LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Mir, R.; Banerjee, S. B.; Miri, A. (2008)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Z665, HD
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to discuss the phenomenon of knowledge transfer within multinational corporations (MNCs), and how the imperatives of thought and action that constitute new knowledge are received in the terrain that constitutes the MNC subsidiary. \ud \ud Design/methodology/approach - This study employs an ethnographic approach, and juxtaposes primary data collection with a variety of secondary data sources. \ud \ud Findings - The data are analyzed in light of the theoretical construct of hegemony, and three themes theorized that underlie the process of knowledge transfer. These include knowledge loss at the local level, the coercive practices that ensure knowledge transfer, and the invocation of imperial subjectivities by the headquarters of the MNC when dealing with subsidiaries from poorer nations. \ud \ud Originality/value - This paper goes beyond the mainstream approaches into organizational knowledge transfer, by analyzing these issues in light of political economy, and the changing landscape of industrial accumulation. It offers in some measure, the building blocks of a different organizational theory, one that is sensitive to those subjects who are consigned to the periphery of mainstream organizing.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Almeida, P. & Phene, A. (2004). 'Subsidiaries and knowledge creation: The influence of the MNC and host country innovation'. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 847-864.
    • Alvesson, M. & Kärreman, D. (2001). 'Odd couple: Making sense of the curious concept of knowledge management'. Journal of Management Studies, 38, 7, 996-1018.
    • Banerjee, S.B. (2000). 'Whose land is it anyway? National interest, indigenous stakeholders and colonial discourses: The case of the Jabiluka uranium mine'. Organization & Environment, 13, 1, 3-38.
    • Barley, S. R. (1996). 'Technicians in the workplace: Ethnographic evidence for bringing work into organization studies'. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41:404-441.
    • Bate, S. (1997). 'Whatever happened to organizational anthropology?' Human Relations, 50: 1147-1175.
    • Becker, M.C. (2001). 'Managing dispersed knowledge: Organizational problems, managerial strategies and their effectiveness.” Journal of Management Studies, 38, 7, 1037-1051.
    • Brown, J.S. & Duguid, P. (1998). 'Organizing knowledge'. California Management Review, 40, 3, 90-111.
    • Brown, J.S. & Duguid, P. (2001). 'Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective'. Organization Science, 12, 2, 198-213.
    • Chandrasekhar, C.P. & Ghosh, J. (2002). The Market that Failed: A Decade of Neoliberal Economic Reforms in India. New Delhi: Leftword Books.
    • Coff, R., Coff, D. & Eastvold, D. (2006). The knowledge-leveraging paradox: How to achieve scale without making knowledge imitable. Academy of Management Review, 31(2): 452- 465.
    • Contu, A. & Willmott, H. (2003). 'Re-embedding situatedness: The importance of power relations in learning theory'. Organization Science, 14, 3, 283-296.
    • Cooke, B (2003). 'Managing organizational culture and imperialism. In Prasad, A. (Ed.), Postcolonial theory and organizational analysis: A critical engagement. New York: Palgrave, Macmillan, 75-94.
    • Davenport, T. H. & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage what they Know. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article