LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Lee, Nick; Senior, Carl; Butler, Michael
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
In this editorial, the authors respond to the 2011 article in the Journal of Management by Becker, Cropanzano, and Sanfey, titled “Organizational Neuroscience: Taking Organizational Theory Inside the Neural Black Box.” More specifically, the authors build on the ideas of Becker et al. first to clarify and extend their work and then to explore the critical philosophical issues involved in drawing inferences from neuroscientific research. They argue that these problems are yet to be solved and that organizational researchers who wish to incorporate neuroscientific advances into their work need to engage with them.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Blakemore, S.J., Winston, J. & Frith, U. (2004). Social Cognitive Neuroscience : Where are we heading? 8(5). 216-222.
    • Butler MJR & Senior C. (2007). Research possibilities for organizational cognitive neuroscience. The Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1118(4). 206-210.
    • Butler MJR & Senior C (2007). Towards an organizational cognitive neuroscience. The Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1118(4). 1-17.
    • Christoff, K. & Owen, A.M. (2006). Improving reverse neuroimaging inference: Cognitive domain versus cognitive complexity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(8). 352-353.
    • Chiu, Y. (2010). Moment by moment tracking of attentional fluctuation in the human brain. Unpublished PhD Thesis. The Johns Hopkins University, USA. Available from : Coy, P. (2006). The secret to Google's success. Business Week. March 6th 2006.
    • Foley E, Rippon G, Thai JN, Longe OA, & Senior C. (2012). Dynamic facial expressions evoke distinct activation in the face perception network: A connectivity analysis study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 24(2). 507-520.
    • Friston, K.J. (2000). The labile brain. Transient and non-linear Coupling. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. P. Biological sciences. 355 (1394). 215-236.
    • Gallo, C. (2006). How to run a meeting like Google. Business Week, September 27th.
    • Greene, J.D., Sommerville, R.B., Nystrom, L.E., Darley, J.M., & Cohen, J.D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral Judgment. Science, 293(5537). 2105- 2108.
    • Haxby, J.V., Gobbini, I.M., Furey, M.L., Ishai, A., Schouten, J.L. & Pietrini P. (2001). Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in central temple cortex. Science, 293(5539). 2425-2430.
    • Henson, R.N. (2006). Forward inference in functional neuroimaging: dissociations vs associations. Trends in Cognitive Science, 10(2). 64-69.
    • Judge, T.A. & Piccolo, R.F. (2004). Transformational and Transactional Leadership: A Metaanalytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology. 89(5). 755-768.
    • Lindstrom, M. (2011). You love your iPhone. Literally. New York Times, October 1, 2011, Page A21 (New York Edition).
    • Logothetis, N. K.(2008). What we can do and we cannot do with fMRI. Nature. 453 (7197). 869-878.
    • Longe OA, Senior C, & Rippon G (2009). Lateral and ventromedial PFC work as a dynamic integrated system: evidence from fMRI connectivity analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 21(1). 141-154.
    • Nicholson, N. (2010). Design of work: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior.31(2).422-431.
    • Norman, K.A., Polyn S.M., Detre, G.J. & Haxby, J.V. (2006). Beyond mind reading: Multi voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data. Trends in Cognitive Science. 10(9). 424-430.
    • Poldrack, R.A. (2011, in press). The future of fMRI in cognitive neuroscience. Neuroimage.
    • Poldrack, R.A. (2008). The role of fMRI in cognitive neuroscience: where do we stand? Current opinion in neurobiology. 18. 223-227.
    • Poldrack, R.A. (2006). Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 10 (??). 59-63.
    • Price, C.J., & Friston, K.J.(1997). Cognitive conjunction: a new approach to brain activation experiments. Neuroimage. 5 (1). 261-270.
    • Ramsey, J.D., Hanson, S.J., Hanson.C., Halchenko, Y.O., Poldrack, R.A., Glymour, C. (2010). Six problems for causal inference from FMRI. Neuroimage. 49(2). 1545-1558.
    • Senior, C. & Lee N.J. (2008). A manifesto for neuromarketing science. Journal of Consumer Behavior. 7(4/5). 263-271.
    • Senior, C & Rippon G. (2007). Cognitive neuroscience : Contributions from psychophysiology ? International Journal of Psychophysiology. 63(2). 135-136.
    • Senior C, Butler M.J.R & Lee N. (2008). Fear and loathing in the work place. The American Journal of Bioethics. 8(5). 20-21.
    • Van Vugt, M., Hogan, R. & Kaiser, R.B. (2008). Leadership, Followership and evolution. American Psychologist. 63(3). 182-196.
    • Vul E, Harris, C, Winkielman P. & Pashler H. (2009). Puzzingly high correlations in fMRI studies of Emotion, Personality and Social Cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 274-290, 2009.
    • Waters, F. Rock, D, Dragovic M, Jablensky, A. (2011). 'Social dysmetria' in first episode psychosis patients. Acta Psychiatrica Scandanavica, 123(6). 475-484.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article