LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Windebank, J. (1999)
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
In contrast to the majority of research on the relationship between women and the state which bases its findings on nationally aggregated data and concentrates its analysis on the forces which shape national policy concerning gender, this article adopts a micro-social approach to this question. Based on the findings from an in-depth qualitative cross-national study of the child care strategies of 112 mothers working in secretarial or clerical occupations in two countries with very different configurations of ‘political motherhood’, namely, France and Britain, the article assesses the impact of these varying policy environments on the construction of mothering in the everyday lives of employed women.\ud \ud It finds that different configurations of political motherhood have a significant impact on the practical aspects of these women's child care strategies but less impact on their fundamental conceptions of the duties and responsibilities of mothering. It concludes by considering the significance of these findings for current debates concerning the role of the state in perpetuating or combating unequal gender relations.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • A. Artinian and L. Boccara (1992), Femmes au Travail, Hatier, Paris.
    • A. Borchorst (1990), 'Political motherhood and child care policies: a comparative approach to Britain and Scandinavia', in C. Ungerson (ed.), Gender and Caring: Work and Welfare in Britain and Scandinavia, Simon and Schuster, New York.
    • J. Brannen and P. Moss (1991), Managing Mothers: Dual-Earner Households After Maternity Leave, Unwin Hyman, London.
    • T. Calasanti and C. Bailey (1994), 'Gender inequality and the division of household labor in the United States and Sweden: a socialist-feminist approach', Social Problems, 35-53.
    • J. Commaille (1993), Les stratégies des femmes: travail, famille et politique, La Découverte, Paris.
    • R. Crompton (1996), 'Paid employment and the changing system of gender relations: a crossnational comparison', Sociology, 30:3, 427-45.
    • C. S. Darling-Fisher and L. B. Tiedje (1990), 'The impact of maternal employment characteristics on fathers' participation in child care', Family Relations, 39, 20-6.
    • C. Delphy and D. Leonard (1992), Familar Exploitation, Polity, Cambridge.
    • S. Dex, P. Walters and C. Alden (1993), French and British Mothers at Work, Macmillan, London.
    • L. Dominelli (1991), Women Across Continents: Feminist Comparative Social Policy, Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead.
    • S. Duncan (1995), 'Theorising European gender systems', Journal of European Social Policy, 5:4, 263-84.
    • Z. Eisenstein (1983), 'The state, the patriarchal family and working mothers', in I. Diamond (ed.), Families, Politics and Public Policy, Longman, New York.
    • J. Fagnani (1992), 'Les francaises font-elles des prouesses? Fécondité et travail professionnel et politiques familiales en France et en Allemagne de l'Ouest', Revue Francaise des Affaires Sociales, 46:2, 129-45.
    • J. Gardiner (1997), Gender, Care and Economics, Macmillan, Basingstoke.
    • J. Gershuny, M. Godwin and S. Jones (1994), 'The domestic labour revolution: a process of lagged adaptation', in M. Anderson, F. Bechhofer and J. Gershuny (eds.), The Social and Political Economy of the Household, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 151-97.
    • M. Haicault (1995), 'La tertiarisation des activités parascolaires', in J.-C. Kaufmann (ed.), faire ou Faire-faire? Familles et services, Presses Universitaires de Rennes, Rennes, 109-26.
    • L. Hantrais (1990), Managing Professional and Family Life, Dartmouth, Aldershot.
    • A. Harrop and P. Moss (1995), 'Trends in parental employment', Work, Employment and Society, 9:3, 421-44.
    • H. M. Hernes (1987), Welfare State and Women Power, Norwegian University Press, Oslo.
    • M. Hill (1987), Sharing Childcare in Early Parenthood, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
    • Institut National des Statistiques et des Etudes Economiques (1995), Les femmes, Insee, Paris.
    • J. Jenson (1986), 'Gender and reproduction. Or babies and the state', Studies in Political Economy, 20, 9-46.
    • J. E. Kolberg (1991), 'The gender dimension of the welfare state', International Journal of Sociology 21:2, 119-48.
    • C. Lane (1993), 'Gender and the labour market in Europe', Sociological Review, 41, 274-301.
    • M. Langan and I. Ostner (1991), 'Gender and welfare: towards a comparative perspective', in G. Room (ed.), Towards a European Welfare State, SAUS Publications, Bristol.
    • A. Leira (1992), Welfare States and Working Mothers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    • F. Leprince (1991), 'Day care for young children in France', in P. Moss and E. Melhuish (eds.), Day Care for Young Children, Routledge, London.
    • L. A. Leslie, M. Branson and E. A. Anderson (1989), 'The impact of couples' work profile on husbands' and wives' performance of childcare tasks', Family Perspective, 22, 327-44.
    • J. Lewis (1992), 'Gender and the development of welfare regimes', Journal of European Social Policy 2:3, 159-74.
    • J. Monk and M. D. Garcia Ramon (1996), 'Placing women of the European Union', in M. D. GarciaRamon and J. Monk (eds.), Women of the European Union: the Politics of Work and Daily Life, Routledge, London, 1-30.
    • J. O'Reilly (1994), The Flexibility of Restructuring: a Comparison of Flexible Employment Strategies in the Retail Banking Sector in France and Britain, Avebury, Aldershot.
    • C. Pateman (1988), 'The patriarchal welfare state', in A. Gutman (ed.), Democracy and Welfare State, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
    • J. H. Pleck (1985), Working Wives / Working Husbands, Sage, Beverley Hills.
    • B. Siim (1990), 'Women and the welfare state: between private and public dependence: a comparative approach to care work in Denmark and Britain', in C. Ungerson (ed.), Gender and Caring: Work and Welfare in Britain and Scandinavia, Simon and Schuster, New York.
    • F. de Singly (1993), Parents salariés et petites maladies d'enfant, La Documentation Française, Paris.
    • F. de Singly and E. Maunaye (1995), 'Le role et sa délégation: l'exemple du role maternel de gardemalade', in J.-C. Kaufmann (ed.), faire ou Faire-faire? Familles et services, Presses Universitaires de Rennes, Rennes, 93-108.
    • C. Ungerson (ed.) (1990), Gender, Caring and Welfare in Britain and Scandinavia, Simon and Schuster, New York.
    • S. Walby (1990), Theorising Patriarchy, Blackwell, Oxford.
    • T. Willemsen, G. Frinking with R. Vogels (1995), Work and Family in Europe: the Role of Family Policies, Tilburg University Press, Tilburg.
    • J. Windebank (1992), 'Comparing women's employment patterns across the European Community: issues of method and interpretation', Women's Studies International Forum, 15:1, 65-76.
    • J. Windebank, (1996), 'To what extent can social policy challenge the dominant ideology of mothering? A cross-national comparison of Sweden, France and Britain', Journal of European Social Policy, 6:2, 147-61.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article