Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Syed, Mosa Saleh Al Haddad Al
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
With markets going global and competitions turning intense, Organizations are fast realizing the immense potential of a proactive Supply Chain Management (SCM) to improving their market positions in this cut-throat business environment.\ud The research aims at developing a supply chain framework model that enables SMEs to improve their SCM performance and to have a sustainable business growth in dynamic\ud environment. To fulfill the foremost aim, the following objectives have been set as follows.\ud To fulfill the foremost aim, the following objectives have been set:\ud 1. To contribute to the bod of knowledge to the both Supply Chain Management and Saudi Arabian SMEs manufacturing by reviewing pertinent literature of the same field. Knowledge in this study refers to as information, understanding and skills that one gain during research and education.\ud 2. To investigate the current SCM practice of Saudi Arabia SMEs manufacturing sector by explorative approach, broad reliable and valid survey questionnaires distributed to 320 SMEs companies (Chapter 4).\ud 3. To identify the gap within the current supply chain dimensions of SMEs against world class companies (Chapter 5) by statistical analyzing the survey questionnaires\ud developed in chapter four.\ud 4. To suggest appropriate methodological design using robust techniques that is to developed framework model (Chapter 6).\ud 5. To develop qualitative assessment approach in the form of focus group to theoretically and practically validate and test the framework model ( Chapter 6).\ud 6. To benchmark the developed model with different model in the same field.\ud A sample of 150 of Saudi Arabia SMEs within the manufacturing sector was surveyed aimed at identifying the gap between SCM practices as adopted by the world class\ud organizations and the actual practices adopted by SMEs under investigation.\ud The research carried out using multiple research methods, i.e. quantitative and qualitative methods. This is mainly to gain multiple perspectives on the issue and filter\ud out the real problem to be understood and worked upon.\ud The framework model was developed based on literature review, other works in the same field, and the results of the field work study (survey) and the working experience\ud of the researcher in the manufacturing sector for more than 20 years. The model was validated theoretically and practically with a predetermined selected manufacturing\ud company.\ud The significance of the research work could be best understood from the overall results which make important contributions to supply chain management system. The study is significant as it aids in better understanding of an issue which is of increasing importance to both the organizational practice and academic literature.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • G. D. (1998), "Which Contractor Selection Methodology?" International Journal of Project Management,vol 16(3), pp. 153-164.
    • Gilson C.(1973), “Convenience-package banning: economic and environmental implications”. Academy of Marketing Science Journal,vol1(1):pp 75-9.
    • Giunipero, L.C., Brand, R.R. (1996), "Purchasing's role in supply chain management", International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 7 No.1, pp.29-38.
    • Goodman, L. E., & Dion, P. A. (2001), “ The determinants of commitment in the distributor-manufacturer relationship”. Industrial Marketing Management, vol 30,pp 287-300.
    • Gunasekaran, A., C. Patel, and E. Tirtiroglu (2001), "Performance Measures and Metrics in A Supply Chain Environment," International Journal of Operations and Production Management, vol 21 (1/2),pp 71-87.
    • Gundlach, G. T., & Murphy, P. E. (1993). "Ethical and legal foundations of relational marketing exchanges. Journal of Marketing,vol 57, pp 35- 46.
    • Gundlach, G. T., Achrol, R. S., & Mentzer, J. T. (1995), "The structure of commitment in exchange. Journal of Marketing, vol 59, pp78- 92.
    • Ireland, R.D. & Webb, J.W. 2007, ” Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating competitive advantage through streams of innovation”, Business Horizons, 50(1): 49- 59.
    • Lambert, D., & Stock, J. (1993), “Strategic logistics management (3rd ed.)”. Irwin.
    • Lambert, D.M. and Cooper, M.C., (2000), "Issues in supply chain management.
    • Industr. Market. Mgmt,vol 29,pp 65-83.
    • Lamming, R.C., (1993), “ Beyond Partnership: Strategies for Innovation and Lean Supply”. Prentice Hall, Hemel, Hempstead.
    • Lascelles, D.M. and B.G. Dale.(1990), "Examining the Barriers to Supplier Development," International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, vol (7:2), pp. 46-56.
    • Lascelles, D.M. and Dale, B.G. (1990). "Quality management: The Chief Executive's Perception and Role. European Management Journal, 8(1), pp.67-75.
    • Porter, M.E., (1995), " Competitive Advantage, Free Press, New York, NY, 1985.
    • Prahalad, C.K., Hamel, G. (1990), "The core competence of the corporation", Harvard Business Review, Vol. 68 No.3, pp.79-91.
    • Pritchard, Mark, Mark Havitz, and Dennis Howard (1999), “Analyzing the Commitment-Loyalty Link in Service Relationships,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol 27 (3),pp 333-48.
    • R.E. Spekman, J.W. Kamauff, N. Myhr, (1998), “ An empirical investigation into supply chain management: a perspective on partnerships”, Supply Chain Management, vol 3 (2), pp 53-67.
    • R.M. Monczka, K.J. Petersen, R.B. Handfield, G.L. Ragatz, (1998), “ Success factors in strategic supplier alliances: the buying company perspective”, Decision Science, vol 29 (3) pp 5553-5577.
    • R.Y. (2004), “Assuring information quality”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 20 No. 3, p. 11.
    • Raghunathan, S. (2003). "Impact of Demand Correlation of the Value of and Incentives for Information Sharing in a Supply Chain. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.146, pp 634-649.
    • Reichheld F. F. (1996), "The Loyalty Effect. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press Review, 80, 25-27.
    • Rindfleisch, A., & Heide, J. B. (1997), “ Transaction cost analysis: past, present, and future applications”. Journal of Marketing, vol 61,pp 30-54.
    • Ritchie, L., Burnes, B., Whittle, P. and Hey, R. (2000), “The benefits of reverse logistics: the case of Manchester Royal Infirmary Pharmacy”, Supply Chain Management, Vol. 5, pp. 226-34.
    • Ritchie, L., Burnes, B., Whittle, P., Hey, R. (1999), "The benefits of reverse logistics: the case of the Manchester Royal Infirmary Pharmacy", Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 5 No.5, pp.226-331.
    • Rittenberg, L. and T.D.(1999), “ Tregarthen. Economics, 2nd ed., Worth Publishing, New York, 1999.
    • Robert M. Morgan and Shelby D. Hunt (1994),”The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58, No. 3, pp. 20-38.
    • Robson, C (1993), Real World Research: a Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioners-Researchers, Rogers, D., Tibben-Lembke, R. (2001), “An examination of reverse logistics 1.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article