Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Jurado, Ignacio; Leon, Sandra
Languages: English
Types: Article
There is a large body of research showing that the provision of social policies is higher under proportional electoral systems than under majoritarian rules. This paper helps to advance this literature by showing that the geographic distribution of social recipients plays an essential role in moderating the impact of electoral institutions on social provision. Using data on social spending in 22 OECD countries for the period 1980- 2010, results show that majoritarian systems increase the provision of the related social policy when recipients are concentrated in certain regions. When levels of concentration are high, social spending in majoritarian countries can surpass levels of provision in proportional representation systems.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Gardiner, Ben, Ron Martin, and Peter Tyler. 2011. Does Spatial Agglomeration Increase National Growth? Some Evidence from Europe. Journal of Economic Geography 11 (6):979Ð1006.
    • Grant, Wyn. 1985. The Political Economy of Corporatism. London: Macmillan.
    • Grossman, Gene M., and Elhanan Helpman. 2005. Party Discipline and Pork Barrel Politics. Working Paper 11396. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
    • Hall, Peter, and David Soskice, eds. 2001. Introduction, in Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Hansen, Wendy L. 1990. The International Trade Commission and the Politics of Protectionism. American Political Science Review 84 (1):21Ð46.
    • Huber, Evelyne, and John D. Stephens. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    • Iversen, Torben, and David Soskice. 2006. Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More Than Others. American Political Science Review 100 (2):165Ð81.
    • Jurado, Ignacio. 2012. The Politics of Distribution. DPhil. Oxford: University of Oxford.
    • Jurado, Ignacio. 2014. Party System Nationalisation and Social Spending. European Journal of Political Research 53 (2):288Ð307.
    • Jusko, Karen Long. 2006. Electoral Politics and Poverty Relief: How Changing Electoral Incentives Can Help the Poor. Manuscript. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
    • Jusko, Karen Long. 2011. Partisan Representation of the Poor: Electoral Geography, Strategic Mobilization, and Implications for Voter Turnout. Unpublished manuscript. Available at http://web.stanford.edu/~kljusko/Jusko_Strategic_Mobilization.pdf.
    • Jusko, Karen L. 2015. Electoral Geography and Redistributive Politics. Journal of Theoretical Politics 27 (2):269Ð87.
    • Katzenstein, Peter J. 1985. Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    • Keele, Luke, and Nathan J. Kelly. 2006. Dynamic Models for Dynamic Theories: The Ins and Outs of Lagged Dependent Variables. Political Analysis 14 (2):186Ð205.
    • Kenworthy, Lane, and Jonas Pontusson. 2005. Rising Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution in Affluent Countries. Perspectives on Politics 3 (3):449Ð71.
    • Korpi, Walter. 1978. The Working Class in Welfare Capitalism: Work, Unions, and Politics in Sweden. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    • Korpi, Walter. 1983. The Democratic Class Struggle. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    • Kwon, Hyeok Yong, and Jonas Pontusson. 2010. Globalization, Labour Power and Partisan Politics Revisited. Socio-Economic Review 8 (2):251Ð81.
    • Le—n-Alfonso, Sandra. 2007. The Political Economy of Fiscal Decentralization. Bringing Politics to the Study of Intergovernmental Transfers. Barcelona: Institut d'Estudis Auton˜mics.
    • Lijphart, Arend. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of 27 Democracies. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article