LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Koskenvesa, Anssi; Koskela, Lauri
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
Subjects: TH
The main objective of this paper is to examine labor productivity and waste and their role in production planning and control in Finnish construction industry. Three hypothesis are tested: (1) the assumption that labor productivity concerning different construction work disciplines has developed very little in the last 30 years; (2) the amount of waste has stayed on a constant high level on sites in the Finnish construction industry; and (3) labor productivity does not develop because the initial information included in the production plans includes also waste as an accepted phenomenon. A trend analysis of construction labor productivity is conducted over the period 1975-2008. Labor productivity and waste are examined through data from sites and\ud Ratu-research (Finnish Construction Production Data on work methods and work rates). The results are examined along with prior international research findings on construction labor productivity, waste and production planning processes. Although the data and sites, as well as the Ratu-research material, are Finnish, the\ud results are internationally applicable and can be utilized and connected to modern ways of working anywhere. Evaluation and considerations made in this paper are followed by further work.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Abdel-Wahab, M., Dainty, A., Ison, S., Bowen, P. & Hazlehurst, G. (2008). ―Trends of skills and productivity in the UK construction industry.‖ Journal of Engineering, Construction, and Architecture Management, 15(4), pp.372-382.
    • Ahokas, J. & Kiiras, J. (1976). ―The preparation of production files for house construction.‖ Main report, Research Notes 42. Technical Research Centre of Finland, Laboratory of Building Economics, Espoo, Finland.
    • Ahti, A. (2009). ―Rakennusalan taloustaantuman 2009-2012 vertailu talouslamaan 1990-1994.‖ Rakentajain kalenteri 2010, pp. 487-496. Helsinki, Finland.
    • Ballard, G. (2000). ―The Last Planner System of production control‖, PhD thesis, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
    • Ballard, G. and Howell, G. (2003). "An update on Last Planner‖, Proc., 11th IGLC Conference, Blacksburg, VA.
    • Bertelsen, S. (2003). ―Complexity - Construction in a New Perspective.‖ Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of the IGLC, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.
    • Christian, J. & Hachey, D. 1995. ―Effects of Delay Times on Production Rates.‖ Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 121, (1), pp. 20-26
    • Clarke, L. & Wall, C. (1996). ―Skills and the construction process.‖ Housing Research Report.
    • Drewin, F.J. (1982). Construction productivity. Elsevier Science Pub. N.Y., USA.
    • Goodrum, P. & Haas, T. (2002). ―Partial Factor Productivity and Equipment Technology Change at Activity Level in U.S. Construction Industry.‖ Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. Volume 128, Issue 6, pp. 463-472.
    • Haugen, T. (1999). ―The Building Process: challenges in a changing environment.‖ Proceedings of the Nordic Seminar on Construction Economics and Organization, Gothenburg, Sweden.
    • Horman, M. & Kenley, R. (2005) "Quantifying levels of wasted time in construction with meta-analysis.‖ Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE. 131, Issue 1, 52-61.
    • Josephson, P.-E., and Saukkoriipi, L. (2005). ―Slöseri i byggprojekt - Behov av förändrat synsätt.‖ FoU-Väst report 0507, Gothenburg, Sweden
    • Jonsson, J. (2006) ―Construction Site Productivity Measurements.‖ Luleå University of Technology, Division of Construction Management, Luleå, Sweden.
    • Kiiras, J. (1989) ―Opas ja Turva.‖ (A schedule and resource planning system for the implementation phase control of special projects). Helsinki University of Technology, CEM Publications 217, Espoo, Finland.
    • Koskela, L. (1992). ―Application of the new production philosophy to construction.‖ Technical report no. 72, CIFE, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
    • Koskela, L. (2000). ―An exploration towards a production theory and its application to construction.‖ VTT Publications 408. Espoo, VTT Building Technology, 296 p.
    • Koskela, L. (2004). ―Making-Do - The Eighth Category of Waste.‖ 12th Annual IGLC Conference, Denmark.
    • Koskenvesa, A. (1989). ―Ratu-tuotantotiedoston tiedonkeruun kehittäminen.‖ (Developing the data collection of Ratu production files). Helsinki University of Technology, Construction Economy and Management. Espoo, Finland.
    • Koskenvesa, A. and Koskela, L. (2005). ―Introducing Last Planner: Finnish Experiences.‖ Proc., CIB Symposium, Helsinki, Finland.
    • Lahdenperä, P. (1995). ―Reorganizing the building process, the holistic approach.‖ VTT Building Technology. Tampere, Finland.
    • Lavender, S. (1996). ―Management for the Construction Industry.‖ Longman, Harlow.
    • Lee, S-H., Diekmann, J., Songer, A. & Brown, H. (1999). ―Identifying waste: Applications of construction process analysis.‖ Proceedings of the 9th IGLC Conference. Berkeley, USA.
    • Liker, J. K. (2004). The Toyota Way - 14 management principles from the world's greatest manufacturer. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA
    • Lindfors, C. 2003. ―Process Oriented Information Management in Construction.‖ Royal Institute of Technology. Stockholm, Sweden.
    • Lutz, J.& Gabrielsson, E. (2002). ―Byggsektorns struktur och utvecklingsbehov.‖ Byggkomissionen, Sweden.
    • Metod och Data. (1972). ―Swedish Construction Production Data.‖
    • Mäki, T. (2008) ―Ratu-tiedoston käyttö rakennustyömaan tuotannonsuunnittelussa.‖ (Using Ratu-production database in production planning on work sites). HY:n käyttäytymistieteellinen tiedekunta, kasvatustieteen laitos. Helsinki, Finland.
    • Naoum, S. (2001). ―People & Organisational management in Construction.‖ Thomas Telford Publishing, London, UK.
    • Nylén, K-O. (1999). ―Civil Works - Unique projects or repeatable process?‖ The Royal Institute of Technology. Stockholm Sweden.
    • Olomolayie, P., Jayawardane, A., & Harris, F. (1998). ―Construction Poductivity Management.‖ Longman, Harlow.
    • Osipova, E & Atkin, B. (2008). ―From project-oriented to process-oriented risk management in construction.‖ Proceedings BEAR 2008, 11-15 February: Building Resilience, Kandalama, Sri Lanka.
    • PMBOK Project Management Body of Knowledge. (2000). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. Newton Square: Project Management Institute. PA, USA , 176 p.
    • Ratu-database. (2010). Finnish Construction Production Data. www-ratu-hanke.fi
    • Rojas, E & Aramvareekul, P (2003). ―Labor Productivity Drivers and Opportunities in the Construction Industry.‖ Journal of Management in Engineering. Volume 19, Issue 2, pp. 78-82.
    • Sacks, R. (2004). ―Towards a Lean Understanding of Resource Allocation in a Multiproject Subcontracting Environment.‖ Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the IGLC, Helsingør, Denmark.
    • Sacks, R. & Harel, M. (2006). ―An economic game theory model of subcontractor resource allocation behavior.‖ Construction Management & Economics, Vol. 24, No. 8, pp. 869-881.
    • Salminen, J. (2005). Measuring Performance and Determining Success Factors of Construction Sites. Helsinki University of Technology, Structural Engineering and Building Technology. Espoo, 175 p.
    • Seppänen, O. (2009). ―Empirical Research on the success of Production Control in Building Construction Projects‖. Helsinki University of Technology, Structural Engineering and Building Technology. Helsinki, 187 p.
    • Sorri-Teir, E. & Hämäläinen, S. (1993). Talonrakennustyön tuotantotavan kehitys 1900-luvulla. (The development of production practices in house building in 1900-century). Ministry of Labour. Helsinki, Finland.
    • Stratton, R., (2009). ―Critical Chain Project Management - Theory and Practice.‖ Journal of Project Management and Systems Engineering, TOC Special Issue, Vol 4, pp. 149-173.
    • Teicholz, P. (2001). ―U.S. Construction Labor Productivity Trends, 1970-1998.‖ Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, pp. 427-429.
    • Thomas, H. & Zavrski, I. ―Construction Baseline Productivity: Theory and Practice.‖ Journal of Construction Engineering and Mgment, Vol. 125, No. 5, pp. 295-303.
    • Vennström, A. 2008. ―The Construction Client as a Change Agent.‖ Luleå University of Technology. Luleå, Sweden.
    • Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (1996). Lean thinking. Simon and Schuster, New York, USA
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article