Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Mutch, A; Delbridge, R; Ventresca, M (2006)
Publisher: Sage Publications
Languages: English
Types: Article
This paper advances a relational sociology of organization that seeks to address concerns over how organizational action is understood and situated. The approach outlined here is one which takes ontology seriously and requires transparency and consistency of position. It aims at causal explanation over description and/or prediction and seeks to avoid pure voluntarism or structural determinism in such explanation. We advocate relational analysis that recognizes and engages with connections within and across organization and with wider contexts. We develop this argument by briefly reviewing three promising approaches: relational pragmatism, the social theorizing of Bourdieu and critical realism, highlighting their ontological foundations, some similarities and differences and surfacing some methodological issues. Our purpose is to encourage analysis that explores the connections within and between perspectives and theoretical positions. We conclude that the development of the field of organization theory will benefit from self conscious and reflexive engagement and debate both within and across our various research positions and traditions only if such debates are conducted on the basis of holistic evaluations and interpretations that recognize (and value) difference.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Aldrich, H. (1992) 'Incommensuable paradigms? Vital signs from three perspectives', in M. Reed and M. Hughes (eds.), Rethinking Organization, London: Sage, 17-45.
    • Archer, M. (1979) Social Origins of Educational Systems, London: Sage.
    • Archer, M. (1995) Realist Social Theory: the morphogenetic approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Archer, M. (1996) Culture and Agency: the place of culture in social theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Archer, M. (2003) Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Barley, S. and Tolbert, P. (1997) 'Institutionalization and structuration: studying the links between action and institution', Organization Studies, 18(1) 93-117. of organizations', in R. Westwood and S. Clegg (Eds.) Debating POrganization, Bhaskar, R. (1979) The Possibility of Naturalism, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester.
    • Boal, K. B., Hunt, J. G. and Jaros, S. J. (2003) 'Order is free: on the ontological status Oxford: Blackwell, 84-97. - t
    • Bourdieu, P. (1990) The Logic of Practice, Cambridge: Polity.
    • Contu, A. and Willmott, H. (2005) sspin 'You me round: The realist turn in Collier, A. (1994) Critical Realism: an introduction to the philosophy of Roy Bhaskar, London: Verso.
    • 1645-1662. o organization and management studies', Journal of Management Studies, 42(8), Delbridge, R., and Ezzamel, M. (2005) 'The strength of difference: Contemporary conceptions of control', Organization, 12(5), 603-618.
    • Inns, D. (2002) 'Metaphor in the literature of organizational analysis: a preliminary taxonomy and a glimpse at a humanities-based perspective', Organization, 9(2), 305-330.
    • Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980) Metaphors we live by, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    • Lounsbury, M., and Ventresca, M. (2003) 'The new structuralism in organizational theory', Organization, 10(3), 457-480.
    • McKelvey, B. (2003) 'From fields to science: can organization studies make the transition?', in R. Westwood and S. Clegg (Eds.) Debating Organization, Oxford: Blackwell, 47-72.
    • Mutch, A. (2005) 'Discussion of Willmott - Critical realism, agency and discourse: Moving the debate forward', Organization, 12(5), 781-786.
    • Ozbilgin, M. and Tatli, A. (2005) 'Book review essay: Understanding PBourdieu's Outhwaite, W. (1987) New Philosophies of Social Science: realism, hermeneutics and critical theory, London: Macmillan. contribution to organization and management -studies', Academy of t Management Review, 30(4), 855-869.
    • studies', Journal of Management sStudies,42(8), 1621-1644.
    • Panofsky, E. (1957) Gothic architecture and scholasticism, Cleveland: Meridian.
    • Reed, M. (2005a) 'Reflections on the 'realist turn' in organization and management o
    • Reed, M. (2005b) 'Doing the loco-motion: response to Contu and Willmott's commentary on 'the realist turn' in organization and management studies', Journal of Management Studies, 42(8), 1663-1673.
    • Rose, S. (1993) The Making of Memory: from molecules to mind, London: Bantam. 28
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article