Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Longo, Matthew R.; Azanon, E.; Haggard, P. (2010)
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: psyc
The neural circuits underlying initial sensory processing of somatic information are relatively well understood. In contrast, the processes that go beyond primary somatosensation to create more abstract representations related to the body are less clear. In this review, we focus on two classes of higher-order processing beyond somatosensation. Somatoperception refers to the process of perceiving the body itself, and particularly of ensuring somatic perceptual constancy. We review three key elements of somatoperception: (a) remapping information from the body surface into an egocentric reference frame (b) exteroceptive perception of objects in the external world through their contact with the body and (c) interoceptive percepts about the nature and state of the body itself. Somatorepresentation, in contrast, refers to the essentially cognitive process of constructing semantic knowledge and attitudes about the body, including: (d) lexical-semantic knowledge about bodies generally and one’s own body specifically, (e) configural knowledge about the structure of bodies, (f) emotions and attitudes directed towards one’s own body, and (g) the link between physical body and psychological self. We review a wide range of neuropsychological, neuroimaging and neurophysiological data to explore the dissociation between these different aspects of higher somatosensory function.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bayne, T., & Levy, N. (2005). Amputees by choice: Body integrity disorder and the ethics of amputation. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 22, 75-86.
    • Ben-Tovim, D. I., Walker, M. K., Murray, H., & Chin, G. (1990). Body size estimates: Body image or body attitude measures? International Journal of Eating Disorders, 9, 57-67.
    • Bender, M. B. (1952). Disorders in perception: With particular reference to the phenomena of extinction and displacement. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
    • Benedet, M. J., & Goodglass, H. (1989). Body image and comprehension of body part names. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 485-496.
    • Benedetti, F. (1985). Tactile diplopia (diplesthesia) on the human fingers. Perception and Psychophysics, 15, 83-91.
    • Benedetti, F. (1991). Perceptual learning following a long-lasting tactile reversal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 267-277.
    • Benton, A. L. (1992). Gerstmann's syndrome. Archives of Neurology, 49, 445-447.
    • Berlin, B., & Kay, P. (1969). Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    • Berlin, B., Breedlove, D. E., & Raven, P. H. (1973). General principles of classification and nomenclature in folk biology. American Anthropologist, 75, 214-242.
    • Berlucchi, G., & Aglioti, S. M. (1997). The body in the brain: Neural bases of comporeal awareness. Trends in Neurosciences, 20, 560-564.
    • Bermúdez, J. L., Marcel, A., & Eilan, N. (1995). The body and the self. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    • Berryman, L. J., Yau, J. M., & Hsiao, S. S. (2006). Representation of object size in the somatosensory system. Journal of Neurophysiology, 96, 27-39.
    • Bisiach, E., Perani, D., Vallar, G., & Berti, A. (1986). Unilateral neglect: Personal and extrapersonal. Neuropsychologia, 24, 759-767.
    • Bolognini, N., & Maravita, A. (2007). Proprioceptive alignment of visual and somatosensory maps in the posterior parietal cortex. Current Biology, 21, 1890-1895.
    • Bors, E. (1951). Phantom limbs of patients with spinal cord injury. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 66, 610-631.
    • Brang, D., McGeoch, P. D., & Ramachandran, V. S. (2008). Apotemnophilia: A neurological disorder. NeuroReport, 19, 1305-1306.
    • Bremmer, F., Schlack, A., Shah, N. J., Zafiris, O., Kubischik, M., Hoffmann, K., et al. (2001). Polymodal motion processing in posterior parietal and premotor cortex: A human fMRI study strongly implies equivalencies between humans and monkeys. Neuron, 29, 287-896 Bromage, P. R., & Melzack, R. (1974). Phantom limbs and the body schema. Canadian Anaesthetists' Society Journal, 21, 267-274.
    • Brown, C. H. (1976). General principles of human anatomical partonomy and speculations on the growth of partonomic nomenclature. American Ethnologist, 3, 400-424.
    • Burgess, P. R., Wei, J. Y., Clark, F. J., & Simon, J. (1982). Signaling of kinaesthetic information by peripheral sensory receptors. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 5, 171-187.
    • Buxbaum, L. J., & Coslett, H. B. (2001). Specialized structural descriptions for human body parts: Evidence from autotopagnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18, 289-306.
    • Capitani, E., Laiacona, M., Mahon, B., & Caramazza, A. (2003). What are the facts of semantic category-specific deficits? A critical review of the available evidence. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 213-61.
    • Cholewiak, R. W. (1999). The perception of tactile distance: Influences of body site, space, and time. Perception, 28, 851-875.
    • Chung, B. (2001). Muscle dysmorphia: A critical review of the proposed criteria. Perspectives in Biological Medicine, 44, 565-574.
    • Clemo, H. R., & Stein, B. E. (1984). Topographic organization of somatosensory corticotectal influences in cat. Journal of Neurophysiology, 51, 843-858.
    • Cleret de Langavant, L., Trinkler, I., Cesaro, P., Bachoud-Lévi, A.-C. (2009). Heterotopagnosia: When I point at parts of your body. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1745-1755.
    • Clifton, R.K., Gwiazda, J., Bauer, J.A., Clarkson, Marsha G., Held, R. (1988). Growth in head size during infancy: Implications for sound localization. Developmental Psychology, 24, 477-483.
    • Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 240-248.
    • Conomy, J. P. (1973). Disorders of body image after spinal cord injury. Neurology, 23, 842-850.
    • Conway, M. A. (2001). Sensory-perceptual episodic memory and its context: Autobiographical memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 356, 1375-1384.
    • Corradi-Dell'Acqua, C., Hesse, M. D., Rumiati, R. I., & Fink, G. R. (2008). Where is a nose with respect to a foot? The left posterior parietal cortex processes spatial relationships among body parts. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 2879-2890.
    • Corradi-Dell'Acqua, C., Tomasino, B., & Fink, G. R. (2009). What is the position of an arm relative to the body? Neural correlates of body schema and body structural description. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 4162-4171.
    • Coslett, H. B., Saffran, E. M., & Schwoebel, J. (2002). Knowledge of the body: A distinct semantic domain. Neurology, 59, 357-363.
    • Craig, A. D. (2009). How do you feel - now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10, 59-70.
    • Craig, A. D., Chen, K., Bandy, D., & Reiman, E. M. (2000). Thermosensory activation of insular cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 184-190.
    • Critchley, H. D., Wiens, S., Rotshtein, P., Ohman, A., & Dolan, R. J. (2004). Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 189-195.
    • Critchley, M. (1953). The parietal lobes. London: Edward Arnold & Co.
    • Critchley, M. (1974). Misoplegia, or hatred of hemiplegia. Mount Sinai Medical Journal, 41, 82- 87.
    • Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Avon.
    • Damasio, A. R. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. San Diego: Harcourt.
    • De Renzi, E., & Scotti, G., (1970). Autotopagnosia: Fiction or reality. Archives of Neurology, 23, 221-227.
    • Degos, J.-D., Bachoud-Levi, A. C., Ergis, A. M., Petrissans, J. L., & Cesaro, P. (1997). Selective inability to point to extrapersonal targets after left posterior parietal lesions: An objectivization disorder? Neurocase, 3, 31-39.
    • Denes, G., Cappelletti, J. Y., Zilli, T., Dalla Porta, F., Gallana, A. (2000). A category-specific deficit of spatial representation: The case of autotopagnosia. Neuropsychologia, 38, 345- 350.
    • Dennis, M. (1976). Dissociated naming and locating of body parts after left anterior temporal lobe resection: An experimental case study. Brain and Language, 3, 147-163.
    • Denny-Brown, D., Meyer, J. S., & Horenstein, S. (1952). The significance of perceptual rivalry resulting from parietal lesions. Brain, 75, 433-471.
    • Descartes, R. (1989). Discourse on method and the meditations (J. Veitch, trans.). Amherst, NY: Prometheus. (Original work published 1641)
    • Dijkerman, H. C., & de Haan, E. H. F. (2007). Somatosensory processes subserving perception and action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30, 189-239.
    • Dominici, N., Daprati, E., Nico, D., Cappellini, G., Ivanenko, Y. P., & Lacquaniti, F. (2009). Changes in the limb kinematics and walking-distance estimation after shank elongation: Evidence for a locomotor body schema? Journal of Neurophysiology, 101, 1419-1429.
    • Duhamel, J. R., Colby, C. L., & Goldberg, M. E. (1998). Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: Congruent visual and somatic response properties. Journal of Neurophysiology, 79, 126-136.
    • Ehrsson, H. H., Kito, T., Sadato, N., Passingham, R. E., & Naito, E. (2005). Neural substrate of body size: Illusory feeling of shrinking of the waist. PLoS Biology, 3, e412.
    • Elbert, T., Pantev, C., Weinbruch, C., Rockstroh, B., & Taub, E. (1995). Increased cortical representation of the fingers of the left hand in string players. Science, 270, 305-307.
    • Enfield, N. J., Majid, A., & van Staden, M. (2006). Cross-linguistic categorisation of the body: Introduction. Language Sciences, 28, 137-147.
    • Essick, G., James, A., & McGlone, F. P. (1999). Psychophysical assessment of the affective components of non-painful touch. Neuroreport, 10, 2083-2087.
    • Evans, G. (1982). The varieties of reference. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    • Evans, J. H. (1962). On disturbance of the body image in paraplegia. Brain, 85, 687-700.
    • Fasold, O., Heinau, J., Trenner, M. U., Villringer, A., & Wenzel, R. (2008). Proprioceptive head posture-related processing in human polysensory cortical areas. NeuroImage, 40, 1232- 1242.
    • Felician, O., Ceccaldi, M., Didic, M., Thinus-Blanc, C., & Poncet, M. (2003). Pointing to body parts: A double dissociation study. Neuropsychologia, 41, 1307-1316.
    • Felician, O., Romaiguère, P., Anton, J.-L., Nazarian, B., Roth, M., Poncet, M., & Roll, J.-P. (2004). The role of the left superior parietal lobule in body part localization. Annals of Neurology, 55, 749-751.
    • Filimon, F., Nelson, J. D., Huang, R.-S., & Sereno, M. I. (2009). Multiple parietal reach regions in humans: Cortical representations for visual and proprioceptive feedback during on-line reaching. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 2961-2971.
    • First, M. B. (2005). Desire for amputation of a limb: Paraphilia, psychosis, or a new type of identity disorder. Psychological Medicine, 35, 919-928.
    • Flor, H., Elbert, T., Knecht, S., Wienbruch, C., Pantev, C., Birbaumer, N. et al. (1995). Phantomlimb pain as a perceptual correlate of cortical reorganization following arm amputation. Nature, 375, 482-484.
    • Flor, H., Mühlnickel, W., Karl, A., Denke, C., Grüsser, S., Kurth, R., & Taub, E. (2000). A neural substrate for nonpainful phantom limb phenomena. NeuroReport, 11, 1407-1411.
    • Fobair, P., Stewart, S. L., Chang, S., D'Onofrio, C., Banks, P. J., & Bloom, J. R. (2006). Body Graziano, M. S., & Gross, C. G. (1993). A bimodal map of space: Somatosensory receptive fields in the macaque putamen with corresponding visual receptive fields. Experimental Brain Research, 97, 96-109.
    • Graziano, M. S. A., Yap, G. S., & Gross, C. G. (1994). Coding of visual space by premotor neurons. Science, 266, 1054-1057.
    • Graziano, M. S. A., Cooke, D. F., & Taylor, C. S. R. (2000). Coding the location of the arm by sight. Science, 290, 1782-1786.
    • Groh, J. M., & Sparks, D. L. (1996a). Saccades to somatosensory targets. I. Behavioral characteristics. Journal of Neurophysiology, 75, 412-427.
    • Grüsser, S. M., Winter, C., Mühlnickel, W., Denke, C., Karl, A., Villringer, K., & Flor, H. (2001). The relationship of perceptual phenomena and cortical reorganization in upper extremity amputees. Neuroscience, 102, 263-272.
    • Grüsser, S. M., Mühlnickel, W., Schaefer, M., Villringer, K., Christmann, C., Koeppe, C., & Flor, H. (2004). Remote activation of referred phantom sensation and cortical reorganization in human upper extremity amputees. Experimental Brain Research, 154, 97-102.
    • Guariglia, C., & Antonucci, G. (1992). Personal and extrapersonal space: A case of neglect dissociation. Neuropsychologia, 30, 1001-1009.
    • Gurfinkel, V. S., & Levick, Y. S. (1991). Perceptual and automatic aspects of the postural body scheme. In J. Paillard (Ed.), Brain and space (pp. 147-162). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Halligan, P. W., Hunt, M., Marshall, J. C., & Wade, D. T. (1995). Sensory detection without localization. Neurocase, 1, 259-266.
    • Head, H. (1918). Sensation and the cerebral cortex. Brain, 41, 57-253.
    • Head, H., & Holmes, G. (1911). Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesions. Brain, 34, 102-254.
    • Henderson, W. R., & Smyth, G. E. (1948). Phantom limbs. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 2, 88-112.
    • Hirtz, P., & Starosta, W. (2002). Sensitive and critical periods of motor co-ordination development and its relation to motor learning. Journal of Human Kinetics, 7, 19-28.
    • Ho, C., & Spence, C. (2007). Head orientation biases tactile localization. Brain Research, 1144, 136-141.
    • Iwamura, Y. (1998). Hierarchical somatosensory processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 8, 522-528.
    • James, W. (1884). What is an emotion? Mind, 9, 188-205.
    • James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Dover.
    • Johnson, K. O., & Hsiao, S. S. (1992). Neural mechanisms of tactual form and texture perception. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 15, 227-250.
    • Kaas, J. H. (1983). What, if anything, is SI? Organization of first somatosensory area of cortex. Physiological Reviews, 63, 206-231.
    • Kammers, M. P. M., van der Ham, I. J., & Dijkerman, H. C. (2006). Dissociating body representations in healthy individuals: Differential effects of a kinaesthetic illusion on perception and action. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2430-2436.
    • Kemmerer, D., & Tranel, D. (2008). Searching for the elusive neural substrates of body part terms: A neuropsychological study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25, 601-629.
    • Kew, J. J. M., Ridding, M. C., Rothwell, J. C., Passingham, R. E., Leigh, P. N., et al. (1994). Reorganization of cortical blood flow and transcranial magnetic stimulation maps in human subjects after upper limb amputation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 72, 2517-2524.
    • Kinsbourne, M. (1995). Awareness of one's own body: An attentional theory of its nature, development, and brain basis. In J. L. Bermúdez, A. Marcel, & N. Eilan (Eds.), The body and the self (pp. 205-223). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    • Kinsbourne, M., & Warrington, E. K. (1962). A study of finger agnosia. Brain, 85, 47-66.
    • Knecht, S., Henningsen, H., Elbert, T., Flor, H., Hoehling, C., Pantev, C. et al. (1995). Cortical reorganization in human amputees and mislocalization of painful stimuli to the phantom limb. Neuroscience Letters, 201, 262-264.
    • Knecht, S., Henningsen, H., Elbert, T., Flor, H., Höhling, C., Pantev, C., & Taub, E. (1996). Reorganizational and perceptional changes after amputation. Brain, 119, 1213-1219.
    • Koerber, H. R., Hobbs, G., & Brown, P. B. (1993). Precision and variability of hindlimb representation in cat dorsal horn and implications for tactile localization. Journal of Neurophysiology, 70, 2489-2501.
    • Kong, J., White, N. S., Kwong, K. K., Vangel, M. G., Rosman, I. S., Gracely, R. H., et al. (2006). Using fMRI to dissociate sensory encoding from cognitive evaluation of heat pain intensity. Human Brain Mapping, 27, 715-721.
    • Krolak-Salmon, P., Hénaff, M.-A., Isnard, J., Tallon-Baudry, C., Guénot, M., Vighetto, A., et al. (2003). An attention modulated response to disgust in human ventral anterior insula. Annals of Neurology, 53, 446-453.
    • Lackner, J. R. (1988). Some proprioceptive influences on the perceptual representation of body shape and orientation. Brain, 111, 281-297.
    • Laiacona, M., Allamano, N., Lorenzi, L., & Capitani, E. (2006). A case of impaired naming and knowledge of body parts: Are limbs a separate category? Neurocase, 12, 307-316.
    • Le Clec'H, G., Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Mehler, J., Dupoux, E., Poline, J. B., et al. (2000). Distinct cortical areas for names of numbers and body parts independent of language and input modality. NeuroImage, 12, 381-391.
    • Lee, S. (1996). Reconsidering the status of anorexia nervosa as a Western culture-bound syndrome. Social Science and Medicine, 42, 21-34.
    • Lhermitte, J. (1942). De l'image corporelle. Revue Neurologique, 74, 20-38.
    • Lloyd, D. M., Shore, D. I., Spence, C., & Calvert, G. A. (2003). Multisensory representation of limb position in human premotor cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 17-18.
    • Loetscher, T., Regard, M., & Brugger, P. (2006). Misoplegia: A review of the literature and a case without hemiplegia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 77, 1099- 1100.
    • Longo, M. R., & Lourenco, S. F. (2007). Space perception and body morphology: Extent of near space scales with arm length. Experimental Brain Research, 177, 285-290.
    • Majid, A. (2006). Body part categorisation in Punjabi. Language Sciences, 28, 241-261.
    • McClure, E. F. (1975). Ethno-anatomy: The structure of the domain. Anthropological Linguistics, 17, 78-88.
    • Medina, J., & Rapp, B. (2008). Phantom tactile sensations modulated by body position. Current Biology, 18, 1937-1942.
    • Mehnert, U., Boy, S, Svensson, J., Michels, L., Reitz, A., Candia, V., et al. (2008). Brain activation in response to bladder filling and simultaneous stimulation of the dorsal clitoral nerve-An fMRI study in healthy women. NeuroImage, 41, 682-689.
    • Melzack, R. (1990). Phantom limbs and the concept of a neuromatrix. Trends in Neuroscience, patients. In G. N. Gantchev, S. Mori, & J. Massion (Eds.), Motor control: Today and tomorrow (pp. 197-214. Academic Publishing House: Sofia, Bulgaria.
    • Paillard, J., Michel, F., & Stelmach, G. (1983). Localisation without content: A tactile analogue of 'blind sight'. Archives of Neurology, 40, 548-551.
    • Palmer, G. B., & Nicodemus, L. (1985). Coeur d'Alene exceptions to proposed universals of anatomical nomenclature. American Ethnologist, 12, 341-359.
    • Paqueron, X., Leguen, M., Rosenthal, D., Coriat, P., Willer, J. C., & Danziger, N. (2003). The phenomenology of body image distortions induced by regional anaesthesia. Brain, 126, 702-712.
    • Pascual-Leone, A., & Torres, F. (1993). Plasticity of the sensorimotor cortex representation of the reading finger in Braille readers. Brain, 116, 39-52.
    • Pellijeff, A., Bonilha, L., Morgan, P. S., Mckenzie, K., & Jackson, S. R. (2006) Parietal updating of limb posture: An event-related fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2685-2690.
    • Penfield, W., & Faulk, M. E. (1955). The insula: Further observations on its function. Brain, 78, 445-470.
    • Phillips, K. A. (1991). Body dysmorphic disorder: The distress of imagined ugliness. American Journal of Psychiatry, 148, 1138-1149.
    • Phillips, K. A., Didie, E. R., Feusner, J., & Wilhelm, S. (2008). Body dysmorphic disorder: Treating an underrecognized disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 1111-1118, Phillips, M. L., Young, A. W., Senior, C., Brammer, M., Andrew, C., Calder, A. J., et al. (1997). A specific neural substrate for perceiving facial expressions of disgust. Nature, 389, 495- 498.
    • Pitcher, D., Garrido, L., Walsh, V., & Duchaine, B. C. (2008). Transcranial magnetic stimulation disrupts the perception and embodiment of facial expressions. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 8929-8933.
    • Poeck, K., & Orgass, B. (1971). The concept of the body schema: A critical review and some experimental results. Cortex, 7, 254-277.
    • Pons, T. P., Garraghty, P. E., Ommaya, A. K., Kaas, J. H., Taub, E., & Mishkin, M. (1991). Massive cortical reorganization after sensory deafferentation in adult macaques. Science, 252, 1857-1860.
    • Porro, C. A., Martinig, M., Facchin, P., Maieron, M., Jones, A. K. P., & Fadiga, L. (2007). Parietal cortex involvement in the localization of tactile and noxious mechanical stimuli: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Behavioural Brain Research, 178, 183-189.
    • Probst, M.,Vandereycken, W., Coppenolle, H. V., & Pieters, G. (1998). Body size estimation in anorexia nervosa patients: the significance of overestimation. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 44, 451-456.
    • Ramachandran, V. S., Hirstein, W. (1998). The perception of phantom limbs: The D. O. Hebb Lecture. Brain, 121, 1603-1630.
    • Ramachandran, V. S., McGeoch, P. (2007). Can vestibular caloric stimulation be used to treat apotemnophilia? Medical Hypotheses, 69, 250-252.
    • Ramachandran, V. S., Rogers-Ramachandran, D., & Stewart, M. (1992). Perceptual correlates of massive cortical reorganization. Science, 258, 1159-1160.
    • Rapp, B., Hendel, S. K., & Medina, J. (2002). Remodeling of somatosensory hand representations following cerebral lesions in humans. NeuroReport, 13, 207-211.
    • Röder, B., Rösler, F., & Spence, C. (2004). Early vision impairs tactile perception in the blind. Current Biology, 14, 121-124.
  • Inferred research data

    The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    Title Trust
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

Cite this article