LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Callan, Mitch J.; Ferguson, Heather J.; Bindemann, Markus (2013)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: B
When confronted with bad things happening to good people, observers often engage reactive strategies, such as victim derogation, to maintain a belief in a just world. Although such reasoning is usually made retrospectively, we investigated the extent to which knowledge of another person’s good or bad behavior can also bias people’s online expectations for subsequent good or bad outcomes. Using a fully-crossed design, participants listened to auditory scenarios that varied in terms of whether the characters engaged in morally good or bad behavior while their eye movements were tracked around concurrent visual scenes depicting good and bad outcomes. We found that the good (bad) behavior of the characters influenced gaze preferences for good (bad) outcomes just prior to the actual outcomes being revealed. These findings suggest that beliefs about a person’s moral worth encourage observers to foresee a preferred deserved outcome as the event unfolds. We include evidence to show that this effect cannot be explained in terms of affective priming or matching strategies.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Baumeister, R.F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K.D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323-370.
    • Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123-152.
    • Callan, M. J., & Ellard, J. H. (2010). Beyond victim derogation and blame: Just world dynamics in everyday life. In D. R. Bobocel, A. C. Kay, M. P. Zanna, & J. M. Olson (Eds.). The psychology of justice and legitimacy: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 11, pp. 53-77). New York: Psychology Press.
    • Callan, M. J., Kay, A. C., Davidenko, N., & Ellard, J. H. (2009). The effects of justice motivation on memory for self- and other-relevant events. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 614-623.
    • Callan, M. J., Sutton, M. R., & Dovale, C. (2010). When deserving translates into causing: The effect of cognitive load on immanent justice reasoning. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
    • Cooper, R. M. (1974). The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 84-107.
    • Edwards, R. (2009, March 31). Lotto rapist forced to pay compensation to victim. Telgraph.co.uk. Retrieved from: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/5083002/ Lotto-rapist-forced-to-pay-compensation-to-victim.html
    • Ferguson, H. J., & Breheny, R. (2012). Listeners' eyes reveal spontaneous sensitivity to others' perspectives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 257-263.
    • Ferguson, H. J. & Breheny, R. (2011). Eye movements reveal the time-course of anticipating behaviour based on complex, conflicting desires. Cognition, 119, 179-196.
    • Ferguson, H. J., & Sanford, A. J. (2008). Anomalies in real and counterfactual worlds: An eye movement investigation. Journal of Memory & Language, 58, 609-626.
    • Ferguson, H. J., Scheepers, C., & Sanford, A. J. (2010). Expectations in counterfactual and theory of mind reasoning. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 297-346.
    • Filik, R. (2008). Contextual override of pragmatic anomalies: Evidence from eye movements. Cognition, 106, 1038-1046.
    • Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (2008). Social cognition: From brains to culture. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    • Gaucher, D., Hafer, C. L., Kay, A. C., & Davidenko, N. (2010). Compensatory rationalizations and the resolution of everyday undeserved outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 109-118.
    • Hafer, C. L. & Bègue, L. (2005). Experimental research on just world theory: Problems, developments, and future challenges. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 128-166.
    • Hafer, C. L., & Gosse, L. (2010). Preserving the belief in a just world: When and for whom are different strategies preferred? In D. R. Bobocel, A. C. Kay, M. P. Zanna, & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The psychology of justice and legitimacy: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 11, pp. 79-102). New York: Psychology Press.
    • Yao, J.G., Gao, X., Yan, H.M., & Li, C.Y. (2011). Field of Attention for Instantaneous Object Recognition. PLOS ONE, 6, e16343.
    • Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T. M., & Haywood, S. L. (2003). The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 133-159.
    • Lerner, M. J. (1977). The justice motive. Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45, 1-32.
    • Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum.
    • Lerner, M. J. (1998). The two forms of the belief in a just world: Some thoughts on why and how people care about justice. In M. J. Lerner & L. Montada (Eds.). Responses to victimizations and belief in a just world, (pp. 246-269). New York: Plenum Press.
    • Lerner, M. J., & Clayton, S. (2011). Justice and self-interest: Two fundamental motives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Lerner, M. J. & Simmons, C. H. (1966). Observers reaction to the 'innocent victim': Compassion or rejection? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 203-210.
    • Naber, M., Hilger, M., & Einhäuser, W. (2012). Animal detection and identification in natural scenes: Image statistics and emotional valence. Journal of Vision, 12, 25.
    • Nieuwland, M. S., & Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2006). When peanuts fall in love: N400 evidence for the power of discourse. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1098-1111.
    • Pflanz, M. (2011, July 14). The forgotten people of Africa's famine cry out for aid. Telegraph.co.uk. Retrieved from: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/ africaandindianocean/ethiopia/8637978/The-forgotten-people-of-Africas-famine-cryout-for-aid.html
    • Potter, M. C., & Levy, E. L. (1969). Recognition memory for a rapid sequence of pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 10-15.
    • Ryan, W. (1971). Blaming the victim. London: Orbach & Chambers.
    • Taylor, S. E., & Crocker, J. (1981). Schematic bases of social information processing. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 1, pp. 89-134). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    • 0-500ms Good context- Good outcome Good context- Bad outcome Bad context- Good outcome Bad context- Bad outcome
    • 500-1000ms Good context- Good outcome Good context- Bad outcome Bad context- Good outcome Bad context- Bad outcome
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article