, S., Mayer, B., Morello-Frosch, R. and Gasior Altman, R. (2004) Embodied health movements: New approaches to social movements in health. Sociology of Health & Illness 26(1): 50-80.
    • Buchanan, I. and Walmsley, J. (2006) Self advocacy in historical perspective. British Journal of Learning Disability 34(3): 133-138.
    • Cameron, D. (2010) Our Big Society Agenda. Speech. Liverpool, 19 July 2010, www.conservatives .com/news/speeches/2010/07/David_Cameron_Our_Big_Society_Agenda.aspx, accessed 31 August 2010.
    • Chamak, B. (2008) Autism and social movements: French parents' associations and individual autistic organisations. Sociology of Health & Illness 30(1): 76-96.
    • Chaudhary, S., Avis, M. and Munn-Giddings, C. (2010) The lifespan and life-cycle of self help groups: A retrospective study of groups in Nottingham, UK. Health and Social Care in the Community 18(4): 346-354.
    • Conrad, P. (2007) The Medicalization of Society. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
    • Conrad, P. and Schneider, J. (1992) Deviance and Medicalization: From Badness to Sickness. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
    • Dahlgren, P. (2002) In search of the talkative public: Media, deliberative democracy and civic culture. Javnost - The Public 9(3): 5-26.
    • Daly, S. and Howell, J. (2006) For the Common Good: The Changing Role of Civil Society in UK and Ireland, Democracy and Civil Society Series. London: Carnegie Trust.
    • Damen, S., van Hove, E. and Mortelmans, D. (2000) Self help groups in Belgium: Their place in the care network. Sociology of Health & Illness 22(3): 331-348.
    • Dickerson, F. (1998) Strategies that foster empowerment. Cognitive and Behavioural Practice 5(2): 255-275.
    • DoH. (2006a) Our Health, Our Care, Our Say - A New Direction for Community Services. London: HMSO.
    • DoH. (2006b) A Stronger Local Voice: A Framework for Creating a Stronger Local Voice in the Development of Health and Social Care Services. London: HMSO.
    • Dunne, E. and Fitzpatrick, A. (1999) The views of professionals on the role of self help groups in the mental health area. Irish Journal of Psychiatric Medicine 16(3): 84-89.
    • Edwards, G. (2004) Habermas and social movements: What's new? In: N. Crossley and J. Roberts (eds.) After Habermas: New Perspectives on the Public Sphere. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Elsdon, K., Reynolds, J. and Stewart, S. (2000) Sharing Experience, Living and Learning: A Study of Self Help Groups. London: Community Matters.
    • Emerick, R. (1991) The politics of psychiatric self help: Political factions, interactional support and group longevity in a social movement. Social Science & Medicine 32(10): 1121-1128.
    • Fyfe, N. and Milligan, C. (2003) Space, citizenship, and volunteerism: Critical reflections on the voluntary welfare sector in Glasgow. Environment and Planning A35(11): 2069-2086.
    • Gardiner, M. (2004) Wild publics and grotesque symposiums: Habermas and Bakhtin on dialogue, everyday life and the public sphere. In: N. Crossley and J. Roberts (eds.) After Habermas: New Perspectives on the Public Sphere. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Garrett, P. (2009) Questioning Habermasian social work: A note on some alternative theoretical resources. British Journal of Social Work 39(5): 867-883.
    • Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    • Giddens, A. (1998) The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    • Godin, P., Davies, J., Heyman, B., Reynolds, L., Simpson, A. and Floyd, M. (2007) Opening communicative space: A Habermasian understanding of a user-led participatory research project. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology 18(4): 452-469.
    • Goldstrom, I. et al (2006) National estimates for mental health mutual support groups, self help organizations, and consumer operated services. Administration and policy in Mental Health Services Research 33(1): 92-103.
    • Goode, L. (2005) Jurgen Habermas, Democracy and the Public Sphere. London: Pluto Press.
    • Graham, T. (2008) Needles in a haystack: A new approach for identifying and assessing political talk in non-political discussion forums Javnost - The Public 15(2): 17-36.
    • Habermas, J. (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalisation of Society. Boston, MA: Beacon.
    • Habermas, J. (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    • Habermas, J. (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
    • Hatzidimitriadou, E. (2002) Political ideology, helping mechanisms and empowerment of mental health self help/mutual aid groups. Journal of Community and Applied Psychology 12(4): 271-285.
    • Hayes, D. and Houston, S. (2007) 'Lifeworld', 'System', and family group conferences: Habermas' contribution to discourse in child protection. British Journal of Social Work 37(6): 987-1006.
    • Hedley, R. and Davis-Smith, J. (1992) Volunteering and Society: Principles and Practice. London: NCVO.
    • Hodge, S. (2005) Competence, identity and intersubjectivity: Applying Habermas's theory of communicative action to service user involvement in mental health policy making. Social Theory & Health 3(3): 165-182.
    • Houston, S. (2002) Re-thinking a systemic approach to child welfare: A critical response to the framework for the assessment of children in need and their families. European Journal of Social Work 5(3): 301-312.
    • Jacobs, M. and Goodman, G. (1989) Psychology and self help groups: Predictions on a partnership. American Psychologist 44(3): 536-545.
    • Karlsson, M., Jeppsson, G.E. and Hansson, J. (2002) Self help groups in the welfare state: Treatment program or voluntary action? Non-profit Management and Leadership 13(2): 155-167.
    • Karppinen, K., Hallvard, M. and Svensson, J. (2008) Habermas, Mouffe and political communication: A case for theoretical eclecticism. Javnost - The Public 15(3): 5-22.
    • Katz, A. (2003) Fellowship, helping and healing: The re-emergence of self help groups. International Journal of Self Help and Self Care 2(1): 21-33.
    • Kelleher, D. (2001) New social movements in the health domain. In: G. Scambler (ed.) Habermas, Critical Theory and Health. London: Routledge.
    • Landes, J. (1995) The public and the private sphere: A feminist reconsideration. In: J. Meehan (ed.) Feminists Read Habermas: Gendering the Subject of Discourse. London: Routledge.
    • Landzelius, K. (2006) Patient organization movements and new metamorphoses in health. Social Science & Medicine 62(3): 529-537.
    • Lieberman, M. and Snowden, L. (1999) Problems in assessing prevalence and membership characteristics of self help group participants. Journal of Applied Behavioural Science 29(2): 166-180.
    • Marcello, M. and Perrucci, R. (2000) Small groups and civic engagement - All about me? The Communitarian Network 10(3), http://www.gwu.edu/Bccps/rcp/rcq_smallgroups.html, accessed 21 September 2012.
    • McKee, A. (2005) The Public Sphere: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • McLean, A. (1995) Empowerment and the psychiatric consumer/ex-patient movement in the United States: Contradictions, crisis and change. Social Science & Medicine 40(8): 1053-1071.
    • Medvene, L. (1985) An organisational theory of self help groups. Social Policy 15(3): 35-37.
    • Melucci, A. (1989) Nomads of the Present. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
    • Munn-Giddings, C. (2003) Mutuality and Movement: An Exploration of the Relationship of Self Help/ Mutual Aid to Social Policy. Loughborough, UK: Loughborough University.
    • Munn-Giddings, C. and McVicar, A. (2006) Self help groups as mutual support: What do carers value? Health and Social Care in the Community 15(1): 26-34.
    • Nash, V. and Paxton, W. (2002) Any Volunteers for the Good Society. London: IPPR.
    • New Economics Foundation. (2010) Ten Big Questions about the Big Society and Ten Ways to Make the Best of It. London: NEF.
    • Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. (2005) New Localism - Citizen Engagement, Neighbourhoods and Public Services. London: HMSO.
    • Ontario Health Promotion Bulletin 399. (2005) Frameworks and Skills for Keeping Self Help Networks on Track. Ontario: Ontario Self Help Resource Centre.
    • Radin, P. (2006) 'To me, it's my life': Medical communication, trust and activism in cyberspace. Social Science & Medicine 62(3): 591-601.
    • Rappaport, J. (1994) Narrative studies, personal stories, and identity transformation in the mutual help context. In: T. Powell (ed.) Understanding the Self help Organisation. California: Sage.
    • Rootes, L. and Aanes, D. (1992) A conceptual framework for understanding self help groups. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 43(4): 379-381.
    • Rosencrance, J. (1985) Compulsive gambling and the medicalization of deviance. Social Problems 32(3): 275-284.
    • Scambler, G. (ed.) (1987) Habermas and the power of medical expertise. In: Sociological Theory and Medical Sociology. London: Tavistock.
    • Scambler, G. (1998) Modernity, Medicine and Health: Medical Sociology Towards 2000. Florence, KY: Routledge.
    • Scambler, G. and Kelleher, D. (2006) New social and health movements: Issues of representation and change. Critical Public Health 16(3): 219-231.
    • Steinke, B. (2000) Rehabilitation initiatives by disability self help groups: A comparative study. International Social Security Review 53(1): 83-107.
    • Stewart, M. (1990) Professional interface with mutual aid self help groups: A review. Social Science & Medicine 31(10): 1143-1158.
    • Stolze, T. (2000) A displaced transition: Habermas on the public sphere. In: M. Hill and W. Montag (eds.) Masses, Classes and the Public Sphere. London: Verso.
    • Whelan, R. (1999) Involuntary Action: How Voluntary is the 'Voluntary' Sector?. London: IEA.
    • Williams, F. (2004) Care, values and support in local self help groups. Social Policy and Society 3(4): 431-438.
    • Williams, G. (1989) Hope for the humblest? The role of self help in chronic illness: The case of ankylosing spondylitis. Sociology of Health & Illness 11(2): 135-159.
    • Williams, G. and Popay, J. (2001) Lay health knowledge and the concept of the lifeworld. In: G. Scambler (ed.) Habermas, Critical Theory and Health. London: Routledge.
    • Wilson, J. (1994) Self Help Groups and Professionals. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Social Care Research 60.
    • Wong, D.K.P. and Chow, S.F. (2005) Beyond clinical trials and narratives: A participatory action research with cancer patient self help groups. Patient Education and Counselling 60(2): 201-205.
    • Zoller, H. (2005) Health activism: Communication theory and action for social change. Communication Theory 15(4): 341-364.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article