Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Thornby, John Albert; Landheer, Dirk; Williams, T.; Barnes-Warden, Jane; Fenne, Paul; Norman, D.; Attridge, Alex; Williams, M. A.
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: U1, TA
Fundamental to any ballistic armour standard is the reference projectile to be defeated. Typically, for certification purposes, a consistent and symmetrical bullet geometry is assumed, however variations in bullet jacket dimensions can have far reaching consequences. Traditionally, characteristics and internal dimensions have been analysed by physically sectioning bullets – an approach which is of restricted scope and which precludes subsequent ballistic assessment. The use of a non-destructive X-ray computed tomography (CT) method has been demonstrated and validated Kumar et al., 2011); the authors now apply this technique to correlate bullet impact response with jacket thickness variations. A set of 20 bullets (9 mm DM11) were selected for comparison and an image-based analysis method was employed to map jacket thickness and determine the centre of gravity of each specimen. Both intra- and inter-bullet variations were investigated, with thickness variations of the order of 200 um commonly found along the length of all bullets and angular variations of up to 50 um in some. The bullets were subsequently impacted against a rigid flat plate under controlled conditions (observed on a high-speed video camera) and the resulting deformed projectiles were re-analysed. The results of the experiments demonstrate a marked difference in ballistic performance between bullets from different manufacturers and an asymmetric thinning of the jacket is observed in regions of pre-impact weakness. The conclusions are relevant for future soft armour standards and provide important quantitative data for numerical model correlation and development. The implications of the findings of the work on the reliability and repeatability of the industry standard V50 ballistic test are also discussed.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] P.J.T. Knudsen, P. Theilade; Terminal ballistics of the 7.62 mm NATO bullet autopsy findings, Int. J. Legal Med., 106 (2) (1993), pp. 61-67
    • [2] P.J.T. Knudsen, J.S. Vigsanaes, R. Rosmussen, P.S. Nissen; Terminal ballistics of the 7.62 mm NATO bullets: experiments in ordnance gelatine, Int. J. Legal Med., 108 (1995), pp. 62-67
    • [3] W.J. Taylor Jr., J.R. Vinson; Modeling ballistic impact into flexible materials, AIAA J., 28 (12) (1990), pp. 2098-2103
    • [4] T.G. Montgomery, P.L. Grady, C. Tomasino; The effects of projectile geometry on the performance of ballistic fabrics, Textile Res. J., 52 (7) (1982), pp. 442-450
    • [5] H. Kurtaran, M. Buyuk, M. Eskandarian; Ballistic impact simulation of GT model vehicle door using finite element method, Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech., 40 (2) (2003), pp. 113-121
    • [6] G. Ben-Dor, A. Dubinsky, T. Elperin; Ballistic impact, recent advances in analytical modelling of plate penetration dynamics - a review, Appl. Mech. Rev., Trans. ASME, 58 (2005), pp. 355-371
    • [7] D.S. Preece, V.S. Berg; Bullet impact on steel and Kevlar steel armor - computer modeling and experimental data, The Proceedings of the ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference - Symposium on Structures Under Extreme Loading (July 2004), pp. 25-29
    • [8] V.B.C. Tan, T.W. Ching; Computational simulation of fabric armour subjected to ballistic impacts, Int. J. Impact Eng., 32 (11) (2006), pp. 1737-1751
    • [9] P. Gotts, M. Tawell, S. Holden; Variations in ammunition used for testing personal armour, Personal Armour Systems Symposium (PASS 2010), September 13-17, Quebec, Canada (2010)
    • [10] R.P. Bixter, C.R. Ahrens, R.P. Rossi, D. Thickman; Bullet identification with radiography, Radiology, 178 (1991), pp. 563-567
    • [11] G.D. Dodd III, R.F. Budzik Jr.; Identification of retained firearm projectiles on plain radiographs. AJR, 154 (1990), pp. 471-475
    • [12] M. Mary-Jacque, E.O. Espinoza, M.D. Scanlan; Firearms examinations by scanning electron microscopy: observations and an update on current and future approaches, AFTE J., 24 (3) (1992), pp. 294-303
    • [13] A. Brandone, G.F. Piancone; Characterisation of firearms and bullets by instrumental neutron activation analysis, Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes, 35 (5) (1984), pp. 359-364
    • [14] A.C. Kak, M. Slanley; Principles of Computed Tomography Imaging, IEEE Publishing, New York (1999)
    • [15] J. Kumar, D. Landheer, J. Barnes-Warden, P. Fenne, A. Attridge, M.A. Williams; Inconsistency in 9 mm bullets measured with non-destructive X-ray computer tomography, Forensic Sci. Int., 214 (2011), pp. 48-58
    • [16] L.A. Feldkamp, L.C. Davis, J.W. Kress; Practical cone beam algorithm, J. Opt. Soc. Am. (A1 6) (1984), pp. 612-619
    • [17] J. Kumar, A. Attridge, P.K.C. Wood, M.A. Williams; Analysis of the effect of cone-beam geometry and test object configuration on the measurement accuracy of a computed tomography scanner used for dimensional measurement, Meas. Sci. Technol., 22 (3) (2011) (Article 035105)
    • [18] W.A. Kalendar; Computed Tomography: Fundamentals, System Technology, Image Quality Applications (3rd ed.), Publicis, Erlangen, Germany (2011)
    • [19] J. Thornby, D. Landheer, T. Williams, J. Barnes-Warden, P. Fenne, A. Attridge, M.A. Williams; Inconsistency of threat level in soft armour standards, correlation of experimental tests to bullet X-ray 3D images, Personal Armour Systems Symposium (PASS 2012), September 17- 21, Nuremberg, Germany (2012)
    • [20] L. Haag, A. Jason; Where are the bullets? The explanation for the lack of recognizable bullets or significant bullet fragments at certain shooting scenes, AFTE J., 44 (3) (2012), pp. 196-207
    • [21] B. Planka; Bullet deformation on unyielding targets, AFTE J., 43 (3) (2011), pp. 218-229
    • [22] R.B. Clough, J.A. Simmons; A theory of multiaxial plasticity based on integral dislocation dynamics, Acta Metall., 22 (5) (1974), pp. 513-521
    • [23] B. Planka; Evaluation of the terminal strain-hardening border in high-speed impact by means of 3D models, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Experimental Mechanics, Lisbon, Portugal (1994)
    • [24] US Military Standard MIL-STD-662F, V50 Ballistic Test for Armor; US Army Research Laboratory, Weapons & Materials Research Directorate, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD (December 1997)
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article