Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Onraet, Emma; Van Hiel, Alain; Dhont, Kristof (2013)
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Languages: English
Types: Article
The relationship between right-wing ideological attitudes and psychological well-being has been intensively studied. While some studies supported the hypothesis that right-wing attitudes are negatively related with well-being, other research yielded positive or non-significant relationships. We conducted a meta-analysis (total samples = 97, total N = 69,221) of measures of well-being, including positive and negative affect, life satisfaction, self-esteem and intrinsic goal pursuit. The obtained effect sizes were generally weak and non-significant, except for a moderate relationship between intrinsic goal pursuit and social dominance orientation. Our results thus do not support previous theories that claim that right-wing attitudes yield substantial relationships with psychological well-being.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper and Row.
    • * Akrami, N., & Ekehammar, B. (2006). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: Their roots in Big-Five personality factors and facets. Journal of Individual Differences, 27, 117 126.
    • * Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other "authoritarian personality". Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 47-92.
    • Blazer, D.G. & Palmore, E. (1976). Religion and Aging in a Longitudinal Panel. Gerontologist, 16, 82-85.
    • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2005). Comprehensive Metaanalysis Version 2. Englewood, NJ: Biostat.
    • * Boshier, R. (1969). A study of the relationship between self-concept and conservatism. Journal of Social Psychology, 77, 139 140.
    • Brooks, A.C. (2008). Gross national happiness: Why happiness matters for America And how we can get more of it. New York: Basic.
    • * Butler, J. C. (2000). Personality and emotional correlates of right-wing authoritarianism. Social Behavior and Personality, 28, 1 14.
    • Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G. (1999). The affect system: Architecture and operating characteristics. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 133-137.
    • * Cheung, C.-K., & Kwok, S.-T. (1996). Conservative orientation as a determinant of hopelessness. Journal of Social Psychology, 136, 333-347.
    • * Choma, B., Busseri, M. & Stanley, W. (2009). Liberal and conservative political ideologies: different routes to happiness? Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 502 505.
    • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    • Cornelis, I., Van Hiel, A., Roets, A., & Kossowska, M. (2009). Age differences in conservatism: evidence on the mediation effects of personality and cognitive style. Journal of Personality, 77, 51 -88.
    • Cowen, E.L. (1991). In pursuit of wellness. American Psychologist, 46, 404-408.
    • Deci, E.L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum.
    • * De Cremer, D., Cornelis, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2008). To whom does voice in groups matter? Effects of voice on affect and procedural fairness judgments as a function of social dominance orientation. Journal of Social Psychology, 148, 61 76.
    • * Del Prado, A., & Church, A. (2010). Development and validation of the enculturation scale for Filipino Americans. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57, 469 483.
    • * De Zavala, A.G., Cichocka, A., Eidelson, R., & Jayawickreme, N. (2009). Collective narcissism and its social consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1074 1069.
    • Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542-575.
    • Diener, E., & Lucas, R.E. (1999). Personality and subjective well-being. See Kahneman et al 1999, pp. 213 229.
    • Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Very happy people. Psychological Science, 13, 81 84.
    • Demo, D.H. (1985). The measurement of self-esteem refining our methods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1490 1502.
    • * Duriez, B. (2011). Unpublished data. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
    • Duriez, B. (2011). Adolescent ethnic prejudice: Understanding the effects of parental extrinsic versus intrinsic goal promotion. Journal of Social Psychology, 151, 441-454.
    • Duriez, B., Klimstra, T. A., Luyckx, K., Beyers, W., & Soenens, B. (2011). Right-Wing Authoritarianism: Protective factor against or risk factor for depression? European Journal of Personality.
    • Duriez, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Soenens, B., & De Witte, H. (2007). The social costs of extrinsic relative to intrinsic goal pursuits: Their relation with social dominance and racial and ethnic prejudice. Journal of Personality, 75, 757-782.
    • Durlak, J. A., & Lipsey, M. W. (1991). A Practitioners Guide to Meta-analysis. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 291-332.
    • Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A nonpublication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 89- 98.
    • Erikson, E. H. (1982). The life cycle completed. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
    • * Feather, N. T. (1993). Authoritarianism and attitudes toward high achievers. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 65, 152-164.
    • Fein, S., & Spencer, S.J. (1997). Prejudice as self-image maintenance: Affirming the self through derogating others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 31 44.
    • * Gramzow, R. H. & Gaertner, L. (2005). Self-esteem and favoritism toward novel in-groups: The self as an evaluative base. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 801- 815.
    • Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (1986). The causes and consequences of the need for self-esteem: A terror management theory. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Public self and private self. New York: Springer-Verlag.
    • * Güvenc, G., Aktan, T., & Yalcin, M.G. (2010). The relationships between knowledge structures and appraisals of economically disadvantaged adolescents. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 59, 594 615.
    • Haidt, J. (2006). The happiness hypothesis. New York: Basic Books.
    • * Heaven, P. C. (1986). Authoritarianism, directiveness, and self-esteem revisited: A crosscultural analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 7, 225-228.
    • Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998). Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3, 486-504.
    • Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 1539-1558.
    • * Houston, L.N., & Springer, S.I. (1980). Self-esteem and conservatism among female college-students. Psychological Reports, 47, 543 546.
    • * Houston, L.N. (1984). Self-esteem, locus of control, and conservatism. Psychological Reports, 55, 851 854.
    • Jost, J.T., & Banaji, M.R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1 27.
    • Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375.
    • Jost, J.T., & Hunyady, O. (2002). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 111 153.
    • Jost, J.T., & Thompson, E.P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209 232.
    • Kahneman D., & Diener, E., Schwartz N. (1999). Well-being: the foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Found.
    • Kasser, T. (2002). The high price of materialism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press Kasser, T., & Ryan, R.M. (1996). Further examining the American dream: differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 280 287.
    • Levenson, R.W. (2000). Expressive, physiological and subjective changes in emotions across adulthood. Psychology and the aging revolution: How do we adapt to longer life. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
    • * Lippa, R., & Arad, S. (1999). Gender, personality, and prejudice: The display of authoritarianism and social dominance orientation in interviews with college men and women. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 463 493.
    • Lipset, S. (1981). Political man: The social basis of politics. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
    • Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
    • * McFarland, S., & Adelson, S. (1996). An omnibus study of personality, values, and prejudice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Vancouver, British Columbia.
    • * McFarland, S. (1998). Toward a typology of prejudiced persons. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Montreal, Canada.
    • * McFarland, S. G. (1999). Personality, values, and latent prejudice: A test of a causal model. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Society for Political Psychology, Amsterdam.
    • Mehrabian, A. (1996). Relations among political attitudes, personality, and psychopathology assessed with new measures of libertarianism and conservatism. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18, 469-491.
    • Middendorp, C. (1978). Progressiveness and conservatism. The fundamental dimensions of ideological controversy and their relationship to social class. Den Haag/Paris/New York: Mouton.
    • * Moore, J., & Krupat, E. (1971). Relationships between source status, authoritarianism, and conformity in a social influence setting. Sociometry, 34, 122 134.
    • Myers, D.G. & Diener, E. (1995). Who is happy? Psychological Science, 6, 10 19.
    • Myers, D.G. (2000) Faith of Happy Peopl American Psychologist, 55, 56-67.
    • * Nagoshi, J., Terrell, H., & Nagoshi, C. (2007). Changes in authoritarians and coping in college students immediately after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1722 1732.
    • * Napier, J. L., & Jost, J. T. (2008). Why are conservatives happier than liberals? Psychological Science, 19, 565 572.
    • * Ojha, H., & Sah, B. (1990). Personality and socio-familiar correlates of conservatism on Indian youth. International Journal of Psychology, 25, 295 304.
    • Olson, L. R., & Green, J. C. (2006). The religion gap. PS: Political Science & Politics, 39, 455 59.
    • Onraet, E., Van Hiel, A., Dhont, K., & Pattyn, S. (2012). Internal and external threat in relationship with right-wing attitudes. Manuscript submitted for publication.
    • * Peterson, B. E., & Duncan, L. E. (2007). authoritarianism: Marriage, motherhood, and 10 years of aging. Psychology and Aging, 22, 411 - 419.
    • * Peterson, B., & Plamandon, L. (2009). Third culture kids and the consequences of international sojourns on authoritarianism, acculturative balance, and positive affect. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 755 763.
    • * Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L.M., & Malle, B.F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.
    • Rosenthal, R. (1995). Writing meta-analytical reviews. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 183-192.
    • Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68 78.
    • * Seder, J., & friendship networks and subjective well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 438 443.
    • * Sibley, C.G., Asbrock, F., & Perry, R.(2009). Unpublished data. University of Auckland.
    • * Sibley, C.G, & Liu, J.H. (2004). Attitudes toward biculturalism in New Zealand: Social dominance and Pakeha attitudes towards the general principles and resource-specific aspects of bicultural policy. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 33, 88 89.
    • Schlachter, A., Duckitt, J. (2002). Psychopathology, authoritarian attitudes, and prejudice. South African Journal of Psychology, 32, 1-8.
    • * Schlenker, B. R., Chambers, J.R. & Le, B.M. (2012). Conservatives are happier than liberals, but why? Political ideology, personality, and life satisfaction. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 127 146.
    • * Shaffer, B., & Hastings, B. (2004). Self-esteem, authoritarianism, and democratic values in the face of threat. Psychological Reports, 95, 311 316.
    • Sibley C. G., & Duckitt J. (2008). Personality and Prejudice: A Meta-analysis and Theoretical Review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248 279.
    • * Soenens, B., & Duriez, B. (2012). Does conservatism have a self-esteem enhancing function? An examination of associations with contingent self-worth and ill-being in late adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 728 732.
    • * Stellmacher, J., Sommer, G. & Imbeck, J. (2003). Psychologische Ansätze zu einer positiven Menschenrechtserziehung - Determinanten der Einsatzbereitschaft für die Einhaltung von Menschenrechten. In E. H. Witte (Hrsg.), Sozialpsychologie politischer Prozesse (S. 143-166). Lengerich: Pabst.
    • Tomkins, S.S. (1965). Affect and the psychology of knowledge. In S.S. Tomkins, & C.E. Izard (Eds.). Affect, cognition, and personality: Empirical studies (pp. 72 97). New York: Springer.
    • * Van Hiel, A. (2011). Unpublished data. Ghent University.
    • * Van Hiel, A., & Brebels, L. (2011). Conservatism is good for you: Cultural conservatism protects self-esteem in older adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 120- 123.
    • Van Hiel, A., Cornelis, I., & Roets, A. (2007). The intervening role of social worldviews in the relationship between the five-factor model of personality and social attitudes. European Journal of Personality, 21, 131-148
    • Van Hiel, A., Cornelis, I., & Roets, A. (2010). To have or to be? A comparison of materialismbased theories and self-determination theory as explanatory frameworks of prejudice. Journal of Personality, 78, 1037 10370.
    • Van Hiel, A., & De Clercq, B. (2009). Authoritarianism is good for you: Right-wing authoritarianism as a buffering factor for mental distress. European Journal of Personality, 23, 33-50.
    • * Van Hiel, A., & Kossowska, M. (2006). Having few positive emotions, or too many negative feelings? Emotions as moderating variables of authoritarianism effects on racism. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 919 930.
    • Van Hiel, A., Mervielde, I., & De Fruyt, F. (2004). The relationship between maladaptive personality and right-wing ideology. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 405 417.
    • Van Hiel, A., Roets, A., & Cornelis, I. (2010). To have or to be? A comparison of materialism based theories and Self Determination Theory as explanatory frameworks of prejudice. Journal of Personality, 78, 1037-1070.
    • Van Hiel, A., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2009). Ambitions fulfilled? The effects of intrinsic and -integrity and death attitudes. The International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 68, 27-51.
    • Vansteenkiste, M., Duriez, B., Simons, J., & Soenens, B. (2006). Materialistic values and well-being among business students: Further evidence of their detrimental effect. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 2892 2908.
    • Verkasalo, M., Lonnqvist, J.-E., Lipsanen, J. and Helkama, K. (2009). European norms and equations for a two dimensional presentat 21-item portrait values questionnaire. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 780-792.
    • Waterman, A.S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 678 691.
    • Wilson, G. D. (1973). The psychology of conservatism. London: Academic Press.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article