Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Nouch, Matthew
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: G1
Brazil is growing economically and, as one of the BRICs, claims to have created 40 million new middle-class persons during the past decade. Participation among lower-income neighbourhoods has been a part of politics in Porto Alegre since the early 1990s, and in most neighbourhoods basic needs have now been met. Middle-class identities unite people across space and different neighbourhoods, and identity politics is emerging, focused on issues of race, gender, and sexual orientation. This means that individual identities can be explored and provided for. The result is the growth of more vocal identity-based groups, while governments have a greater capacity to engage with their needs. \ud Políticas Públicas engages with more groups than ever. Locally, more globalised cultural models and identity classifications have emerged, adapted to the cultural specificities of Rio Grande. LGBT identities are integral to this. These groups seem to be riding the wave of middle-class power, nationally. Locally, they are building on the cultural receptivity of the State as being liberal and cosmopolitan with which to engage. This is a heartland for LGBT political mobilisation and of public engagement with participatory politics. This research explores how participatory spaces are used, asking what they are; their claims; who uses them; what sort of identities are invoked in them; and what social and institutional relationships of knowledge and voice/power are at play. \ud In answering these questions, the research utilises a range of methods including an ethnographic suite of tools to engage with a range of local groups, both within and outside of participatory settings. This establishes the world views and motives of different groups and individuals within these groups, revealing diversities among those defined as LGBT. In turn, this has enabled understanding of the minutiae of the local social worlds and through so-doing makes an original contribution to the furtherance of existing academic knowledge.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Figure 1: The setting of the Municipal Conference - the Council Chamber in Porto Alegre City Hall ....................................................................................................4 Figure 2: Flowchart to show Schumaker's (1975) idea of governmental responsiveness. This will be adapted and refined through the course of this chapter for this case........................................................................................... 39 Figure 3: Map of the Central neighbourhoods of Porto Alegre showing conference venues, group offices (if any), and the main areas of LGBT socialisation, the Cidade Baixa and Farroupilha Park. ..................................................................44 Figure 4: The route from initial engagement with the process to ensuring access .......................................................................................................................... 52 Bondi, L. 1993. Locating identity politics. In: Keith, M. and Pile, S. eds. Place and the politics of identity. New York: Routledge. pp. 84-101.
    • Both, J.E., Leite, M.T., Hildebrandt, L.M., Pilati, A.C.L., Stamm, B. and Jantsch, L.B. 2011.
    • [Groups of Association: A strategy for the insertion of the elderly into society]. Revista Contexto e Saúde 10(20), pp. 995-998. Ijuí: Editoria Unijuí. (In Portuguese).
    • Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Bourdieu, P. 1986. The forms of capital. In: Richardson, J. ed. Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. New York: Greenwood. pp. 241-258.
    • Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L. 1999. On the cunning of imperialist reason. Theory, Culture and Society 16(1), pp. 41-58.
    • Brinkerhoff D.W. and Azfar, O. 2006. Decentralization and Community Empowerment: Does community empowerment deepen democracy and improve service delivery. Washington DC: US Agency for International Development, Office of Democracy and Governance.
    • Brown, G., Browne, K., Elmhirst, R. and Hutta, S. 2010. Sexualities in/of the Global South.
    • Geography Compass 4(10), pp. 1567-1579.
    • Brown, M. 1995. Ironies of distance: an ongoing critique of the geographies of AIDS.
    • Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 13, pp. 159-84.
    • Brown, M.P. 2000. Closet space: Geographies of metaphor from the body to the globe.
    • Buechler, S.M. 1995. New social movement theories. The Sociological Quarterly 36(3), pp.
    • Buechler, S.M. 2000. Social movements in advanced capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Burr, V. 1995. An introduction to social constructionism. London: Routledge.
    • Burstein, P., Einwohner, R.L. and Hollander, J.A. 1995. The success of political movements: a bargaining perspective. In: Jenkins, J.C. and Klandermans, B. eds. The Politics of Social Protest. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. pp. 275-295.
    • Bush, J. 2000. 'It's just part of being a woman': Cervical screening, the body and femininity.
    • Social Science and Medicine 50, pp. 429-444.
    • Butler, J. 1990. Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge.
    • Butler, J. 1997. Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. London: Routledge.
    • Cable, S. and Degutis, B. 1997. Movement outcomes and dimensions of social change: The multiple effects of local mobilization. Current Sociology, 46(3), pp. 121-135.
    • Calabre, L. 2014. [Cultural Policy in democratic times: the Lula era]. Revista do Instituto de Estudos Brasileiros (58), pp. 137-156. (In Portuguese).
    • Calhoun, C. 1992. Introduction: Habermas and the public sphere. In: Calhoun, C. ed.
    • Habermas and the public sphere. London: MIT Press. pp. 1-50.
    • Calhoun, C. 2001. Putting emotions in their place. In: Goodwin, J., Jasper, J. M. and Polletta, F. eds. Passionate politics: Emotions and social movements. London: University of Chicago Press. pp. 45-57.
    • Campbell, B. 2015. Margaret Thatcher: To be or not to be a woman. British Politics 10(1), pp. 41-51.
    • Cândido, A. 1965. [Literature and society]. São Paulo: Editoria Nacional. (In Portuguese).
    • Cândido, A. 1970. [Dialectic of malandroism]. Revista do Instituto de estudos brasileiros, 8, São Paulo, USP, pp. 67-89. (In Portuguese).
    • Cândido, A. 1970. [Criticism and sociology (an attempt at clarification)]. Perspectiva pp. 630- 633. (In Portuguese) Cândido, A. 1989. [Literature and underdevelopment]. A educação pela noite & outros ensaios. São Paulo: Ática, pp. 140-162. (In Portuguese).
    • Cândido, A. 1993. [Discourse and the city]. São Paulo: Livraria Duas Cidades. (In Portuguese) Canel, E. 1997. New social movement and resource mobilization: the need for integration.
    • In: Kaufman, M. and Dilla, H. eds. Community Power and Grassroots Democracy. London: Zed Books, pp. 189-221.
    • Cardoso, R. 2008. [Urban social movements: Critical balance]. In: Sorj, B. and Almeida, M,H.T. eds. Sociedade política no Brasil pós-6l [online]. Rio de Janeiro: Centro Edelstein de Pesquisas Sociais 2008. pp. 313-350. (In Portuguese).
    • Cardoso, R.L. 2011. [Collected works]. São Paulo: Mameluco. (In Portuguese).
    • Carvalho, J.M. de 1997. [Despotism, coronelism, clientelism: A conceptual discussion].
    • Dados, 40(2), pp.229-250. (In Portuguese).
    • Casino, V.J. del 2007. Health/sexuality/geography. In: Browne, K., Lim, J. and Brown, G.
    • eds. Geography of sexualities: theories, practices and politics. Farnham: Ashgate. pp. 39-52.
    • Castells, M. 1983. The city and the grassroots. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    • Castells, M. 2004. The power of identity: economy, society and culture. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Castro Alves, A.F. 1869 (2012). [The slave ship]. Recife: Escrita Fina. (In Portuguese).
    • Castro, H.C.O. and Reis, F, T. 2012. [Political participation in Brazil in the Twenty-First Century: changes and continuities]. Teoria & Pesquisa - Revista de Ciência Políticas 21(2), pp. 20-33.
    • Chambers, I. 1994. Migrancy, culture, identity. London: Routledge.
    • Charmaz, K. 2008. Reconstructing grounded theory. In: Alasuutari, P., Bickman, L. and Brannen, J. eds. The SAGE handbook of social research methods. London: SAGE. pp. 461- 478.
    • Charmaz, K. and Mitchell, R.G. 2001. Grounded theory in ethnography. In: Atkinson, P., Coffey, A., Delamont, S., Lofland, J. and Lofland, L. eds. Handbook of ethnography. London: SAGE, pp. 160-174.
    • Chauí, M.S. 1993. [500 years. Culture and politics in Brazil]. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais 38, pp. 49-55. (In Portuguese).
    • Chauí, M.S. 2000. [Brazil: Founding myth and authoritarian society]. São Paulo: Editora Fundação Perseu Abramo. (In Portuguese).
    • Chauí, M.S. 2002. [Religious fundamentalism: the question of teleological-political power].
    • In: Atilio A. B. ed. Filosofia Política Contemporânea: controvérsias sobre civilización, império y ciudadanía. Buenos Aires: Clacso. pp. 117-134. (In Spanish).
    • Chauí, M.S. 2004. [The return of the theological politician]. In: Cardoso, S. ed. Retorno ao republicanismo. Belo Horizonte, MG: Editora UFMG. pp. 93-134. (In Portuguese).
    • Chauí, M.S. 2006. [Simulacrum and power: An analysis of the media]. São Paulo: Editora Fundação Perseu Abramo. (In Portuguese).
    • Chouliaraki, L. and Fairclough, N. 1999. Discourse in late modernity: rethinking critical discourse analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    • Coelho, V.S., Ferraz, A., Fanti, F. and Ribeiro, M. 2010. [Mobilisation and participation: A zero-sum game?] Novos Estudos 86, pp. 120-139. (In Portuguese).
    • Cohen, A. 1985. The symbolic construction of reality. London: Routledge.
    • Collins, P.H. 1990. Black feminist thought: knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
    • Connell, R.W. 2005. Change among the gatekeepers: Men, masculinities, and gender equality in the global arena. Signs 30(3), pp. 1801-1825.
    • Connell, R.W. and Messerschmidt, J.W. 2005. Hegemonic masculinity rethinking the concept. Gender and society 19(6), pp. 829-859.
    • Cooke, B. and Kothari, U. 2001. The case for participation as tyranny. In: Cooke, B. and Kothari, U. eds. Participation: the new tyranny? London: Zed Books, pp. 1-15.
    • Coombs, W. T., and Holladay, S. J. 2002. Helping crisis managers protect reputational assets initial tests of the Situational Crisis Communication Theory. Management Communication Quarterly 16(2), pp. 165-186.
    • Corrêa, R.L. 1995. [Urban space]. São Paulo: Ática. (In Portuguese).
    • Correia, A.M.A. 2010. [Privatised culture - finance políticas in neoliberal Brazil: the case of the Rouanet law]. Biblioteca Latino-Americana de Cultura e Comunicação 1(1), pp. 1-17. (In Portuguese).
    • Cream, J. 1995. Re-solving the Riddles: The Sexed Body. In: Bell, D. and Valentine, G. eds.
    • Mapping Desire: Geographies of Sexualities. London: Routledge. pp. 31-40.
    • Dalton, R.J., Kuechler, M. and Bürklin, W. 1990. The challenge of new movements. In: Dalton, R.J., Kuechler, M. eds. Challenging the political order: New social and political movements in Western democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3-20.
    • Daniliauskas, M. 2011. [Gender relations, sexual diversity and education Políticas Públicas: an analysis of the Brasil Sem Homofobia programme]. Masters' Dissertation: Universidade de São Paulo.
    • Davies, C.A. 1999. Reflexive ethnographies: a guide to researching selves and others.
    • Emirbayer, M. 1997. Manifesto for a Relational Sociology. American Journal of Sociology 103, pp. 287-292.
    • Escobar, O. 2011. Public Dialogue and Deliberation. A communication perspective for public engagement practitioners, Edinburgh: Edinburgh Beltane - UK Beacons for Public Engagement.
    • Foucault, M. 1991. Governmentality. In: Burchell, G., Gordon, C. and Miller, P. eds. The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 87- 104.
    • Foucault, M. 2006. History of Madness. London: Routledge. (Translated from the French by Jonathan Murphy and Jean Khalfa).
    • Foucault, M. 2007. Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977- 1978. New York: Palgrave MacMillian. (Translated from the French by G. Burchell).
    • Fox, R.G. 2002. The study of historical transformation in American anthropology. In: Gingrich, A. and Fox, R.G. eds. Anthropology, by comparison. Abingdon: Routledge, pp.
    • Francis, D. and Hester, S. 2004. An invitation to ethnomethodology: language, society and interaction. London: SAGE.
    • Frank, A.G. 1975. On capitalist underdevelopment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Fraser, N. 1990. Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text 25/26, pp. 56-80.
    • Fraser, N. 1995. From redistribution to recognition? Dilemmas of justice in a 'post-socialist' age. New left review I/212, pp. 68-93.
    • Fraser, N. 1998. Social justice in the age of identity politics: Redistribution, recognition, participation, WZB Discussion Paper, No. FS I 98-108.
    • Freire, P. 1982. Creating alternative research methods: Learning to do it by doing it. In: Hall, B., Gillette, A. and Tandon, R. eds. Creating knowledge: a monopoly? New Delhi: Participatory Research in Asia. pp. 29-37.
    • Freston, P. 1995. Pentecostalism in Brazil: a brief history. Religion 25, pp. 119-133.
    • Freston, P. 2008. The religious field among Brazilians in the United States. In: Jouët-Pastré, C. and Braga, L.J. eds. Becoming Brazuca: Brazilian immigration to the United States.
    • Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. pp. 255-270.
    • Freston, P. 2013. Pentecostals and politics in Latin America: compromise or prophetic witness? In: Miller, D.E., Sargeant, K.H. and Flory, R. eds. Spirit and power: the growth and global impact of Pentecostalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 101-118.
    • Freyre, G. 1933. [The masters and slaves.] Rio de Janeiro: Imprensa Nacional. (In Portuguese).
    • Fry, P. 1982. [“Para inglês ver” (For appearance's sake): identity and politics in Brazilian culture]. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar. (In Portuguese).
    • Fung, A. and Wright, E.O. 2001. Deepening democracy: innovations in empowered participatory governance. Politics and Society 29(1), pp. 5-41.
    • Haines, H. 1984. Black radicalization and the funding of civil rights, 1957-1970. Social Problems, 23(1), pp. 31-43.
    • Walker, E.T. 2014. Grassroots for hire: Public affairs consultants in American democracy.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article