Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Moore, G.; Tapper, K.; Moore, L.; Murphy, S. (2008)
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: R, BF

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: food and beverages, digestive, oral, and skin physiology
Background\ud Measuring children's dietary behavior is central to evaluating interventions and identifying predictors and outcomes of dietary behaviors. Systematic biases may obscure or inflate associations with self-reported intakes.\ud \ud Objective\ud To identify cognitive, behavioral, and social correlates of bias in children's reporting of breakfast items on a self-completion questionnaire.\ud \ud Design\ud Cross-sectional survey. Children completed standardized tests of episodic memory, working memory, and attention, and a questionnaire assessing attitudes toward breakfast. Teachers completed a classroom behavior measure. Associations between measures and children's underreporting of breakfast foods (ie, cereals, bread, milk, fruits, sweet items, and potato chips) on a self-completion questionnaire relative to validated 24-hour recall were examined.\ud \ud Subjects and setting\ud Subjects were aged 9 to 11 years (n=678). Data were collected from 111 schools throughout Wales in 2005.\ud \ud Results\ud A larger percentage of less-healthful breakfast items (ie, sweet snacks and potato chips) than more healthful items (ie, fruit, cereals, bread, and milk) were omitted from questionnaire self-reports. Children from lower socioeconomic status schools omitted more items than those from wealthier schools (Kruskal-Wallis H=12.51, P<0.01), with omissions twice as high for less-healthful items than for more-healthful items within the lowest socioeconomic status schools. Those with positive attitudes (H=23.85, P<0.001), better classroom behavior (H=6.26, P<0.05), and better episodic memory (H=8.42, P<0.05) omitted fewer items than those with negative attitudes, poorer behavior, and poorer episodic memory. Children who ate more items omitted more than those who ate fewer (H=47.65, P<0.001). No differences were observed in terms of attention and working memory.\ud \ud Conclusions\ud Episodic memory, classroom behavior, attitudes, socioeconomic status, and total items consumed are associated with bias in questionnaire self reports. Such biases have implications for examination of associations between breakfast eating and cognitive and behavioral factors, examination of effect modification by socioeconomic status in intervention trials, and for the sensitivity of measures to detect intervention effects.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Blum JW, Jacobsen DJ, Donnelly JE. Beverage consumption patterns in elementary school aged children across a two-year period. J Am Coll Nutr. 2005;24:93-98.
    • 2. Lytle LA, Nichaman MZ, Obarzanek E, Glovsky, E, Montgomery, D, Nicklas, T, Zive, M, Feldman, H. Validation of 24-hour recalls assisted by food records in 3rdgrade children. J Am Diet Assoc. 1993;93:1431-1436.
    • 3. Weber JL, Lytle L, Gittelsohn J, Cunningham-Sabo L, Anliker KHJ, Stevens J, Hurley J, Ring K. Validity of self-reported dietary intake at school meals by American Indian children: The pathways study. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004;104:746-752.
    • 4. McPherson RS, Hoelscher DM, Alexander M, Scanlon KS, Serdula MK. Dietary assessment methods among school-aged children: Validity and reliability. Prev Med. 2000; 31:S11-S33.
    • 5. Baxter SD, Smith AF, Guinn CH, Thompson WO, Litaker MS, Baglio ML, Shaffer NM, Frye FHA. Interview format influences the accuracy of children's dietary recalls validated with observations. Nutr Res. 2003;23:1537-1546.
    • 6. Macdiarmid J, Blundell J. Assessing dietary intake: Who, what and why of underreporting. Nutr Res Rev. 1998;11:231-253.
    • 7. Hill RJ, Davies PSW. The validity of self-reported energy intake as determined using the doubly labelled water technique. Br J Nutr. 2001;85:415-430.
    • 8. Livingstone MBE, Robson PJ. Measurement of dietary intake in children. Proc Nutr Soc. 2000;59:279-293.
    • 9. Baranowski T, Baranowski J, Doyle C, Wang, DQT, Smith, M, Lin, LS, Hearn, MD, Resnicow, K, Thompson, W. O. Toward reliable estimation of servings of fruit and vegetables and fat practices from adults' 7-day food records. J Nutr Educ. 1997;29:321-326.
    • 10. Moore L, Moore G, Tapper K, Lynch, R, Desousa, C, Hale, J, Roberts, C, Murphy, S.. Free breakfasts in schools: design and conduct of a cluster randomised controlled trial of the Primary School Free Breakfast Initiative in Wales [ISRCTN18336527]. BMC Public Health. 2007;7.
    • 11. Goris AHC, Westerterp-Plantenga MS, Westerterp KR. Undereating and underrecording of habitual food intake in obese men: selective underreporting of fat intake. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;71:130-134.
    • 12. Novotny J, Rumpler WV, Riddick H, Hebert, JR, Rhodes, D, Judd, JT, Baer, DJ, McDowell, M, Briefel, R,Personality characteristics as predictors of underreporting of energy intake on 24-hour dietary recall interviews. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003;103:1146- 1151.
    • 13. Tooze JA, Subar AF, Thompson FE, Troiano R, Schatzkin A, Kipnis V. Psychosocial predictors of energy underreporting in a large doubly labeled water study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79:795-804.
    • 14. Black AE, Cole TJ. Biased over- or under-reporting is characteristic of individuals whether over time or by different assessment methods. J Am Diet Assoc. 2001;101:70- 80.
    • 15. Rennie KL, Jebb SA, Wright A, Coward WA. Secular trends in under-reporting in young people. British Journal of Nutrition 2005;93:241-247.
    • 16. Baxter SD, Royer JA, Hardin JW, Guinn CH, Smith AF. Fourth-grade Children are Less Accurate in Reporting School Breakfast than School Lunch during 24-Hour Dietary Recalls. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2007;39:126-133.
    • 17. Bellisle F. Effects of diet on behaviour and cognition in children. Br J Nutr. 2004;92:S227-S232.
    • 18. Baddeley AD. Human memory: Theory and practice 2nd ed. Hove: Psychology Press, 1997.
    • 19. Tulving E. Elements of Episodic Memory. New York, 1983.
    • 20. Baddeley AD, Hitch G, eds. Working memory New York: Academic Press, 1974.
    • 21. Folkard S, Wever RA, Wildgruber C. Multioscillatory control of circadian rhythms in human performance. Nature. 1983;305:223-226.
    • 22. Buckhalt JA, El-Sheikh M, Keller P. Children's sleep and cognitive functioning: Race and socioeconomic status as moderators of effects. Child Development. 2007;78:213- 231.
    • 23. Wardle J, Robb K, Johnson F. Assessing socioeconomic status in adolescents: the validity of a home affluence scale. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002;56:595-599.
    • 24. Tapper K, Murphy S, Lynch R, Clark R, Moore G, Moore L. Development of a scale to measure 9-11 year olds' attitudes towards breakfast. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007;Epub ahead of press March 21.
    • 25. Goodman RPD. Psychometric Properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. [Article]. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001;40:1337-1345.
    • 26. Moore GF, Tapper K, Murphy S, Clark R, Lynch R, Moore L. Validation of a selfcompletion measure of breakfast foods, snacks and fruits and vegetables consumed by 9-11 year old schoolchildren. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007;61:420-430.
    • 27. Reijneveld SA, Stronks K. The validity of self-reported use of health care across socioeconomic strata: a comparison of survey and registration data. Int J Epidemiol. 2001;30:1407-1414.
    • 28. Moore GF, Tapper K, Murphy S, Lynch R, Raisanen L, Pimm C, Moore L. Associations between deprivation, attitudes towards eating breakfast and breakfast eating behaviours in 9-11 year olds. Public Health Nutr. 2007;10:582-589.
    • 29. Baranowski T, Domel SB. A Cognitive Model of Childrens Reporting of Food-Intake. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994;59:S212-S217.
    • 30. Moore L, Tapper K, Dennehy A, Cooper A. Development and testing of a computerised 24-h recall questionnaire measuring fruit and snack consumption among 9-11 year olds. Eur Journal Clin Nutr. 2005;59:809-816.
    • 31. Kremers SPJ, de Bruijn GJ, Droomers M, van Lenthe F, Brug J. Moderators of environmental intervention effects on diet and activity in youth. Am Journal Prev Med. 2007;32:163-172.
    • 32. Armstrong R, Waters E, Moore L, Riggs E, Cuervo LG, Lumbiganon P, Hawe P. Improving the reporting of public health intervention research: advancing TREND
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article