Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Sharma, Dinkar
Publisher: Elsevier Science BV
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: B, BF

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: psychological phenomena and processes
The Stroop paradigm has been widely used to study attention whilst its use to explore implicit memory have been mixed. Using the non-colour word Stroop task we tested contrasting predictions from the Proactive-Control/Task-Conflict model (Kalanthroff, Avnit, Henik, Davelaar & Usher, 2015) that implicate response conflict and task conflict for the priming effects. Using the study-test procedure 60 native English speakers were tested to determine whether priming effects from words that had previously been studied would cause interference when presented in a colour naming task. The results replicate a finding by MacLeod (1996) who showed no differences between the response latencies to studied and unstudied words. However, this pattern was predominately in the first half of the study where it was also found that both studied and unstudied words in a mixed block were slower to respond to than a block of pure unstudied words. The second half of the study showed stronger priming interference effects as well as a sequential modulation effect in which studied words slowed down the responses of studied words on the next trial. We discuss the role of proactive and reactive control processes and conclude that task conflict best explains the pattern of priming effects reported.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological review, 97(3), 332.
    • Conrad (1974). Context effects in sentence comprehension: A study of the subjective lexicon. Memory and Cognition, 2, 130 138. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.28.5.1019
    • De Pisapia, N., & Braver, T. S. (2006). A model of dual control mechanisms through anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex interactions. Neurocomputing, 69, 1322 1326.
    • Goldfarb, L., & Henik, A. (2007). Evidence for task conflict in the Stroop effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(5), 1170. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.5.1170
    • Gratton G., Coles M.G.H., & Donchin E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 450 480. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.480.
    • Henik, A., Kellogg, W. A., & Friedrich, F. J. (1983). The dependence of semantic relatedness effects upon prime processing. Memory & Cognition, 11(4), 366-373. doi:10.3758/BF03202451
    • Kalanthroff, E., Avnit, A., Henik, A., Davelaar, E. J., & Usher, M. (2015). Stroop proactive control and task conflict are modulated by concurrent working memory load. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(3), 869-875. doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0735-x
    • Kalanthroff, E., Goldfarb, L., & Henik, A. (2013). Evidence for interaction between the stop signal and the Stroop task conflict. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article