LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Ghazaryan, Narine (2010)
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
Subjects:
The central focus of the research conducted is the European Neighbourhood Policy aimed at developing the relations of the European Union with its neighbours in the East and South. The European Neighbourhood Policy has an extensive nature: it covers a wide-stretching geopolitical area including sixteen countries. The policy is also extensive in terms of its all-encompassing substance: it envisages cooperation between the parties on issues ranging from trade to border control. The research question contextualises the policy in geographical and substantive terms. The region of the South Caucasus was chosen to limit the research question to certain geographical framework. This is motivated by the complexities inherent in this geographical area. The nominal region of South Caucasus comprises Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan. The peculiarities of these states derive from complexities inherent within these states, complexities between the states, as well as between various geopolitical actors whose interests come across here. In substantive terms the research question is limited to the framework of promoting the European Union's democratic values. The main questions addressed in this relation are: what the Union's democratic values are and whether the policy in question offers sufficient mechanisms for their transposition to the South Caucasian countries. For this purposes the instruments and methodologies of the policy have been analysed. The democratic values of the Union have also been considered. Within this narrative, a comparative analysis of the process of the ENP implementation in three states has been undertaken to evaluate its effectiveness in promoting the democratic values of the European Union. The research is finalised with a summary of findings.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • THE ENP IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS .......................................................................................................... 66 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 66 2. Interests o f the EU in the South Caucasus ................................................................................ 68 2.1. Pursing interests in a crowded geopolitical scene ........................................................................... 70 2.2. Interests of other international actors ............................................................................................. 74 3. ENP objectives; democracy promotion within a security framework? ..................................... 85 3.1. The ENP and the EU's security agenda ................................................................................·............ 86 3.2. Democracy promotion within the ENP ............................................................................................. 92 4. ENP as a form o f Europeanisation ........................................................................................... 98 5. Conclusion .............................................................................................................................. 101
    • THE EUROPEAN NEIGHBOURHOOD POLICY: CONSTITUTIONAL ASPECTS .......................................................... 105 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 105 2. The ENP within the EU's constitutional and institutional setup ...................................... ·.. ·.. · 107 2.1. The ENP and EU constitutional law: Treaty structure .................................................................... 107 2.2. EU institutions and Member States ............................................................................................... 112 3. Instruments and methods o f the ENP; ................................................................................... 119 3.1. ENP instruments: borrowing from enlargement .............................................. ·...... ·.. ·.... ·..........·.. · 123 3.2. ENP methodology ........................................................................................................................... 127
    • TRANSPOSITION OF DEMOCRATIC VALUES IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS II: MONITORING AND ASSISTANCE ....... " ...... 250 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 250 2. Monitoring 0/ political reform in the South Caucasus ........................................................... 252 2.1. Monitoring through political dialogue ........................................................................................... 252 2.2. Assessment of progress by the Commission .................................................................................. 256 3. Implementation: assistance under the ENPI ............................................·.................... ·.. ·.... · 266 3.1. Democracy within the ENPI ............................................................................................................ 266 3.2. Actual measures financed .............................................................................................................. 273 4. Conclusion .............................................................................................................................. 280
    • European Union's 'Democratic Deficit', (1999) II Journal of Theoretical Politics
    • Press, 2008).
    • Assessment', (1997) 3 European Law Journal lOS.
    • University Press, 2008), 244-299.
    • Weale, Democracy, (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007).
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article