LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Walkington, H.; Hill, J.; Kneale, P. (2016)
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:

Classified by OpenAIRE into

ACM Ref: ComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATION
There is no previous study of the benefits of attending a national multidisciplinary conference dedicated to undergraduate researchers, despite the growing number of such conferences internationally. This paper addresses the gap in knowledge of the learning gains from these conferences, and reveals a student driven learning process, a multidisciplinary signature pedagogy. . It presents the results of 90 in depth interviews with student conference participants conducted over three consecutive years of a multidisciplinary National Conference of Undergraduate Research (2012 - 2014). This paper uniquely captures the student voice on their perceived learning gains from this experience. The results reveal that some students co-create a pedagogy of Foucauldian reciprocal elucidation, through a sense of ‘unfinishedness’, allowing them to reflect on their own learning in the light of divergent perspectives, questions and frames of reference. Bidirectional exchange of ideas and insights enabled students to ask and answer questions that transformed each other’s thinking, allowing them to arrive at understandings they could not have achieved by themselves. The opportunity to present research in an authentic setting beyond disciplinary and institutional contexts developed students’ skills and confidence, giving additional value over and above the recognised benefits of engaging in research. The undergraduate research conference is framed as a threshold experience for the development of self-authorship. Significant implications for practice include supporting constructive dialogues between students and the creation of authentic and professional multidisciplinary contexts for sharing research.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Alamodi, A.A., Abu-Zaid, A., Anwer, L.A., Khan, T.A., Shareef, M.A., Shamia, A.A., . . . Yaginuddin, A. (2014). Undergraduate research: An innovative student-centered committee from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Medical Teacher, 36(S1), S36-S42.
    • ACUR 2012. First Australasian Conference of Undergraduate Research (ACUR) [online] accessed on 26 February 2014 from: http://mq.edu.au/ltc/altc/ug_research/acur2012/index.htm
    • Baxter Magolda, M.B. 2004. Self-authorship as the common goal for 21st century education. In . Learning partnerships: Theory and models of practice to educate for selfauthorship, ed. M. Baxter Magolda and P. M. King, 1-36. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
    • Baxter Magolda, M.B. 2009. Educating students for self-authorship. Learning partnerships to achieve complex outcomes. In The university and its disciplines: Teaching ad learning within and beyond disciplinary boundaries, ed. C. Kreber. 143-56. London: Routledge.
    • BCUR 2013. British Conference of Undergraduate Research [online] accessed on 26 February 2014 from: http://www.bcur.org/
    • Brownell, J. E., & Swaner, L. E. (2010). Five high-impact practices: Research on learning
    • Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University 1998. Reinventing Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint for America's Research Universities. Stony Brook, NY: State University of New York-Stony Brook.
    • Charmaz, K. (2009). Shifting the grounds: Constructivist grounded theory methods. In J.M. Morse, P.N. Stern, J. Corbin, B. Bowers, K. Charmaz, and A.E. Clarke (Eds.), Developing grounded theory: The second generation (pp. 127-154). Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
    • Cook-Sather, A. and Alter, Z. 2011. What is and what can be: How a liminal position can change learning and teaching in higher education, Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 42: 37-53
    • Council on Undergraduate Research 2005. Joint statement of principles in support of undergraduate research, scholarship, and creative activities 2005, http://www.cur.org/about_cur/history/joint_statement_of_cur_and_ncur/
    • Denzin, N. K and Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.) 2011. SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research Fourth Edition London: Sage
    • Foucault, M. 1997. Polemics, Politics and Problemitisations, In Essential works of Foucault 1954-1984 Vol 1 Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth, Ed Paul Rainbow, trans Robert Harley and others NY: New Press.
    • Freire, P. 1998. Pedagogy of freedom: Ethics, democracy and civic courage (Lanham, Maryland, Rowman and Littlefield).
    • Foulger, D. 2004. Models of the Communication Process [online] accessed on 26 February 2014 from: http://davis.foulger.info/research/unifiedModelOfCommunication.htm
    • Gregerman, S. R. (2009). Filling the gap: The role of undergraduate research in student retention and academic success. In M. K. Boyd & J. L. Wesemann (Eds.), Broadening participation in undergraduate research: Fostering excellence and enhancing the impact. (pp. 245-256). Washington, DC: Council on Undergraduate Research.
    • Hersh, C., Hiro, M. and Asarnow, H. (2011). The Undergraduate Literature Conference: A Report from the Field. Pedagogy 11(2): 395-404.
    • Hunter, A-B., Laursen, S.L. and Seymour, E. 2007. Becoming a scientist: the role of undergraduate research in students' cognitive, personal, and professional development. Science Education. 91: 36-74.
    • Ibnouf, A., Dou, L., & Knight, J. (2014). The evolution of Qatar as an education hub: Moving to a knowledge-based economy. In J. Knight (Ed.), International education hubs: Student, talent, knowledge-innovation models (pp. 43-61). Dordrecht, Germany: Springer Science and Business Media.
    • Jenkins, A. & Healey, M. (2010). Undergraduate research and international initiatives to link teaching and research. CUR Quarterly, 30(3), 36-42.
    • Kegan, R. 1994. In over our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    • King, P.M. and Kitchener, K.S. 1994. Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
    • Kuh, G.D. 2008. High impact educational practices: what are they, who are they, who has access to them and why they matter, Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities. Available at: http://www.neasc.org/downloads/aacu_high_impact_2008_final.pdf
    • Lodge, C. 2005. From hearing voices to engaging in dialogue: problematising student participation in school improvement, Journal of Educational Change 6, no. 2: 125-146.
    • Lopatto, D. 2006. Undergraduate research as a catalyst for liberal learning. Peer Review, 8 no 1: 22- 25.
    • Lopatto, D. 2007. CBE- Life Science Education 6, 297-306.
    • Lopatto, D. (2009) Science in Solution: The Impact of Undergraduate Research on Student Learning. Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation for Science Advancement .
    • Mabrouk, P. A. 2009. Survey study investigating the significance of conference participation to undergraduate research students. Journal of Chemical Education 86, 1335-1340
    • Mason, J. 1996. Qualitative Researching London: Sage.
    • Meyer, J.H.F. and Land, R. (eds) 2006. Overcoming Barriers to Student Understanding: threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge, London: Routledge.
    • Meyer, J.H.F., Land, R. and Baille, C. (eds) 2010. Threshold Concepts and Transformational Learning, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
    • Mezirow, J. (Ed) 2000. Learning as Transformation: Critical Perspectives on a Theory in Progress. San Francisco: The Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series.
    • NCUR 2013. National Conference on Undergraduate Research, http://www.cur.org/conferences_and_events/student_events/history_of_ncur/
    • Padmaja, A., Laxmi Ramana, V.S.V., & Reddy, P.R. (2015). Importance of research at undergraduate level. Proceedings of the International Conference on Transformations in Engineering Education, 631-632.
    • Palmer, M., O'Kane, P., and Owens, M. 2009. Betwixt spaces: Student accounts of Turning point experiences in the first year transition. Studies in Higher Education 34 (1) 37-54.
    • Popper, K. R. 1972. Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Russell, S.H., Hancock, M.P., and McCullough, J. 2007. Benefits of undergraduate research experiences. Science, 316 no 5824: 548-549.
    • Sandover, S., Partridge, L., Dunne, E., & Burkill, S. (2012). Undergraduate researchers change learning and teaching: A case study in Australia and the United Kingdom. CUR Quarterly, 33(1), 33-39.
    • Savin-Baden, M. 2008. Learning spaces: Creating opportunities for knowledge creation in academic life. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
    • Schulman, Lee S. (2005) Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134, 52-59.
    • Seymour, E., Hunter, A.-B., Laursen, S. L. and DeAntoni, T. (2004). Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three-year study. Science Education, 88: 493-534.
    • Shannon, C.E.A. 1948. Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27: 379-423 and 623-656.
    • Spronken‐Smith, R. and Walker, R. 2010. Can inquiry‐based learning strengthen the links between teaching and disciplinary research? Studies in Higher Education, 35: 723-740.
    • Spronken-Smith, R.A., R. Walker, W. O'Steen, H. Matthews, J. Batchelor, and T. Angelo. 2008. Reconceptualising inquiry-based learning: Synthesis of findings. Wellington, NZ: Ako Aotearoa, The National Centre for Tertiary Teaching Excellence.
    • Spronken-Smith, R. A., Brodeur, J. J., Kajaks, T., Luck, M., Myatt, P., Verburgh, A., Walkington, H., and Wuetherick, B. 2013. Completing the Research Cycle: A Framework for Promoting Dissemination of Undergraduate Research and Inquiry. Teaching and Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal 1 no 2:105-118.
    • Turner, V. (1967) The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual. New York: Cornell University Press.
    • Turner, V. (1974) Dramas, Fields, and Metaphors: Symbolic Action in Human Society. New York: Cornell University Press.
    • van der Rijst, R. M. & Visser-Wijnveen, G. J. (2011). Undergraduate research and inquiry in the Netherlands. CUR Quarterly, 32(2), 32-36.
    • Walkington, H. 2015. Students as researchers: supporting undergraduate research in the disciplines in higher education York: HEA [online] available from:
    • https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/resources/Students%20as%20researchers_ 1.pdf
    • Walkington, H., Griffin, A. L., Keys-Mathews, L., Metoyer, S. K., Miller, W. E., Baker, R ., France, D. 2011. Embedding Research-Based Learning Early in the Undergraduate Geography Curriculum. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 35 (3), 1-16.
    • Willison, J., & O'Regan, K. (2007). Commonly known, commonly not known, totally unknown: A framework for students becoming researchers. Higher Education Research & Development, 26, no 4: 393-409.
    • Yuhao, C. (2014). Student development in undergraduate research programs in China: From the perspective of self-authorship. International Journal of Chinese Education, 3, 53-73.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article