Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Thomas, L; Hudson, J; Oliver, E (2015)
Publisher: Reversal Theory Society
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Implicit measure, Reversal theory, Reversal process., State measure, C800, C600
The development of an easily-administered, valid and reliable meta-motivational state measure, capable of assessing the full spectrum of states, is needed to progress the understanding and application of reversal theory (Apter, 2013). The present paper outlines an adaptation of the Stroop protocol to implicitly measure meta-motivational states, and two subsequent validation studies. Consistent with Stroop principles, it was hypothesised that state congruent stimuli would capture individuals’ attention causing an increased response latency (e.g., Ayres & Sonandre, 2002). Study one (n = 68) assessed the concurrent validity of the Meta-Motivational Stroop task (MMS) against two widely-used explicit measures of state, the Telic/Paratelic State Inventory (T/PSI; O’Connell & Calhoun, 2001) and the State of Mind Indicator for Athletes (SOMIFA; Kerr & Apter, 1999). Contrary to expectations emotionally incongruent stimuli caused a delayed response, interpreted as an interference effect (Rothermund, 2003). Study two (n = 30) manipulated state, through expressive writing and imagery, to assess the ability of the Stroop task to detect changes in state. Results offered some support for the interference effect, with incongruent stimuli resulting in an increased response latency when writing from a telic perspective. Taken together, results suggest an implicit measure of meta-motivational state has some promise, particularly given the observed limitations of explicit measures.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Apter, M. J. (1982). The experience of motivation: The theory of psychological reversals. London: Academic Press.
    • Apter, M. J. (2001). Motivational styles in everyday life: a guide to reversal theory. Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association.
    • Apter, M. J. (2003). On a certain blindness in modern psychology. The Psychologist, 16, 474-475.
    • Apter, M. J. (2013). Developing reversal theory: Some suggestions for future research. Journal of Motivation, Emotion, and Personality, 1, 1-8.
    • Apter, M. J., & Carter, S. (2002). Mentoring and motivational versatility: an exploration of reversal theory. Career Development International, 292-295.
    • Asendorpf, J. B., Banse, R., & Mucke, D. (2002). Dissociation between implicit and explicit personality selfconcept: The case of shy behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 380-393.
    • Ayres, J., & Sonandre, D. A. (2002). The Stroop test for public speaking apprehension. Communication Research Reports, 19, 167-174.
    • Bellew, M., & Thatcher, J. (2002). Metamotivational state reversals in competitive sport. Social Behaviour and Personality, 30, 613-624.
    • Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108(3), 624- 652.
    • Bouma, H. (1973). Visual interference in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words. Vision Research, 13, 762-782.
    • Brunel, F. F., Tietje, C., B, & Greenwald, A. G. (2004). Is the implicit association test a valid and valuable measure of implicit consumer social cognition? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4, 385-404.
    • Cook, M. R., Gerkovich, M. M., Potocky, M., & O'Connell, K. A. (1993). Instruments for the assessment of reversal theory states. Patient Education and Counseling, 22, 99- 106.
    • Cumming, J., Olphin, T., &Law, M. (2007). Self-reported psychological states and physiological responses to di erence types of motivational general imagery. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 29, 629-644.
    • Dasgupta, N., McGhee, D. E., Greenwald, A. G., & Mahzarin, R. B. (2000). Automatic preference for white Americans: Eliminating the familiarity explanation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 316-328.
    • Desselles, M. L., & Apter, M. J. (2013). Manipulating motivational states: A review. Journal of Motivation, Emotion, and Personality, 1, 44-49.
    • Dixon, M. (1994). The benefits of switchable personality. Financial Times, pp.13.
    • Fazio, R. H. (1986). How do attitudes guide behaviour? In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behaviour (p. 204-243). New York: Guilford.
    • Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297-327.
    • Fox, E., Russo, R., Bowles, R., & Dutton, K. (2001). Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 130, 681-700.
    • Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4-27.
    • Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Rudman, L. A., Farnham, S. D., Nosek, B. A., & Mellott, D. S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self esteem, and self concept. Psychological Review, 109, 3-25.
    • Hudson, J., & Day, M. C. (2012). Athletes' experiences of expressive writing about sport stressors. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13, 798-806.
    • Hudson, J., & Walker, N. C. (2002). Metamotivational state reversals during match play golf: An idiographic approach. The Sport Psychologist, 16, 200-217.
    • Hutchison, K. A., & Bosco, A., F. (2007). Congruency effects in the letter search task: Semantic activation in the absence of priming. Memory & Cognition, 35, 514-525.
    • Jacoby, L. L., Lindsay, D. S., & Toth, J. P. (1992). Unconscious influences revealed: Attention, awareness, and control. American Psychologist, 47, 802-809.
    • Kerr, J. H., & Apter, M. J. (1999). The state of mind indicator for athletes. In J. H. Kerr (Ed.), experiencing sport: Reversal theory. Chinchester, England: Wiley.
    • Klein, G. S. (1964). Semantic power measured through the interference of words with color naming. American Journal of Psychology, 77, 576-588.
    • Kunde, W., & Mauer, N. (2008). Sequential modulations of valence processing in the emotional Stroop task. Experimental Psychology, 55(3), 151-156.
    • Kunde, W., & Wuhr, P. (2006). Sequential modulations of correspondence e ects across spatial dimensions and tasks. Memory & Cognition, 34(2), 356-367.
    • LaPiere, R. T. (1934). Attitudes vs. actions. Social Forces, 13, 230-237.
    • Macleod, C. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop e ect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
    • Maio, G. R., Haddock, G., Watt, S. E. & Hewstone, M. (2008). Implicit measures and applied contexts: an illustrative examination of antiracism advertising. In: Petty, R., Fazio, R. and Brinol, P. eds. Attitudes: insights from the new wave of implicit measures. New York: Psychology Press, pp. 327-357.
    • Matthews, A., & Sebastian, S. (1993). Suppression of emotional Stroop e ects by fear-arousal. Cognition and Emotion, 7, 517-530.
    • McKenna F. P., & Sharma, D. (2004). Reversing the emotional stroop e ect reveals that it is not what it seems: the role of fast and slow components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30, 382- 392.
    • Mendoza, S. A., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Amodio, D. M. (2010). Reducing the expression of implicit stereotypes: Reflexive control through implementation intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 512-523.
    • Nier, J. A. (2005). How dissociated are implicit and explicit racial attitudes? A bogus pipeline approach. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8, 39-52.
    • O'Connell, K. A., & Calhoun, J. E. (2001). The telic/paratelic state inventory (T/PSI): Validating a reversal theory measure. Personality & Individual Di erences, 30, 193-204.
    • Pavey, L. J., Greitemeyer, T., & Sparks, P. (2011). Highlighting relatedness promotes prosocial motivation and behaviour. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 905-917.
    • Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. London:Routledge.
    • Rothermund, K. (2003). Motivation and attention: Incongruent e ects of feedback on the processing of valence. Emotion, 3(3), 223-238.
    • Schwarz, N., & Bohner, G. (2001). The construction of attitudes. In A. Tesser & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology: Intraindividual processes (p. 436-457). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
    • Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643- 662.
    • Svebak, S., & Murgatroyd, S. (1985). Metamotivational dominance: A multi-method validation of reversal theory constructs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 107-116.
    • Taylor, S. E. (1991). Asymmetrical e ects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 67-85.
    • Williams, J. M., Watts, F. N., & MacLeod, C. (1996). The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 3-24.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article