Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Doherty, A; Hammerla, N; Jackson, D; Plötz, T; Olivier, P; Granat, MH; White, T; van Hees, VT; Trenell, MI; Owen, CG; Preece, SJ; Gillions, R; Sheard, S; Peakman, T; Brage, S; Wareham, NJ (2017)
Publisher: Public Library of Science
Journal: PLoS One
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Electronics, Research Article, Information Technology, Anatomy, Mathematics, Classical Mechanics, Engineering and Technology, Mathematical and Statistical Techniques, Wrist, Population Groupings, Acceleration, Physical Sciences, Analysis of Variance, Bioenergetics, People and Places, Public and Occupational Health, Physics, Statistics (Mathematics), Biology and Life Sciences, Computer and Information Sciences, Data Processing, Research and Analysis Methods, Musculoskeletal System, Medicine, Age Groups, Physical Activity, Q, R, Biochemistry, Science, Accelerometers, Arms, Medicine and Health Sciences, Limbs (Anatomy), Statistical Methods


Physical activity has not been objectively measured in prospective cohorts with sufficiently large numbers to reliably detect associations with multiple health outcomes. Technological advances now make this possible. We describe the methods used to collect and analyse accelerometer measured physical activity in over 100,000 participants of the UK Biobank study, and report variation by age, sex, day, time of day, and season.


Participants were approached by email to wear a wrist-worn accelerometer for seven days that was posted to them. Physical activity information was extracted from 100Hz raw triaxial acceleration data after calibration, removal of gravity and sensor noise, and identification of wear / non-wear episodes. We report age- and sex-specific wear-time compliance and accelerometer measured physical activity, overall and by hour-of-day, week-weekend day and season.


103,712 datasets were received (44.8% response), with a median wear-time of 6.9 days (IQR:6.5–7.0). 96,600 participants (93.3%) provided valid data for physical activity analyses. Vector magnitude, a proxy for overall physical activity, was 7.5% (2.35mg) lower per decade of age (Cohen’s d = 0.9). Women had a higher vector magnitude than men, apart from those aged 45-54yrs. There were major differences in vector magnitude by time of day (d = 0.66). Vector magnitude differences between week and weekend days (d = 0.12 for men, d = 0.09 for women) and between seasons (d = 0.27 for men, d = 0.15 for women) were small.


It is feasible to collect and analyse objective physical activity data in large studies. The summary measure of overall physical activity is lower in older participants and age-related differences in activity are most prominent in the afternoon and evening. This work lays the foundation for studies of physical activity and its health consequences. Our summary variables are part of the UK Biobank dataset and can be used by researchers as exposures, confounding factors or outcome variables in future analyses.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

Cite this article