LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Bishop, D (2011)
Publisher: Emerald
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: L1, H1
Purpose\ud – The purpose of this paper is to examine the ways in which the small firm's external relationships influence its approach to formal training and training providers.\ud \ud Design/methodology/approach\ud – A qualitative approach was adopted, involving semi‐structured interviews with senior managers, in 25 small firms in South Wales. These interviews were informed by prior workplace observation and analysis of organisational documentation. Further interviews were conducted with employees in nine of the firms.\ud \ud Findings\ud – The findings indicate that the small firm's informal relationships with trusted, familiar and credible contacts – referred to as insiders, following Gibb – are central to the way in which it perceives both training and training providers. Government agencies, training providers and other traditional stakeholders generally sit outside these informal insider networks, and tend to be viewed as culturally remote by the small firm.\ud \ud Research limitations/implications\ud – The findings emphasise the need for training providers and government agencies to obtain the support and co‐operation of insider networks if they wish to promote training within the small business sector. The main limitations include the relatively narrow geographical focus and the absence of retail firms from the sample.\ud \ud Originality/value\ud – While the importance of informal networks within the small business community is now well established, the constitution of such networks and their effects on attitudes towards training providers are less well understood. The paper helps to address these gaps by starting the process of mapping insider networks and illuminating their impact on small firms' perceptions of training providers.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Managing Director 1. Managing Director 2. Sales Manager 3. Production Operative 1. Managing Director 2. Projects Co-ordinator 3. Web Developer 1. Managing Director 2. Study Director 3. Trials Officer 1. Managing Director 2. PR Assistant 3. PR Executive 4. PR Account Manager 1. Managing Director 2. Production Manager 3. Engineering Technician 4. Engineering Technician 5. Welder / Fitter 1. Managing Director 2. Commercial Officer 3. Service Engineer 4. Service Engineer 1. Managing Director 2. Quality Manager 3. Accounts Supervisor (Part time) 4. Laboratory Technician 1. Operations Director 2. Web Developer / Programmer 3. Web Developer / Programmer 4. Creative Designer 1. Managing Director 2. Marketing Manager 3. Production Manager
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article