Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Masters, K; Oh, EY; Simmons, B; Lintott, C; Graham, G; Greenhill, A; Holmes, K (2016)
Publisher: SISSA, Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati
Languages: English
Types: Article

Classified by OpenAIRE into

We investigate the development of scientific content knowledge of volunteers participating in online citizen science projects in the Zooniverse (www.zooniverse.org). We use econometric methods to test how measures of project participation relate to success in a science quiz, controlling for factors known to correlate with scientific knowledge. Citizen scientists believe they are learning about both the content and processes of science through their participation. We don’t directly test the latter, but we find evidence to support the former - that more actively engaged participants perform better in a project-specific science knowledge quiz, even after controlling for their general science knowledge. We interpret this as evidence of learning of science content inspired by participation in online citizen science.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Anderson, J. G. and Aydin, C. E., eds. (2005). Evaluating the Organizational Impact of Health Care Information Systems. New York, U.S.A.: Springer Science, Business Media Inc. DOI: 10.1007/0-387-30329-4.
    • Bak, H.-J. (2001). 'Education and Public Attitudes toward Science: Implications for the “Deficit Model” of Education and Support for Science and Technology'. Social Science Quarterly 82 (4), pp. 779-795. DOI: 10.1111/0038-4941.00059.
    • Bardar, E. M., Prather, E. E., Brecher, K. and Slater, T. F. (2007). 'Development and Validation of the Light and Spectroscopy Concept Inventory'. Astronomy Education Review 5 (2), pp. 103-113. DOI: 10.3847/AER2006020.
    • Bauer, M. W., Allum, N. and Miller, S. (2007). 'What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda'. Public Understanding of Science 16 (1), pp. 79-95. DOI: 10.1177/0963662506071287.
    • Bonney, R., Ballard, H., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Phillips, T., Shirk, J. and Wilderman, C. C. (2009). Public Participation in Scientific Research: Defining the Field and Assessing Its Potential for Informal Science Education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report. Washington, DC, U.S.A.: Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE). URL: http://www.informalscience.org/public-participation-scientific-resea rch-defining-field-and-assessing-its-potential-informal-science.
    • Brossard, D., Lewenstein, B. and Bonney, R. (2005). 'Scientific knowledge and attitude change: The impact of a citizen science project'. International Journal of Science Education 27 (9), pp. 1099-1121. DOI: 10.1080/09500690500069483.
    • Clary, E. G., Snyder, M. and Stukas, A. A. (1996). 'Volunteers' Motivations: Findings from a National Survey'. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 25 (4), pp. 485-505. DOI: 10.1177/0899764096254006.
    • Cox, J., Oh, E. Y., Simmons, B., Lintott, C. L., Masters, K. L., Greenhill, A., Graham, G. and Holmes, K. (2015). 'Defining and Measuring Success in Online Citizen Science: A Case Study of Zooniverse Projects'. Computing in Science & Engineering 17 (4), pp. 28-41. DOI: 10.1109/MCSE.2015.65.
    • Cronje, R., Rohlinger, S., Crall, A. and Newman, G. (2011). 'Does Participation in Citizen Science Improve Scientific Literacy? A Study to Compare Assessment Methods'. Applied Environmental Education & Communication 10 3, pp. 135-145. DOI: 10.1080/1533015X.2011.603611.
    • Curtis, V. (2015). 'Online citizen science projects: an exploration of motivation, contribution and participation'. Ph.D. thesis. The Open University. URL: http://oro.open.ac.uk/42239/.
    • Day, K. M. and Devlin, R. A. (1998). 'The Payoff to Work without Pay: Volunteer Work as an Investment in Human Capital'. The Canadian Journal of Economics 31 (5), p. 1179. DOI: 10.2307/136465.
    • DeVries Hassman, K., Mugar, G., Osterlund, C. and Jackson, C. (2013). 'Learning at the Seafloor, Looking at the Sky: The Relationship Between Individual Tasks and Collaborative Engagement in Two Citizen Science Projects'. In: Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning. Vol. 2, p. 265. URL: http://gerrystahl.net/proceedings/icls2010/proceedings2.pdf.
    • Durbin, J. (1954). 'Errors in Variables'. Review of the International Statistical Institute 22 (1), p. 23. DOI: 10.2307/1401917.
    • Evans, C., Abrams, E., Reitsma, R., Roux, K., Salmonsen, L. and Marra, P. P. (2005). 'The Neighborhood Nestwatch Program: Participant Outcomes of a Citizen-Science Ecological Research Project'. Conservation Biology 19 (3), pp. 589-594. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00s01.x.
    • Fischer, D. A., Schwamb, M. E., Schawinski, K., Lintott, C., Brewer, J., Giguere, M., Lynn, S., Parrish, M., Sartori, T., Simpson, R., Smith, A., Spronck, J., Batalha, N., Rowe, J., Jenkins, J., Bryson, S., Prsa, A., Tenenbaum, P., Crepp, J., Morton, T., Howard, A., Beleu, M., Kaplan, Z., van Nispen, N., Sharzer, C., DeFouw, J., Hajduk, A., Neal, J. P., Nemec, A., Schuepbach, N. and Zimmermann, V. (2012). 'Planet Hunters: the first two planet candidates identified by the public using the Kepler public archive data'. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 419 (4), pp. 2900-2911. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19932.x.
    • Gauchat, G. (2011). 'The cultural authority of science: Public trust and acceptance of organized science'. Public Understanding of Science 20 (6), pp. 751-770. DOI: 10.1177/0963662510365246.
    • Miller, S. (2001). 'Public understanding of science at the crossroads'. Public Understanding of Science 10 (1), pp. 115-120. DOI: 10.1088/0963-6625/10/1/308.
    • Prather, E. E., Cormier, S., Wallace, C. S., Lintott, C., Raddick, M. J. and Smith, A. (2013). 'Measuring the Conceptual Understandings of Citizen Scientists Participating in Zooniverse Projects: A First Approach'. Astronomy Education Review 12 (1), 010109, pp. 1-14. DOI: 10.3847/AER2013002.
    • Raddick, M. J., Bracey, G., Gay, P. L., Lintott, C. J., Murray, P., Schawinski, K., Szalay, A. S. and Vandenberg, J. (2010). 'Galaxy Zoo: Exploring the Motivations of Citizen Science Volunteers'. Astronomy Education Review 9 (1), 010103, pp. 1-18. DOI: 10.3847/AER2009036.
    • Root, T. L. (1988). Atlas of wintering North American birds: an analysis of Christmas bird count data. Chicago, IL, U.S.A.: University of Chicago Press. URL: http://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/A/bo377502 3.html.
    • Sherkat, D. E. (2011). 'Religion and Scientific Literacy in the United States'. Social Science Quarterly 92 (5), pp. 1134-1150. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00811.x.
    • Simpson, R., Page, K. R. and De Roure, D. (2014). 'Zooniverse: Observing the World's Largest Citizen Science Platform'. In: Proceedings of Second International Web Observatory Workshop. (April 2014). URL: http://wow.oerc.ox.ac.uk/wow-2014-papers/zooniverse-observing-the-w orld2019s-largest-citizen-science-platform/view.
    • Sturgis, P. and Allum, N. (2004). 'Science in Society: Re-Evaluating the Deficit Model of Public Attitudes'. Public Understanding of Science 13 (1), pp. 55-74. DOI: 10.1177/0963662504042690.
    • Trumbull, D. J., Bonney, R., Bascom, D. and Cabral, A. (2000). 'Thinking scientifically during participation in a citizen-science project'. Science Education 84 (2), pp. 265-275. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200003)84:2<265::AID-SCE7>3.0.CO;2-5.
    • von Roten, F. C. (2004). 'Gender Differences in Attitudes toward Science in Switzerland'. Public Understanding of Science 13 (2), pp. 191-199. DOI: 10.1177/0963662504043870.
    • Wallace, C. S., Prather, E. E. and Duncan, D. K. (2011a). 'A Study of General Education Astronomy Students' Understandings of Cosmology. Part I. Development and Validation of Four Conceptual Cosmology Surveys'. Astronomy Education Review 10 (1), 010106, pp. 1-20. DOI: 10.3847/AER2011029.
    • - (2011b). 'A Study of General Education Astronomy Students' Understandings of Cosmology. Part II. Evaluating Four Conceptual Cosmology Surveys: A Classical Test Theory Approach'. Astronomy Education Review 10 (1), 010107, pp. 1-9. DOI: 10.3847/AER2011030.
    • Willett, K. W., Lintott, C. J., Bamford, S. P., Masters, K. L., Simmons, B. D., Casteels, K. R. V., Edmondson, E. M., Fortson, L. F., Kaviraj, S., Keel, W. C., Melvin, T., Nichol, R. C., Raddick, M. J., Schawinski, K., Simpson, R. J., Skibba, R. A., Smith, A. M. and Thomas, D. (2013). 'Galaxy Zoo 2: detailed morphological classifications for 304,122 galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey'. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 435 (4), pp. 2835-2860. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt1458.
    • Williams, T. R. (2001). 'Reconsidering the History of the AAVSO-Part I'. Journal of the American Association of Variable Star Observers 29 (2), p. 132. URL: https://www.aavso.org/apps/jaavso/article/1880/.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article