Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Sullivan-Taylor, Bridgette; Branicki, Layla (2011)
Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd.
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: HD28
This article is a first step towards addressing a gap in the field of organisational resilience research by examining how small and medium enterprises (SME) manage the threat and actuality of extreme events. Pilot research found that the managerial framing of extreme events varied by a range of organisational factors. This finding informed further examination of the contextual nature of the resilience concept. To date, large organisations have been the traditional focus of empirical work and theorising in this area; yet the heterogeneous SME sector makes up approximately 99% of UK industry and routinely operates under conditions of uncertainty. In a comparative study examining UK organisational resilience, it emerged that SME participants had both a distinctive perspective and approach to resilience when compared to participants from larger organisations. This article presents a subset of data from 11 SME decision-makers. The relationship between resilience capabilities, such as flexibility and adaptation, is interrogated in relation to organisational size. The data suggest limitations of applying a one-size-fits-all organisation solution (managerial or policy) to creating resilience. This study forms the basis for survey work examining the extent to which resilience is an organisationally contingent concept in practice.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Aldrich, H.E. (1979). Organisations and Environments. Prentice-Hall: New York.
    • BIS (2009) Statistical Press Release URN 09/92 14.10.09. Accessed: December 2009. Accessible: http://stats.berr.gov.uk/ed/sme/smestats2008-ukspr.pdf Barney, J. B. (1995). Looking inside for competitive advantage, Academy of Management Executive, 9(4), 48-61.
    • Bolton, J. E. (1971). Small Firms: Report of the Committee of Inquiry on Small Firms. Cmnd 4811.HMSO: London.
    • Civil Contingencies Act (2004). Accessed: December 2009. Accessible: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2004/ukpga_20040036_en_1 Coaffe, J. and Rogers, P. (2008). 'Rebordering the City for New Security Challenges: From Counter-terrorism to Community Resilience', Space and Polity, 12(1), 101-118.
    • Cornish, P. (2005). Civil Defence and Public Resilience: the Homeland Security of the United Kingdom. In, K. von Hippel (Ed.), Europe Confronts Terror. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Cummings, S. and Wilson, D. (2003). Images of Strategy, Blackwell: Oxford.
    • de Vries, H. and Shields, M. (2006). Towards a Theory of Entrepreneurial Resilience: An Analysis of New Zealand SME Owner-Operators. The New Zealand Journal of Applied Business. 5, (1), 33- 44.
    • Eisenhardt, K.M. (1999). Strategy as Strategic Decision Making, Sloan Management Review, 40, (3),65.
    • Gephart, Robert P. Jr. (1984). Making Sense of Organisational Succession: An Ethnomethodological Approach. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 553-581.
    • Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L. (1968). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Aldine: Chicago.
    • Hamel, G. and Valikangas, L. (2003). The quest for resilience, Harvard Business Review, September, 52-63.
    • Helfat C.E. and Lieberman, M.B. (2002). The birth of capabilities: market entry and the importance of pre-history. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, (4), 725-760.
    • Herbane, B. (2010). Small Business Research: Time for a Crisis-Based View. International Small Business Journal. 28, (1), 43-64.
    • Ingirige, B & Proverbs, D. and Jones, K.G. (2008). 'Investigating SME Resilience and their Adaptive Capacities to Extreme Weather Events: A Literature Review and Synthesis', CIB W89, Building Education and Research (BEAR), Sri Lanka.
    • Kirchhoff, B.A. (1994). Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capitalism: The Economics of Business Firm Formation and Growth. Praeger Press: Westport: CT.
    • McGee, Thomas and Wilson (2005). Strategy: Analysis and Practice. McGraw-Hill Education: Berkshire.
    • Meyer, A.D. (1982). Adapting to Environmental Jolts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 515- 537.
    • Peck, H. (July 2006). Resilience in the Food Chain: A Study of Business Continuity Management in the Food and Drink Industry. Final Report to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Accessed: December 2009. Accessible: http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Document.aspx?Document=FT0352_4705_FRP.doc Penrose, E.T. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford University Press: New York.
    • Perrow, C. (1984). Normal Accidents: Living With High-Risk Technologies. Basic Books: New York.
    • Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. (1978). The External Control of Organisations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper & Row: New York.
    • Rice, J. B. and Caniato, F. (2003). Building a Secure and Resilient Supply Network. Supply Chain Management Review, 7, (5), 22-30 Roberts, K. (1990). Some Characteristics of One Type of High Reliability Organisation.
    • Organisation Science, 1, 160-176.
    • Robbins, D.K., Pantuosco, L.J., Parker, D.F. and Fuller, B.K. (2000). An Empirical Assessment of the Contribution of Small Business Employment to US State Economic Performance. Small Business Economics, 1, (4), 239-302.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article