LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Hollowood, Tracey Ann
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
Subjects:
A newly recruited sensory panel was trained in magnitude estimation and time intensity sensory techniques. Sensory analysis was combined with instrumental analysis using MS Nose to investigate the relationship between stimulus and perception using simple model food systems. Volatile release data was collected after swallowing aqueous solutions containing a cocktail of aroma compounds. The compounds varied in their persistence during subsequent exhalations dependent on the degree of association with the mucous lining of the throat. The rate of breathing had no effect on the shape or intensity of the release profile. The data was successfully modelled using the basic principles of interfacial mass transfer. The mechanistic model included some estimated parameters for un-measurable anatomical and physiological variables, kinetic properties of the flavour compound and terms to represent the oscillatory breathing and airflow rate. Aside from the 1st exhalation, the model fitted the data very well. The panel rated the intensity of minty flavor in a 6% gelatine gel, containing varying concentrations of carvone. The flavor was assessed using Magnitude Estimation and Time Intensity Methods. In addition, the quantity of carvone released from the gel and reaching the assessors nose was measured, breath by breath during eating, using the MS Nose. The results showed that the quantity of volatile delivered to the nose was directly proportional to the concentration in the sample, however, the absolute quantity varied greatly between individuals. Further differences were observed in the temporal dimension of their release profiles, which related to differences in their anatomy, physiology and eating habits. In some cases, these differences were mirrored by the sensory data. The relationship between perceived intensity and sample concentration was linear for both types of sensory data. Neither the speed of eating nor the concentration of volatile reached in-nose, affected an individuals ability to judge intensity. There was evidence to suggest, however, that the speed of eating affected the level of adaptation to the carvone stimulus. The affinity of the aroma compound for water (hydrophobicity) was an important factor in influencing the temporal characteristics of the instrumental and sensory data. When aroma release was rapid (< Tmax) the sensory response occurred slightly later whereas when the aroma release was much slower (>Tmax), with intensity increasing more gradually, the sensory response preceded the instrumental data. These phenomena were explained in terms of a lag phase for neural processing when the stimulus was presented quickly and adaptation to the stimulus when it was delivered over a longer period of time. A trained sensory panel assessed flavour and sweetness intensity in solutions containing varying concentrations of Hydroxy Propyl Methylcellulose (HPMC), sugar and flavour volatile. The flavour and sweetness of the viscous solutions were rated using magnitude estimation with a controlled modulus. In addition, the concentration of volatile released on the breath was measured using MS Nose. For low concentrations of HPMC (<0.5g/100g), perceived flavour intensity remained the same, however, a steady decrease was noted at higher concentrations (>0.6g/100g). The change in perceived intensity occurred at the point of random coil overlap (c*) for this hydrocolloid. The perceived sweetness of the solution showed a similar pattern with increasing HPMC concentration, although the inflection at c* was not so obvious. Despite the change in perceived flavour intensity, the actual concentration of volatile measured on the breath was not affected by the change in HPMC concentration. Low order polynomial models were produced to describe perceived flavour intensity and sweetness in viscous solutions containing HPMC and potential explanations for the changes in perception were discussed.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Arnold, G. M. and A. A. Williams (1986). The use of generalised Procrustes techniques in sensory analysis. Statistical procedures for food research. J. R. Piggott.
    • London, Elsevier Applied Science Publishers: 233-253.
    • Baek, I., R. S. T. Linforth, et al. (1999). “Sensory perception is related to the rate of change of volatile concentration in-nose during eating of model gels.” Chemical Senses 24(2): 155-160.
    • Baek, I., R. S. T. Linforth, et al. (1998). Correlating breath volatile concentrations with sensory perception using model gels. COST96 Interactions of food matrix with small ligands, Athens, EU.
    • Baines, Z. V. and E. R. Morris (1987). “Flavour/taste perception in thickened systems: The effect of guar gum above and below c*.” Food Hydrcolloids 1: 197- 205.
    • Baines, Z. V. and E. R. Morris (1988). Effect of polysaccharide thickeners on organoleptic attributes. Gums and stabilisers for the food industry. G. O. Phillips, P.
    • A. Williams and D. J. Wedlock. Oxford, IRL Press: 192-201.
    • Bakker, J. (1995). Flavor interactions with the food matrix and their effects on perception. Ingredient interactions. A. G. Gaonkar. New York, Marcel Dekker Inc: 411-440.
    • Bakker, J., N. Boudaud, et al. (1998). “Dynamic release of diacetyl from liquid gelatin in the headspace.” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 46(7): 2714- 2720.
    • Bakker, J., W. E. Brown, et al. (1996). Effect of food matrix on flavour release and perception. Flavour science: Recent developments. A. J. Taylor and D. S. Mottram.
    • Cambridge, Royal Society of Chemistry: 369-374.
    • Bakker, J., K. R. Langley, et al. (1995). Release of flavour from food matrices and effect on flavour perception. Aroma, Perception, Formation, Evaluation. M. Rothe and H.-P. Kruse. Potsdam-Rehbrucke, Deutsche Institut fur Ernahrungsforschung: 191-207.
    • Berglund, B. and T. Lindvall (1982). Olfaction. The nose, upper airway physiology and the atmospheric environment. D. F. Proctor and I. B. Anderson. Amsterdam, Elsevier: 279-305.
    • Bingham, A. F., G. G. Birch, et al. (1990). “Sensory studies with sucrose-maltol mixtures.” Chemical Senses 15(4): 447-456.
    • Bohdanecky, M. and J. Kovar (1982). Viscosity of Polymer Solutions. Amsterdam, Elsevier.
    • Bourne, M. C. (1982). Food Texture and Viscosity. New York, Academic Press.
    • Brauss, M. S., R. S. T. Linforth, et al. (1999). “Altering the fat content affects flavour release in a model yogurt system.” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 47: 2055-2059.
    • Brauss, M. S., R. S. T. Linforth, et al. (1999). The effect of changing the fat content on flavour release in a simple food system. COST96, Athens, Greece, EU.
    • Breslin, P. A. S. (2001). “Human gustation and flavour.” Flavour and Fragrance Journal 16: 439-456.
    • Cliff, M. and H. Heymann (1993). “Development and use of Time-Intensity methodology for sensory evaluation - a review.” Food Research International 26(5): 375-385.
    • Garrido, D., A. Calvino, et al. (2001). “A parametric model to average time-intensity taste data.” Food Quality and Preference 12: 1-8.
    • Godshall, M. A. and J. Solms (1992). “Flavor and sweetener interactions with starch.” Food Technology 46(6): 140 et seq.
    • Harrison, M. (1998). “Effect of breathing and saliva flow on flavor release from liquid foods.” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 46: 2727-2735.
    • Harrison, M. (1999). Mathematical model of flavour release in the throat after swallowing. Norwich, IFR.
    • Harrison, M. (2000). Mathematical models of release and transport of flavours from foods in the mouth to the olfactory epithelium. Flavour release. D. D. Roberts and A.
    • J. Taylor. Washington DC, American Chemical Society: 179-191.
    • Harrison, M., S. Campbell, et al. (1998). “Computer simulation of flavor release from solid foods in the mouth.” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 46(7): 2736-2743.
    • Harrison, M. and B. P. Hills (1996). “A mathematical model to describe flavour release from gelatine gels.” International Journal of Food Science and Technology 31(2): 167-176.
    • Harrison, M. and B. P. Hills (1997). “Mathematical model of flavor release from liquids containing aroma- binding macromolecules.” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 45(5): 1883-1890.
    • Harrison, M., B. P. Hills, et al. (1997). “Mathematical models of flavor release from liquid emulsions.” Journal of Food Science 62(4): 653 -659.
    • Harvey, B. A., J. M. Davidson, et al. (2000). Real time flavour release from chewing gum during eating. Frontiers of Flavour Science. P. Schieberle and K.-H. Engel.
    • Garching, Deutsche Forschungsanstalt fuer Lebensmittelchemie: 271-274.
    • Hills, B. P. and M. Harrison (1995). “Two-film theory of flavour release from solids.” International Journal of Food Science and Technology 30(4): 425-436.
    • Hirst, D. and T. Naes (1994). “A graphical technique for assessing differences among a set of rankings.” Journal of Chemometrics 8: 81.
    • Hollowood, T. A., R. S. T. Linforth, et al. (2002). “The effect of viscosity on the perception of flavour.” Chemical Senses 27: 583-591.
    • Hornung, D. E. and M. P. Enns (1994). The synergistic action of the taste and smell components of flavour. Synergy. G. G. Birch and G. Campbell-Platt. Andover, Intercept Limited: 145-154.
    • Hornung, D. E., M. M. Mozell, et al. (1980). Olfactory mucosa/air partitioning of odourants. Olfaction and Taste. H. Van der Starre. London, IRL Press Ltd: 167-170.
    • Hussein, M. M., R. Kachikian, et al. (1983). “Analysis for flavor resuduals in the mouth by gas chromatography.” Journal of Food Science 48: 1884-1885.
    • Ingham, K. E. (1996). Volatile release from foods: measurement in mouth. PhD, University of Nottingham.
    • Lee, W. E. and R. M. Pangborn (1986). “Time-Intensity - the Temporal Aspects of Sensory Perception.” Food Technology 40(11): 71-&.
    • Liu, Y.-H. and H. J. H. MacFie (1990). “Methods for averaging time-intensity curves.” Chemical Senses 15: 471-484.
    • Lubbers, S., P. Landy, et al. (1998). “Retention and release of aroma compounds in foods containing proteins.” Food Technology 52(5): 68 (8 pages).
    • MacFie, H. J. H. and Y. H. Liu (1992). “Developments in the analysis of timeintensity curves.” Food Technology 46(11): 92-97.
    • Mackay, D. A. M. and M. M. Hussein (1978). Headspace techniques in mouth odor analysis. Analysis of foods and beverages. G. Charalambous. New York, Academic Press: 283-357.
    • Malkki, Y., R. L. Heinio, et al. (1993). “Influence of Oat Gum, Guar Gum and Carboxymethyl Cellulose On the Perception of Sweetness and Flavor.” Food Hydrocolloids 6(6): 525-532.
    • Meilgaard, M., G. V. Civille, et al. (1999). Sensory evaluation techniques. Boca Raton, CRC Press.
    • Menting (1970). Journal of Food Technology 5: 111-126.
    • Overbosch, P. (1986). “A Theoretical-Model For Perceived Intensity in Human Taste and Smell As a Function of Time.” Chemical Senses 11(3): 315-329.
    • Overbosch, P., W. G. M. Afterof, et al. (1991). “Flavor release in the mouth.” Food Reviews International 7: 137-184.
    • Reid, R. C., J. M. Prausnitz, et al. (1987). Properties of gases and liquids. New York, McGraw Hill.
    • van Ruth, S. M., J. P. Roozen, et al. (1995). “Volatile Compounds of Rehydrated French Beans, Bell Peppers and Leeks: 1. Flavor Release in the Mouth and in 3 Mouth Model Systems.” Food Chemistry 53(1): 15-22.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article