Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Mah, Alice (2016)
Publisher: Routledge
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: GE
In recent years, grassroots environmental justice activists have increasingly used big data techniques for monitoring, recording, and reporting toxic environmental exposures. Despite the promise of big data for environmental justice, there is a need to address structural barriers to making toxic environmental exposures visible, and to avoid over-relying on new digital methods and techniques as a panacea for problems of voice. The emphasis of real-time analysis in crowdsourced and participatory big data is good at tracking the immediate aftermath of environmental disasters, but it misses slower-burning environmental problems that emerge over time. While big data more generally may have implications for understanding toxic exposure landscapes across different temporal and spatial scales, it is complex, difficult to analyze, and faces significant problems of reliability. There are three key blind spots of the ethos and practice of big data in relation to environmental justice: voice, speed, and expertise. In the context of increasing pressure to embrace new tools and technologies, it is also important to slow down and to reflect on the wider implications of the age of big data.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Allen, B. 2003. Uneasy Alchemy: Citizens and Experts in Louisiana's Chemical Corridor Disputes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    • Anema, A., S. Kluberg, K. Wilson, R. S. Hogg, K. Khan, S. I. Hay, A. J. Tatem, and J. S. Brownstein. 2014. “Digital Surveillance for Enhanced Detection and Response to Outbreaks.” The Lancet Infectious Diseases 14 (11): 1035- 1037. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70953-3.
    • Auyero, J., and D. A. Swistun. 2009. Flammable: Environmental Suffering in an Argentine Shantytown. New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Back, L. 2007. The Art of Listening. Oxford: Berg.
    • Bollier, D. 2010. The Promise and Peril of Big Data. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
    • Bonney, R., C. B. Cooper, J. Dickinson, S. Kelling, T. Phillips, K. V. Rosenberg, and J. Shirk. 2009. “Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy.” BioScience 59 (11): 977-984. doi:10.1525/bio. 2009.59.11.9.
    • Boudia, S., and N. Jas. 2014. “Introduction.” In Powerless Science?: Science and Politics in a Toxic World, edited by S. Boudia and N. Jas, 1-26. Vol. 2. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.
    • boyd, D., and K. Crawford. 2012. “Critical Questions for Big Data.” Information, Communication & Society 15 (5): 662- 679. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878.
    • Breen, J., S. Dosemagen, J. Warren, and M. Lippincot. 2015. “Mapping Grassroots: Geodata and the Structure of Community-Led Open Environmental Science.” ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 14 (3): 849-873.
    • Brown, P. 1997. “Popular Epidemiology Revisited.” Current Sociology 45 (3): 137-156. doi:10.1177/001139297045003008.
    • Brownstein, J. S., C. C. Freifeld, and L. C. Madoff. 2009. “Digital Disease Detection - Harnessing the Web for Public Health Surveillance.” New England Journal of Medicine 360 (21): 2153-2157. doi:10.1056/NEJMp0900702.
    • Bullard, R. 2005. The Quest for Environmental Justice: Human Rights and the Politics of Pollution. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books.
    • Bullard, R., and B. Wright. 2009. Race, Place, and Environmental Justice after Hurricane Katrina: Struggles to Reclaim, Rebuild, and Revitalize New Orleans and the Gulf Coast. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
    • Butler, D. 2013. “When Google Got Flu Wrong.” Nature 494: 155-156. doi:10.1038/494155a.
    • Choy, T. 2011. Ecologies of Comparison: An Ethnography of Endangerment in Hong Kong. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    • Conley, J. F. 2011. “Estimation of Exposure to Toxic Releases Using Spatial Interaction Modeling.” International Journal of Health Geographics 10 (1): 20-32. doi:10.1186/1476- 072X-10-20.
    • Corburn, J. 2005. Street Science: Community Knowledge and Environmental Health Justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    • Cukier, K., and V. Mayer-Schoenberger. 2013. “The Rise of Big Data: How It's Changing the Way We Think About the World.” Foreign Affairs 92: 28-40.
    • Davies, T., and A. Polese. 2015. “Informality and Survival in Ukraine's Nuclear Landscape: Living with the Risks of Chernobyl.” Journal of Eurasian Studies 6 (1): 34-45. doi:10.1016/j.euras.2014.09.002.
    • Egeghy, P. P., R. Judson, S. Gangwal, S. Mosher, D. Smith, J. Vail, and E. A. C. Hubal. 2012. “The Exposure Data Landscape for Manufactured Chemicals.” Science of the Total Environment 414 (1): 159-166. doi:10.1016/j. scitotenv.2011.10.046.
    • Elliott, J. R., and S. Frickel. 2013. “The Historical Nature of Cities: A Study of Urbanization and Hazardous Waste Accumulation.” American Sociological Review 78 (4): 521- 543. doi:10.1177/0003122413493285.
    • Freifeld, C. C., R. Chunara, S. R. Mekaru, E. H. Chan, T. KassHout, A. A. Iacucci, and J. S. Brownstein. 2010. “Participatory Epidemiology: Use of Mobile Phones for Community-Based Health Reporting.” PLoS Med 7 (12): e1000376. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000376.
    • Frickel, S. 2004. Chemical Consequences: Environmental Mutagens, Scientist Activism, and the Rise of Genetic Toxicology. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
    • Frickel, S., S. Gibbon, J. Howard, J. Kempner, G. Ottinger, and D. J. Hess. 2010. “Undone Science: Charting Social Movement and Civil Society Challenges to Research Agenda Setting.” Science, Technology & Human Values 35 (4): 444-473. doi:10.1177/0162243909345836.
    • Gabrys, J., and H. Pritchard. 2016. “Just Good Enough Data and Environmental Sensing: Moving Beyond Regulatory Benchmarks toward Citizen Action.” In Environmental Infrastructures and Platforms 2015-Infrastructures and Platforms for Environmental Crowd Sensing and Big Data Proceedings of the Workshop. Goldsmiths: University of London.
    • Goodchild, M. F. 2007. “Citizens as Sensors: The World of Volunteered Geography.” GeoJournal 69 (4): 211-221. doi:10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y.
    • Gray, E., W. Jennings, S. Farrall, and C. Hay. 2015. “Big Small Data: Using Multiple Data-Sets to Explore Unfolding Social and Economic Change.” Big Data and Society January-June: 1-6. doi:10.1177/2053951715589418.
    • Hampton, S. E., C. A. Strasser, J. J. Tewksbury, W. K. Gram, A. E. Budden, A. L. Batcheller, C. S. Duke, and J. H. Porter. 2013. “Big Data and the Future of Ecology.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11 (3): 156-162. doi:10.1890/ 120103.
    • Harvey, D. 1989. The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Hastaoglu, M. A., A. Berktay, R. Alnaizy, and I. Kocabas. 2015. “Environmental Science and Pollution Sensing, Monitoring, Modeling, and Remediation.” Environmental Science and Pollution Research 22 (5): 3183-3185. doi:10.1007/s11356- 014-3292-y.
    • Irwin, A. 1995. Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise, and Sustainable Development. London: Routledge.
    • Iyengar, S. 1996. “Framing Responsibility for Political Issues.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 546: 59-70. doi:10.1177/0002716296546001006.
    • Johnson, J. A. 2014. “From Open Data to Information Justice.” Ethics and Information Technology 16 (4): 263-274. doi:10.1007/s10676-014-9351-8.
    • Kinchy, A. J., and S. L. Perry. 2011. “Can Volunteers Pick up the Slack- Efforts to Remedy Knowledge Gaps about the Watershed Impacts of Marcellus Shale Gas Development.” Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum 22 (2): 303-339.
    • Kitchin, R. 2013. “Big Data and Human Geography: Opportunities, Challenges and Risks.” Dialogues in Human Geography 3 (3): 262-267. doi:10.1177/2043820613513388.
    • Laney, D. 2001. “3D Data Management: Controlling Data Volume, Velocity and Variety.” META Group Research Note 6: 70.
    • Latour, B. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    • Laurent, É. 2011. “Issues in Environmental Justice Within the European Union.” Ecological Economics 70 (11): 1846- 1853. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.025.
    • Lerman, J. 2013. “Big Data and Its Exclusions.” Stanford Law Review Online 66: 55-63.
    • Lerner, S. 2010. Sacrifice Zones: The Front Lines of Toxic Chemical Exposure in the United States. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    • Liu, L. 2010. “Made in China: Cancer Villages.” Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 52 (2): 8- 21. doi:10.1080/00139151003618118.
    • Mah, A. 2014. Port Cities and Global Legacies: Urban Identity, Waterfront Work, and Radicalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Markowitz, G. E., and D. Rosner. 2002. Deceit and Denial: The Deadly Politics of Industrial Pollution. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    • Martinez-Alier, J., I. Anguelovski, P. Bond, D. Del Bene, F. Demaria, J. F. Gerber, L. Greyl, et al. 2014. “Between Activism and Science: Grassroots Concepts for Sustainability Coined by Environmental Justice Organizations.” Journal of Political Ecology 21 (1): 19-60.
    • Mei, S., H. Li, J. Fan, X. Zhu, and C. R. Dyer. 2014. “Inferring Air Pollution by Sniffing Social Media.” Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), IEEE/ACM International Conference, August 17-20, 2014, Beijing, China.
    • Michaels, D. 2008. Doubt is Their Product: How Industry's Assault on Science Threatens Your Health. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Monroe, B. L. 2011. “The Five Vs of Big Data in Political Science: Introduction to the Virtual Issue on Big Data in Political Science.” Political Analysis 19: 66-86.
    • Morello-Frosch, R., P. Brown, and S. Zavestoski. 2011. “Introduction.” In Contested Illnesses: Citizens, Science, and Health Social Movements, edited by P. Brown, R. Morello-Frosch, and S. Zavestoski, 3-14. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
    • Mountz, A., A. Bonds, B. Mansfield, J. Loyd, J. Hyndman, M. Walton-Roberts, R. Basu, et al. 2015. “For Slow Scholarship: A Feminist Politics of Resistance through Collective Action in the Neoliberal University.” ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 14 (4): 1235-1259.
    • Murphy, M. 2006. Sick Building Syndrome and the Problem of Encertainty: Environmental Politics, Technoscience, and Women Workers. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    • Newman, G., A. Wiggins, A. Crall, E. Graham, S. Newman, and K. Crowston. 2012. “The Future of Citizen Science: Emerging Technologies and Shifting Paradigms.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10: 298-304. doi:10.1890/110294.
    • Nixon, R. 2011. Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    • Ottinger, G. 2011. “Drowning in Data.” Issues in Science and Technology 27 (3): 71-82.
    • Ottinger, G., and B. R. Cohen. 2011. Technoscience and Environmental Justice: Expert Cultures in a Grassroots Movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    • Plantin, J.-C. 2015. “The Politics of Mapping Platforms: Participatory Radiation Mapping after the Fukushima Daiichi Disaster.” Media, Culture & Society 37 (6): 904- 921. doi:10.1177/0163443715584102.
    • Proctor, R. and L. Schiebinger. 2008. Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    • Ranard, B. L., Y. P. Ha, Z. F. Meisel, D. A. Asch, S. S. Hill, L. B. Becker, A. K. Seymour, and R. M. Merchant. 2014. “Crowdsourcing-Harnessing the Masses to Advance Health and Medicine, a Systematic Review.” Journal of General Internal Medicine 29 (1): 187-203. doi:10.1007/ s11606-013-2536-8.
    • Reed, M. G., and C. George. 2011. “Where in the World is Environmental Justice?” Progress in Human Geography 35 (6): 835-842. doi:10.1177/0309132510388384.
    • Sadd, J., R. Morello-Frosch, M. Pastor, M. Matsuoka, M. Prichard, and V. Carter. 2013. “The Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing but the Ground-Truth: Methods to Advance Environmental Justice and Researcher-Community Partnerships.” Health Education & Behavior 41 (3): 281- 290. doi:10.1177/1090198113511816.
    • Stengers, I. 2011. “'Another Science Is Possible!' A Plea for Slow Science.” Inaugural Lecture of the Willy Calewaert Chair. Brussels: ULB.
    • Swan, M. 2012. “Sensor Mania! The Internet of Things, Wearable Computing, Objective Metrics, and the Quantified Self 2.0.” Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks 1 (3): 217-253. doi:10.3390/jsan1030217.
    • Taylor, D. E. 2014. Toxic Communities: Environmental Racism, Industrial Pollution, and Residential Mobility. New York: New York University Press.
    • Tesh, S. N. 2000. Uncertain Hazards: Environmental Activists and Scientific Proof. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    • Uprichard, E. 2013. “Focus: Big Data, Little Questions?” Discover Society 1. http://discoversociety.org/wp-content/ uploads/2013/10/DS_Big-Data.pdf.
    • Vayena, E., M. Salathé, L. C. Madoff, and J. S. Brownstein. 2015. “Ethical Challenges of Big Data in Public Health.” Plos Computational Biology 11 (2): e1003904. doi:10.1371/ journal.pcbi.1003904.
    • Vrijheid, M. 2000. “Health Effects of Residence Near Hazardous Waste Landfill Sites: A Review of Epidemiologic Literature.” Environmental Health Perspectives 108 (s1): 101-112. doi:10.1289/ehp.00108s1101.
    • Walker, G. P. 2012. Environmental Justice. London: Routledge.
    • Whatmore, S. J. 2009. “Mapping Knowledge Controversies: Science, Democracy and the Redistribution of Expertise.” Progress in Human Geography 33 (5): 587-598. doi:10.1177/0309132509339841.
    • Wylie, S. 2015. “Civic Science: Building Tools and Platforms for Grassroots Study of the Energy Industry.” In Energy Wise: Citizen Scientists and Open Data, Shifting Energy Series. EnviroHealthSense, Centre for Science, Technology, and Society, Drexel University. May 27. http://www.envirohealthsense.org/project/shifting-energy-cul tures-drexel
    • Wynne, B. 1996. 'May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert-Lay Knowledge Divide.' In Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology, edited by Lash, S. B. Szerszynski, and B. Wynne. 44-83. London: Sage.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

  • EC | ToxicExpertise

Cite this article